How can I tell which size the wheels on my bike are?
10-17-09, 10:15 AM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How can I tell which size the wheels on my bike are?
from where to where should I measure the wheel ? or is it printed on the wheel somewhere ?
it's a "winner" mountain bike if that's of any relevance
it's a "winner" mountain bike if that's of any relevance
10-17-09, 10:31 AM
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yes it does say 26 x 559 on the tire but the thing is it's not the original tire on it.
I was hoping there is a print somewhere on the rim as well.
it gets more confusing because I read somewhere you need to measure it from rim to rim, and that came out 22".
how can that be ? am I measuring it wrong ?
I was hoping there is a print somewhere on the rim as well.
it gets more confusing because I read somewhere you need to measure it from rim to rim, and that came out 22".
how can that be ? am I measuring it wrong ?
10-17-09, 10:39 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,080
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3370 Post(s)
Liked 5,492 Times
in
2,845 Posts
yes it does say 26 x 559 on the tire but the thing is it's not the original tire on it.
I was hoping there is a print somewhere on the rim as well.
it gets more confusing because I read somewhere you need to measure it from rim to rim, and that came out 22".
how can that be ? am I measuring it wrong ?
I was hoping there is a print somewhere on the rim as well.
it gets more confusing because I read somewhere you need to measure it from rim to rim, and that came out 22".
how can that be ? am I measuring it wrong ?
10-17-09, 10:48 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
If the tire fits the rim it doesn't matter if it's the original or not and the sidewall size marking of the tire is still correct. Your wheel is the very common 26" MTB size (ISO 559).
BTW, the 26" number is an approximation to the overall outside diameter of the rim and tire together, not just the rim, and 559 mm = 22.0 inches.
BTW, the 26" number is an approximation to the overall outside diameter of the rim and tire together, not just the rim, and 559 mm = 22.0 inches.
10-17-09, 04:07 PM
#6
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,826
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 797 Post(s)
Liked 694 Times
in
371 Posts
Whoever told you to measure from rim to rim was thinking of car wheels, not bicycles. If they thought it applied to bicycles, they don't know bicycles.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
10-17-09, 04:17 PM
#7
Prefers Cicero
Mountain bike wheels are pretty much all the same size. The tires are usually about 2" in diameter so the whole wheel is approximately 26" and is referred to as a 26" wheel. Even if you put a tire that's only 1 1/2" in diameter on it, and the wheel is now 25", we still call it a 26" wheel. If you want to buy a new tire, get one that says 26" on it. The only thing you have to worry about is how wide the tire is.
Last edited by cooker; 10-17-09 at 04:20 PM.
10-17-09, 06:12 PM
#8
headtube.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 803
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
That's right, 22" = 559 mm. "26 inch" is supposed to refer to how big the tire is outside-outside. It doesn't, though, because there tires of different heights that fit on the same rim and they all get called "26". Just go the ETRTO rim size (559) and it'll be less confusing.
10-17-09, 06:25 PM
#9
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Not exactly... you need to get one that says 26 X 2.00 (or 26 X any decimal number). If a tire says 26 X 1-3/8 (or 26 X any fractional number) it will not fit on a modern mountain bike - those are different sizes. See the Sheldon Brown page for clarification.
10-17-09, 06:31 PM
#10
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+1 You need decimal tires, not fractional. Fractional tires are not the same size.
10-19-09, 04:46 PM
#11
Senior Member
Those vintage fractional sizes really throw you for a loop, especially if you get a bike where the tires are so rotted you can't read the size. It's trial and error time at the LBS, if they let you.
You'd think that somebody would just throw out the whole "older" ISO system and replace it with a decimal system that EVERYBODY could understand. Convert every tire size to a two number system that would eliminate the confusion. Sort of like 700x40c - but actually meaningful. Like "tire diameter at rim" and "tire width at rim".
Since China basically owns the lions share of bike manufacturing, I'd expect them to do it.
Sheldons info is really helpful.
You'd think that somebody would just throw out the whole "older" ISO system and replace it with a decimal system that EVERYBODY could understand. Convert every tire size to a two number system that would eliminate the confusion. Sort of like 700x40c - but actually meaningful. Like "tire diameter at rim" and "tire width at rim".
Since China basically owns the lions share of bike manufacturing, I'd expect them to do it.
Sheldons info is really helpful.
10-20-09, 10:54 AM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
You'd think that somebody would just throw out the whole "older" ISO system and replace it with a decimal system that EVERYBODY could understand. Convert every tire size to a two number system that would eliminate the confusion. Sort of like 700x40c - but actually meaningful. Like "tire diameter at rim" and "tire width at rim".
There are tires either too wide or two narrow to be a good fit on their otherwise matching diameter rim but any other sizing system won't address that any better than the ETRTO/ISO system does now. At some point you have to realize what you need or get some knowledgeable assistance.
