Stem angle
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,787
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 522 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3228 Post(s)
Liked 3,854 Times
in
1,436 Posts
Stem angle
I'm buying a new frame and fork, and I want to end up with a fit on the new bike that matches the fit of another bike I own. I wrote a program to calculate the fit (yes, I am a geek) in terms of saddle position, stem length, etc., but I can get the same approximate handlebar position with multiple combinations of headset spacers and stem length and angle.
So here's my question: is there any reason, aside from aesthetics, to choose a relatively high stem position with a small angle over a lower stem position with a steeper offset?
That is, is there a reason to choose something like this:
over something like this:
or vice versa?
So here's my question: is there any reason, aside from aesthetics, to choose a relatively high stem position with a small angle over a lower stem position with a steeper offset?
That is, is there a reason to choose something like this:
over something like this:
or vice versa?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Carbon steerers have a maximum recommended spacer stack under the stem. Some maker place the limit at 30 mm and others at 50 mm for 1-1/8" steerers. The limit is almost universal at 25 mm for 1" carbon steerers.
Steel and aluminum steerers aren't as limited but an up-angle stem and a shorter spacer stack should make for a less flexy steering feel.
Steel and aluminum steerers aren't as limited but an up-angle stem and a shorter spacer stack should make for a less flexy steering feel.
#3
I suck, but you're worse
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 672
Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Uno-Got rid of the rest when I moved to LA:(
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You might also find a bit more stem flex(ie hand cushion) with the height taken up in the stem(2nd picture) over the steer tube, especially with a steel steer tube.
However I find downsloping stem to be sexy as hell
However I find downsloping stem to be sexy as hell
#4
Senior Member
Picture 1 is really ugly and picture 2 is only a little better, since both have big spacers stacks. I like to keep the spacers down to 5-10mm if possible, but I refuse to use a stem angle greater than 84-90. No flipped stems for me. Right now I'm using a 73 degree (horizontal) stem with a 5mm spacer above the 15mm headset top section.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 09-28-09 at 04:47 PM.
#5
I suck, but you're worse
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 672
Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Uno-Got rid of the rest when I moved to LA:(
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with the whole too many spacers thing on the top picture, but I still prefer the downslope look of the stem-looks faster to me, I've always thought the upslope stems looked ********
For the OP- Your a geek right? Whats the shortest distance between two points? Embrace your inner nerd.
For the OP- Your a geek right? Whats the shortest distance between two points? Embrace your inner nerd.
#6
I suck, but you're worse
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 672
Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Uno-Got rid of the rest when I moved to LA:(
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OMG bike forums just bleeped r e t a r d e d
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Picture 1 is really ugly and picture 2 is only a little better, since both have big spacers stacks. I like to keep the spacers down to 5-10mm if possible, but I refuse to use a stem angle greater than 84-90. No flipped stems for me. Right now I'm using a 73 degree (horizontal) stem with a 5mm spacer above the 15mm headset top section.
Not every one wants or can use the bars as low as a 73° or even a 90° stem plus a very short spacer stack will put them. Looks sometimes have to be sacrificed to practicality.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 910
Bikes: A beautiful columbus steel frame, 1986 Schwinn Voyageur touring bike, Currently Undergoing Overhaul
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
If you're running too many spacers, it's probably a good indication that the frame is a little too small for you.
Other than that, looks have to take a close second to fit.
Other than that, looks have to take a close second to fit.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,787
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 522 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3228 Post(s)
Liked 3,854 Times
in
1,436 Posts
Picture 2 is actually of the bike I'm trying to match. I don't know if I have weird proportions or maybe I have weird preferences, but it seems like bikes that fit me in terms of top tube length and standover don't have the bars as high as I want them without one (or both) of the solutions above.
As it turns out I've actually come to like the up-sloping stem, though I admit at first I thought it looked screwy. It's nice to hear that if will offer additional benefits, however minor.
Thanks to all for the responses.
As it turns out I've actually come to like the up-sloping stem, though I admit at first I thought it looked screwy. It's nice to hear that if will offer additional benefits, however minor.
Thanks to all for the responses.
#10
GO BIG RED
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hastings,NE
Posts: 678
Bikes: 1996 Bianchi Veloce 1993 Bridgestone MB-3 1992 Trek 700 1992 Trek 820
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Picture 1 is really ugly and picture 2 is only a little better, since both have big spacers stacks. I like to keep the spacers down to 5-10mm if possible, but I refuse to use a stem angle greater than 84-90. No flipped stems for me. Right now I'm using a 73 degree (horizontal) stem with a 5mm spacer above the 15mm headset top section.