Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-09, 09:58 AM   #1
bfromcolo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bfromcolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Monument, Colorado
Bikes:
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sloping top tube stand over height

Where is the stand over height measured on a bike with a sloping top tube?

I ask because I am contemplating purchasing a new bike over the net and can't really test ride one.

Thanks
bfromcolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 10:40 AM   #2
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,366
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
I believe I've read that they take the average height of the top tube, which means measuring at the center of the top tube where most people tend to stand over their frames anyway.
joejack951 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 10:46 AM   #3
Mondoman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A Latvian in Seattle
Bikes:
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Another I've heard is about six inches forward of the intersection with the seat tube.
Mondoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 10:50 AM   #4
Jynx
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8
Posts: 4,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfromcolo View Post
Where is the stand over height measured on a bike with a sloping top tube? I ask because I am contemplating purchasing a new bike over the net and can't really test ride one.

Thanks
DO NOT GO BY STANDOVER HEIGHT.

Go by top tube but even then you should really test ride or atleast know what size you need.
Jynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 10:51 AM   #5
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,366
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Regardless of the correct answer though, you shouldn't be selecting a frame based solely on standover height. Virtual top tube length of a sloping TT frame is a much more important measurement to consider.
joejack951 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 10:53 AM   #6
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,115
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondoman View Post
Another I've heard is about six inches forward of the intersection with the seat tube.
That sounds about right. It's where you would stand when straddling the bike.

The old, if naive, rule of choosing a frame size by standing over the bike and being sure you have at least 1" of clearance was based on a level top tube. A sloping top tube will let you pick a much larger frame and you are likely to have a way too long top tube if you size it that way.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:08 AM   #7
bfromcolo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bfromcolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Monument, Colorado
Bikes:
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the responses.

I understand that the top tube length is more important assuming you can straddle the frame with some margin of safety. In the case of the frames I am comparing the top tube length is 0.4" different when comparing the 2" difference in sizes I am looking at. given the increased length of exposed seat post with the smaller frame this seems like it probably is close enough to not worry about. The larger frame would likely provide a more upright riding position, at least with whatever stem it comes with, which is preferable for me.

Maybe a better question is if a rider that wears 34" pants is cutting it too close with a mountain bike that has a 32.5" stand over height.

Thanks
bfromcolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:16 AM   #8
Jynx
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8
Posts: 4,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfromcolo View Post
Thanks for the responses.

I understand that the top tube length is more important assuming you can straddle the frame with some margin of safety. In the case of the frames I am comparing the top tube length is 0.4" different when comparing the 2" difference in sizes I am looking at. given the increased length of exposed seat post with the smaller frame this seems like it probably is close enough to not worry about. The larger frame would likely provide a more upright riding position, at least with whatever stem it comes with, which is preferable for me.

Maybe a better question is if a rider that wears 34" pants is cutting it too close with a mountain bike that has a 32.5" stand over height.

Thanks
DO NOT USE PANTS INSEAM.

measure your actual inseam.

you are setting yourself up for disaster. why can't you go to a local bike shop?
Jynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:17 AM   #9
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,366
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfromcolo View Post
Maybe a better question is if a rider that wears 34" pants is cutting it too close with a mountain bike that has a 32.5" stand over height.
Yes, IMO, unless being very upright (handlebars above saddle) is a very important concern of yours. My assumption is that you, like most guys, wear pants that a generally an inch or two longer than your real inseam.
joejack951 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:23 AM   #10
bfromcolo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bfromcolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Monument, Colorado
Bikes:
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jynx View Post
DO NOT USE PANTS INSEAM.

measure your actual inseam.

you are setting yourself up for disaster. why can't you go to a local bike shop?
I am looking at a bike from an online retailler that is not available from any of the local shops and trying to compare sizes with my current bikes. My current mountain bike is a 10 year old Gary Fisher Hoo Koo e Koo 19" frame, and it is about right or maybe a bit small, but I have not been able to find details on the frame geometry online, so I will take some measurements.
bfromcolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:24 AM   #11
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Standover height is from the ground to a level line through the intersection of the axis of the top tube with the axis of the head tube and through the seat tube.
The top tube length measured along the same level line is just as important.
Another reason I prefer a bike with a level top tube.
Al
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:27 AM   #12
StanSeven
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Bikes: Cervelo C3, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Posts: 11,997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 162 Post(s)
I hope you aren't spending a lot of money because its very likely you won't get something that fits. As others already have said, don't use standover height or inseam (alone) as a way to size. If you have to do it online and can't test ride it first, at least use a couple on line guides.

Here's one. Do a search and find at lreast one more. Each varies a little.

http://www.coloradocyclist.com/bikefit#introduction
StanSeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-09, 11:30 AM   #13
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,366
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanSeven View Post
its very likely you won't get something that fits.
If you know what fits, it's very unlikely that the bike won't fit you. He has a baseline in his current bike so as long as he doesn't stray far from it's measurements (mainly just TT length), he should be fine.
joejack951 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 PM.