Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

15/16/15 Spokes??

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

15/16/15 Spokes??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-09, 04:24 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
15/16/15 Spokes??

Hello,

I have been using 15/16/15 X 36 spokes for many years with no problems.

I am building new wheels with 32 spokes (cross 3).
Mavic Open Pro/Shimano 105 (10 speed).

I have 15/16/15 spokes that are the correct length.

I weigh 160 lbs.

My question is, does anyone have any experience using these 15/16/15 spokes
in a 32 spoke wheel?

Thank You.
Jim
jimfols is offline  
Old 07-31-09, 04:37 PM
  #2  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
1.8/1.6/1.8mm in a 700c wheel sounds a bit weak for a rear. front should be ok.
most 700c wheels I've seen use 14ga (2.0mm) spokes that are either straight or butted.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 07-31-09, 04:39 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
I've had good luck with them on my race wheels. Actually have a 24/28h wheelset with them for my track bike. I was anywhere between 145-165lbs during the time I was racing track. Also have them on a 28/32h tubular wheelset on my crit bike as well. The double-butting actually makes for a more durable wheel that doesn't go out of true easily (compared to straight-gauge spokes).
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 07-31-09, 04:55 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I would use 2.0-1.8-2.0 on the rear wheel driveside. And either 2.0-1.8-2.0 or 2.0-1.5-2.0 on the rear non-driveside.

Last edited by Al1943; 07-31-09 at 05:01 PM.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 09:47 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times in 48 Posts
I've got a pair of 6speed, 32 spoke wheels with those spokes, and they work fine. When I build a 10s wheel, i put a heavier spoke on the drive side, just to equalize the strain between both sides, but I'm nit sure that is necessary. It's easier to build with heavier spokes because they twist less, but 15g spokes are more than strong enough for a 32 spoke wheel.
Back in the day we used 36 spokes with sew-up tires, but modern rims have a deeper section, which makes the rim stronger, so it's safe to use fewer spokes. 32 is plenty for most rims, I'm riding 24 spokes now with no problem, and I weigh 195. The 24 spoke wheel has 2mm spokes, but I think it needs that for rigidity, or to make it easier to build (i didn't build it.), not for strength.

em

em
eddy m is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 10:14 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
I would use 2.0-1.8-2.0 on the rear wheel driveside. And either 2.0-1.8-2.0 or 2.0-1.5-2.0 on the rear non-driveside.
I'm not a particular fan of that build because it uses two different sizes of nipples. I once worked in a shop where somebody got 15 gauge and 15 gauge nipples mixed together in the same can. The only way that I could tell them apart was to test thread them onto a spoke. 14 gauge nipples will thread quite nicely onto a 15 gauge spoke but they won't hold.

Can you say PITA?
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 10:31 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943 View Post
I would use 2.0-1.8-2.0 on the rear wheel driveside. And either 2.0-1.8-2.0 or 2.0-1.5-2.0 on the rear non-driveside.
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
I'm not a particular fan of that build because it uses two different sizes of nipples. I once worked in a shop where somebody got 15 gauge and 15 gauge nipples mixed together in the same can. The only way that I could tell them apart was to test thread them onto a spoke. 14 gauge nipples will thread quite nicely onto a 15 gauge spoke but they won't hold.

Can you say PITA?
Actually, 2.0-1.8-2.0 and 2.0-1.5-2.0 use the same size nipples, but you are right that different size nipples are a PITA in a shop. OTOH I don't use 2.0-1.5-2.0 because they are expensive, twist too easily and are no stronger or lighter than a 1.8-1.6-1.8. In actual use, they are probably weaker because you can end up with a failure caused by torsional stress, if you are not careful.
Sometimes I use straight gauge one side and a DB on the other, so all the nipples are the same size, and sometimes I just deal with 2 sets of nipples. I lot depends on what stuff I have around my shop at the time.

em
eddy m is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 10:36 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,080
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3371 Post(s)
Liked 5,493 Times in 2,846 Posts
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
... 15 gauge and 15 gauge nipples mixed together in the same can.
Man, I *hate* it when that happens!
Shimagnolo is online now  
Old 08-01-09, 10:39 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by eddy m
Actually, 2.0-1.8-2.0 and 2.0-1.5-2.0 use the same size nipples,
Oops, you're right. The original post had to do with 15 gauge spokes and I didn't read Al's post carefully enough to notice that he wasn't recommending mixing 14 gauge and 15 gauge spokes on the same wheel.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 11:14 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by eddy m
OTOH I don't use 2.0-1.5-2.0 because they are expensive, twist too easily and are no stronger or lighter than a 1.8-1.6-1.8. In actual use, they are probably weaker because you can end up with a failure caused by torsional stress, if you are not careful.
I'm not disagreeing with you but from my experience with DT Revolutions, 2.0-1.5-2.0, the only problem I've had is on the driveside rear where they stretch too much from the higher tension needed to offset the low tension on the non-driveside. On wheel sets that I've built for myself with all Revolution spokes the DS rear spokes over a period of 5 years have stretched to the point that there are not enough threads left to maintain wheel dish or make truing adjustments. These I have rebuilt with Competition 2.0-1.8-2.0 on the DS rear. I have not had any break.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 02:14 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies, that's exactly what I was asking for.

I've been building my own wheels for over 40 years but this is the first time using less than 36 spokes.

I call it moving along with the times https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/lol.gif.

I'm going for it.

Jim
jimfols is offline  
Old 08-01-09, 03:42 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
I'm not disagreeing with you but from my experience with DT Revolutions, 2.0-1.5-2.0, the only problem I've had is on the driveside rear where they stretch too much from the higher tension needed to offset the low tension on the non-driveside. On wheel sets that I've built for myself with all Revolution spokes the DS rear spokes over a period of 5 years have stretched to the point that there are not enough threads left to maintain wheel dish or make truing adjustments. These I have rebuilt with Competition 2.0-1.8-2.0 on the DS rear. I have not had any break.

Al
If a spoke continues to stretch after the wheel is built, that spoke has exceeded its yield strength and has failed. YOu are not only not disagreeing with me, you are providing testimony that I am right. The only good reason I have ever heard for using those extremely butted spokes is that the shop doesn't need to worry about mixing large and small nipples.

em
eddy m is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.