Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 3 millimeters

  1. #1
    fixed for the long haul 40 Cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    1975 Raleigh Professional, 1990 Cannondale 3.0 Touring bike
    Posts
    366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    3 millimeters

    I have a set of Shimano 600 cranks (FC-6400), and am looking for the ideal BB to pair with it. The recommended pairing long ago would have been the BB-6400, with a spindle length of 113.

    An earlier model BB (BB 6207) is on ebay right now. Length is 116.

    My cranks are not NOS. They show a bit of use, and often a longer spindle for older cranks is recommended because the holes have been worn a little. Is 3 mm significant, i.e., 1.5 mm per side, in terms of chainline? Is it perhaps recommended because the cranks are used? I'm building a double.

    Thanks for any help!

  2. #2
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You don't need the exact replacement that's spec'ed - 113 Un5x series shimano square taper cart are widely available.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  3. #3
    fixed for the long haul 40 Cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    1975 Raleigh Professional, 1990 Cannondale 3.0 Touring bike
    Posts
    366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    You don't need the exact replacement that's spec'ed - 113 Un5x series shimano square taper cart are widely available.
    Thanks for the quick reply. Good to know.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,176
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought the recommended bb for the Ultegra 8-speed double crank (6400) was 115 mm. I remember a BB-UN72 in 115 mm as the matching bb. In any event, a mm here or there isn't that critical.

  5. #5
    fixed for the long haul 40 Cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    1975 Raleigh Professional, 1990 Cannondale 3.0 Touring bike
    Posts
    366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks, all, for the input. Yeah, I don't want to drive myself crazy over a millimeter or two -- but this is my first build involving derailleurs (I've built fixed gears) and didn't know if chainline is even more crucial for smooth shifting. I'm gathering parts slowly so I have time to get the correctly spec'ed length, but I have a silly fondness for the old serviceable-type BBs.

    A.Winthrop, you may be correct about the 119mm for 6207; my research on it was not thorough.

  6. #6
    cycles per second Gonzo Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    Vitus Aluminum, DiamondBack Apex, Softride Powerwing 700, "Generic" Ishiwata 022, Trek OCLV 110
    Posts
    1,790
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    I thought the recommended bb for the Ultegra 8-speed double crank (6400) was 115 mm. I remember a BB-UN72 in 115 mm as the matching bb. In any event, a mm here or there isn't that critical.
    Yeah, that's what my 8-sp Ultegra bike came with. But it is has a fat seat tube and needs the crank a little more outboard to allow for shifting to the small ring. I think a skinny seat-tubed bike would be better with a 113mm but would still work fine with a 115mm or 116mm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •