Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Seat Post Length

    I was working on my seat post yesterday and something occurred to me. The bike I was working on, along with every other one I've ever had, have had seemingly short seat posts and stems.

    Now I'm wondering, what is common for seat posts and stems when it comes to length? Are they all like what I've encountered, where you get very little play with them in terms of how much you can adjust them? Or do you get more than an inch or two commonly between the minimum insertion and maximum insertion line (what I'm finding on these bikes)?

    I would think these bike companies would want their bikes as adjustable as possible to accomodate as many common body types as possible, but maybe I'm wrong?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    19,568
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Unless you're working on exotic racing frames or high end aerodynamic posts, a typical "short" seatpost will have about 4 inches of usable height - 6-1/2" overall, less 2-1/2" minimum insertion. Mountain posts of 300mm or longer have 10"and longer working ranges.

    I don't know what you're referring to when you say "maximum" insertion line. Unless there's an obstruction in the frame the post can be inserted as far as it will go.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  3. #3
    Bianchi Goddess Bianchigirll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Camp Hill, PA
    My Bikes
    Too many to list here check my signature.
    Posts
    19,399
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Hello I am sure all us will have different opinions on this but here is mine. first of all (going a bit backwards) bike companies do realize that people come in different sizes that is why frames comes in different sizes. the frame is bought to fit your general proportions and then the seatpost and stem is adjusted to fine tune the fit.

    seat post come in basically road 180mm to about 200 lengths and mountain about 350mm. generaly when adjusting a seat post only a few inches is needed if the frame size is correct. MTB seat post are longer because you need more stand over height but need to keep the seat to pedal distance.

    quill stems pretty much can standard as to how much up and down adjustment, again if the frame fits only fine tuning is needed. as for the "reach" (lenght from 'quill' to the bars) this is proportional to size of the bike. and generally a -71d angle. mtb bikes again the reach being proportional but had a more positive angle to allow tou be in slightly more upright position. many companies made 'aftermarket' stems of varing heights and reaches the most comon being the tall Nitto 'technomic'

    threadless stems again being proportional to the bike size also come in a wide variety of lenghts and angles. to adjust the fit. however unlike a quill stem gaining height with a threadless stem is dependant on the lenght of the steerer. that is whay most threadless bike seem to have an inch or more of spacers so you can finetune the height of the bars to some extent.

    I hope this helps rather than adding further confusion.
    Bianchis '87 Sport SX, '90 Proto (2), '91 Boarala 'cross, '93 Project 3, '88 Trofeo, '86 Volpe, '89 Axis, '79 Mixte, '99 Mega Pro XL Ti, '97 Ti Megatube, , '90 something Vento 603,

    Others but still loved,; '80 RIGI, '80 Batavus Professional, '87 Cornelo, '86 Bertoni (sold), '09 Motobecane SS, '98 Hetchins M.O., '09 K2 Mainframe, '89 Trek 2000, '?? Jane Doe (still on the drawing board), '90ish Haro Escape

  4. #4
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    10,956
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Adding a bit to BG's good summary, road seatposts have had lengths as much as 240 mm (Thomson Masterpiece) to around 280 mm (American Classic). Since 1977 (I think) they've been made with MINIMUM insertion marks, around 3 inches above the end of the post. If your saddle adjustment results in this line showing, you need a longer post. Decent ones are not $$. The "best" ones are $$$$$$$$$$$$, and in a few cases worth some extra money.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil, '83 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    1,289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bikes used to be fit to the rider better than they are today. . along the lines of what BG said. But, with the advent of the mountain bike came longer seat posts . . and with longer posts . . .suddenly the line of proper fit became blurry. Now it's very blurry. . . with very long seatposts on road and mtb's.

    Proper bike fit takes time . . .trail and error . . . and experience. This is something our "modern" world often sees little value in.

    Even paid mechanics in bike shops these days are sometimes shockingly poor. My neighbor told me he was looking for a new bike because his current one was "a bit small". Yeah . . he's 6' and he was riding about a 21" frame with a 7cm. stem. The mechanic who fit the bike for him raised the bars and seatpost to within 1" of their bottoms. . . not the min. insertion mark . . . the very bottom! I told him to not ride it like that, as those min. insertion marks are there for an important reason! He's a firefighter . . so I told him if he wished to keep his body intact to fight more fires . . . find a larger bike ! The mechanic who raised his bars and post should be banned from working on bikes.

  6. #6
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That, ^^^, is inexcusable.
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  7. #7
    Pwnerer Wordbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Pagosa Springs, CO, USA
    My Bikes
    Road, MTB, Cruiser, Chopper, BMX
    Posts
    2,880
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panthers007 View Post
    That, ^^^, is inexcusable.
    Agreed.

    Even as a kid back in the 70's, the rule of thumb we all used was "never above the lowest top tube weld".



    Since BMX bikes then and now are sold by top tube length, not seat tube length, a riders legs had to be accommodated by seatpost lengths. As long as you didn't exceed that insertion rule, you may break a post but you wouldn't break the frame.

    Considering that again bikes are being sold by top tube length, or by vague Small-Medium-Large-XL sizes, this rule still applies. Wedge-style, compact and other geometries have really messed with the traditional sizing methods. A large selection of seatpost lengths is the answer to accommodate variations in "people geometry".
    Quote Originally Posted by ahsposo View Post
    Ski, bike and wish I was gay.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
    I don't know what you're referring to when you say "maximum" insertion line. Unless there's an obstruction in the frame the post can be inserted as far as it will go.
    A couple of seat posts I've seen have maximum insertion marks.

  9. #9
    GO BIG RED norwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hastings,NE
    My Bikes
    1996 Bianchi Veloce 1993 Bridgestone MB-3 1992 Trek 700 1992 Trek 820
    Posts
    678
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn1234 View Post
    A couple of seat posts I've seen have maximum insertion marks.
    I think you are refering to "minimum" insertion marks. That is they have a minimum amount that HAS to be inserted into the frame. I've never seen a "maximum" insertion line.
    1996 Bianchi Veloce
    1993 Bridgestone MB-3
    1992 Trek 700
    1992 Trek 820

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by norwood View Post
    I think you are refering to "minimum" insertion marks. That is they have a minimum amount that HAS to be inserted into the frame. I've never seen a "maximum" insertion line.
    It's hard to get a good picture of a shiny metallic object, but hopefully you can see it on this seat post. If not the line itself, it should be apparent that there's some lettering there as well.
    Attached Images Attached Images

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •