Chain Question from an Idiot (Me)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chain Question from an Idiot (Me)
Ok, I've searched the forums. I've Googled it. I've read Sheldon Brown's page. I've looked in Zen and the Art of Road Bike Maintenance. Maybe I'm just obliviously missing the information everywhere, but I can't find any real chain information!!!!! AHHH!
1. I ride a Trek ZX 6500. Can I buy just an ole 3/32 chain (I don't real know what 3/32 means. I just read that you should only get a 1/8 chain for fixies********** What?).
2. I have read Park Tool's website that provides some excellent information on sizing a chain. The only problem is that it seems excessively complicated.
3. Is it really this hard to find and size a bicycle chain???
4. Flame away!
1. I ride a Trek ZX 6500. Can I buy just an ole 3/32 chain (I don't real know what 3/32 means. I just read that you should only get a 1/8 chain for fixies********** What?).
2. I have read Park Tool's website that provides some excellent information on sizing a chain. The only problem is that it seems excessively complicated.
3. Is it really this hard to find and size a bicycle chain???
4. Flame away!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
The more cogs you have on your cassette, the narrower your chain needs to be. So if you have a single speed, you can use a 1/8 in chain; 5, 6, or 7 speed cassette, you can use a 3/32 in chain. Once you get above that, it tends to be really finicky.
I'd just go to the LBS and say "I need a ___-speed chain."
I'd just go to the LBS and say "I need a ___-speed chain."
#3
I have senior moments...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 2,151
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The more cogs you have on your cassette, the narrower your chain needs to be. So if you have a single speed, you can use a 1/8 in chain; 5, 6, or 7 speed cassette, you can use a 3/32 in chain. Once you get above that, it tends to be really finicky.
I'd just go to the LBS and say "I need a ___-speed chain."
I'd just go to the LBS and say "I need a ___-speed chain."
OP when the 6500 was introduced it was a 7 speed, then became 8 speed, and the current 6500 is a 9 speed. Just ask your shop to install the appropriate chain for your bike...or do you think can handle a chain tool? Like Caloso said, ask the shop for a chain to match your drivetrain. Here's the basic definition of 1/8" vs 3/32" chain, guess you missed this on the Sheldon Brown site https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_ch.html
#4
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
3/32 is a width, in inches. It's 1/32 inch narrower than a 1/8 inch chain. In the 70's, as far as I know, there were two widths of bike chains, 1/8" and 3/32". Now there are many.
I wish we still used measurements in inches or millimeters. I don't know how wide a 6/7/8-speed chain is. I just know it's less than 3/32".
I wish we still used measurements in inches or millimeters. I don't know how wide a 6/7/8-speed chain is. I just know it's less than 3/32".
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#5
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Ok, I've searched the forums. I've Googled it. I've read Sheldon Brown's page. I've looked in Zen and the Art of Road Bike Maintenance. Maybe I'm just obliviously missing the information everywhere, but I can't find any real chain information!!!!! AHHH!
1. I ride a Trek ZX 6500. Can I buy just an ole 3/32 chain (I don't real know what 3/32 means. I just read that you should only get a 1/8 chain for fixies********** What?).
2. I have read Park Tool's website that provides some excellent information on sizing a chain. The only problem is that it seems excessively complicated.
3. Is it really this hard to find and size a bicycle chain???
4. Flame away!
1. I ride a Trek ZX 6500. Can I buy just an ole 3/32 chain (I don't real know what 3/32 means. I just read that you should only get a 1/8 chain for fixies********** What?).
2. I have read Park Tool's website that provides some excellent information on sizing a chain. The only problem is that it seems excessively complicated.
3. Is it really this hard to find and size a bicycle chain???
4. Flame away!
2) No, it's not. Pick one method and do it. Large large is quite simple. And give the shortest possible chain length. There are huge and lengthy debates on which one is "correct" or "better". Use search if you want to learn more about that
3) No.
#6
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
3/32 is a width, in inches. It's 1/32 inch narrower than a 1/8 inch chain. In the 70's, as far as I know, there were two widths of bike chains, 1/8" and 3/32". Now there are many.
I wish we still used measurements in inches or millimeters. I don't know how wide a 6/7/8-speed chain is. I just know it's less than 3/32".
I wish we still used measurements in inches or millimeters. I don't know how wide a 6/7/8-speed chain is. I just know it's less than 3/32".
No there isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about.
3/32 is the internal width of chains, 6/7/8/9/10 speed chains are all "3/32". Only their outside width changed. The number 3/32 is nearly irrelevant to the OP. Any bike with 6+ gears is obviously going to be a 3/32 chain no matter what. As already mentioned the only thing you need to know is how many cogs you're running in the back = speed of the chain needed. The Trek bike the OP has is going to be 7 or more gears in the rear if it has the stock components.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
3/32 is a width, in inches. It's 1/32 inch narrower than a 1/8 inch chain. In the 70's, as far as I know, there were two widths of bike chains, 1/8" and 3/32". Now there are many.
I wish we still used measurements in inches or millimeters. I don't know how wide a 6/7/8-speed chain is. I just know it's less than 3/32".
I wish we still used measurements in inches or millimeters. I don't know how wide a 6/7/8-speed chain is. I just know it's less than 3/32".
#8
Senior Member
These days you buy chains by the number of cogs on the cassette. All 10 speed chains now have about the same 5.9mm width and are completely interchangeable from a width standpoint and of course they all have the same 1/2 inch pitch.
If your bike is a 9 speed, any 9 speed chain should work.
If your bike is a 9 speed, any 9 speed chain should work.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) Count the number of cogs in the rear = speed of chain you need. It's obviously going to be 3/32. This needn't be mentioned when asking for $SPEED chain.
2) No, it's not. Pick one method and do it. Large large is quite simple. And give the shortest possible chain length. There are huge and lengthy debates on which one is "correct" or "better". Use search if you want to learn more about that
3) No.
2) No, it's not. Pick one method and do it. Large large is quite simple. And give the shortest possible chain length. There are huge and lengthy debates on which one is "correct" or "better". Use search if you want to learn more about that
3) No.
#10
Senior Member
The little/ittle method will produce the longest chain length and maximum wrap capacity from any RD. Route the chain through the RD as normal and make it as long as possible without hanging loose or rubbing the RD cage. If that length is not long enough, you have exceeded the RD's wrap capacity. I would never use a setup that exceeded the RD's wrap capacity. If you do that, then the chain will either hang loose in several of the smallest cogs or fail to wrap the big/big. The possible exception would be a triple, where the little ring and several of the smallest cogs are not used. The chain hanging loose in those cogs wouldn't matter.
#11
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
On compatible components, you still shouldn't get any slack chain in any combo. Ideally. A new bike shouldn't be spec'ed by a customer or the shop to have such a situation ideally.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Personally, I use the little-little. I usually use a 23 or 25 tooth cassette, but I keep a 27 around for hilly races. Since little-little gives you the longest possible chain, I don't worry about snapping the RD off if I swap cassettes.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
It does if, and only if, you stay within the total teeth capacity of the rear derailleur. Exceed that and little-little can result in a too short chain to accommodate big-big.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
That's true. But since I've never used anything bigger than a 27 (although lord knows I needed it), it hasn't been an issue.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
If I switch frequently between wheelsets with 12-23t, 12-25t and 12-27t cogs, then I should size the chain using the large/large method with my 12-27t cassette?
Right?
Or, would the 12-27t large/large sizing result in "too much chain" when I switch to a 12-23t cog wheelset?
Right?
Or, would the 12-27t large/large sizing result in "too much chain" when I switch to a 12-23t cog wheelset?
#16
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
If I switch frequently between wheelsets with 12-23t, 12-25t and 12-27t cogs, then I should size the chain using the large/large method with my 12-27t cassette?
Right?
Or, would the 12-27t large/large sizing result in "too much chain" when I switch to a 12-23t cog wheelset?
Right?
Or, would the 12-27t large/large sizing result in "too much chain" when I switch to a 12-23t cog wheelset?
#17
Senior Member
Of course if you're building for the public and not yourself, you have to assume the customer is clueless.
#18
Senior Member
Lucas...
What is often ommitted from the big/big explanation is that the ends of the chain that come togther may not match up. In that case you add 3 links, not 2.
The little/little method has no ambiguity to it. If you know the RD's wrap capacity is sufficient, you want the longest chain possible. With a 12-27, both methods should suggest the same length.
With a typical Shimano short cage RD, there is enough wrap capacity to handle any road cassette Shimano offers, using only one chain length.
What is often ommitted from the big/big explanation is that the ends of the chain that come togther may not match up. In that case you add 3 links, not 2.
The little/little method has no ambiguity to it. If you know the RD's wrap capacity is sufficient, you want the longest chain possible. With a 12-27, both methods should suggest the same length.
With a typical Shimano short cage RD, there is enough wrap capacity to handle any road cassette Shimano offers, using only one chain length.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 12-12-09 at 09:12 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Lucas...
What is often ommitted from the big/big explanation is that the ends of the chain that come togther may not match up. In that case you add 3 links, not 2.
The little/little method has no ambiguity to it. If you know the RD's wrap capacity is sufficient, you want the longest chain possible. With a 12-27, both methods should suggest the same length.
With a typical Shimano short cage RD, there is enough wrap capacity to handle any road cassette Shimano offers, using only one chain length.
What is often ommitted from the big/big explanation is that the ends of the chain that come togther may not match up. In that case you add 3 links, not 2.
The little/little method has no ambiguity to it. If you know the RD's wrap capacity is sufficient, you want the longest chain possible. With a 12-27, both methods should suggest the same length.
With a typical Shimano short cage RD, there is enough wrap capacity to handle any road cassette Shimano offers, using only one chain length.
#20
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
No there isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about.
3/32 is the internal width of chains, 6/7/8/9/10 speed chains are all "3/32". Only their outside width changed. The number 3/32 is nearly irrelevant to the OP. Any bike with 6+ gears is obviously going to be a 3/32 chain no matter what. As already mentioned the only thing you need to know is how many cogs you're running in the back = speed of the chain needed. The Trek bike the OP has is going to be 7 or more gears in the rear if it has the stock components.
3/32 is the internal width of chains, 6/7/8/9/10 speed chains are all "3/32". Only their outside width changed. The number 3/32 is nearly irrelevant to the OP. Any bike with 6+ gears is obviously going to be a 3/32 chain no matter what. As already mentioned the only thing you need to know is how many cogs you're running in the back = speed of the chain needed. The Trek bike the OP has is going to be 7 or more gears in the rear if it has the stock components.
I wish they told us how wide they are internally, in that case. That way, we could make more informed decisions and guesses about what chains will work with what other equipment.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.