Rear Derailleur Question..
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rear Derailleur Question..
Hi,
I have recently bought a Shimano Ultegra 6700 Chainset (Double chainring) 53/39t. In addition I have also managed to get a 6700 cassette off a mate which is 11/28... BUT i have no idea what size rear derailleur to go for. short, medium .... if someone could help me out here it would be much appreciated!
George
I have recently bought a Shimano Ultegra 6700 Chainset (Double chainring) 53/39t. In addition I have also managed to get a 6700 cassette off a mate which is 11/28... BUT i have no idea what size rear derailleur to go for. short, medium .... if someone could help me out here it would be much appreciated!
George
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Backwoods of Ontario
Posts: 2,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
28 tooth is the maximum for a road short cage, so that will work as long as you don't for a still larger cog in the rear. Medium and long cages will also work.
#4
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
This is a true bargain for a real Ultegra rear-derailleur:
https://www.cambriabike.com/shopexd.a...EAR+DERAILLEUR
And it will easily work with a 11 - 28T cassette - despite Shimano's claim no larger than a 27T. Shimano tends to be very conservative for no good reason. These run fine on up to 30T. Some are using these on 32T - but that's pushing it IMHO.
Anywho, that's a $80 to $110 rear derailleur.
https://www.cambriabike.com/shopexd.a...EAR+DERAILLEUR
And it will easily work with a 11 - 28T cassette - despite Shimano's claim no larger than a 27T. Shimano tends to be very conservative for no good reason. These run fine on up to 30T. Some are using these on 32T - but that's pushing it IMHO.
Anywho, that's a $80 to $110 rear derailleur.
#5
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+1 I bought one of those Cambria bike deals myself. And even if a short derailleur works, I don't see an advantage going with a short one. There is a lot more flexibility with medium or long cage derailleurs (who know next time you might want to go with a 11-28 cassette).
I bought the Cambria unit so I could make the swap to a 11/28 cassette myself. I just haven't gotten around to it yet.
+1 To comment below. Longer cage does not give you a larger rear cog, but it does allow for more chain wrap. So it give you more flexibility in managing front chain ring tooth differential and rear cassette differential.
I bought the Cambria unit so I could make the swap to a 11/28 cassette myself. I just haven't gotten around to it yet.
+1 To comment below. Longer cage does not give you a larger rear cog, but it does allow for more chain wrap. So it give you more flexibility in managing front chain ring tooth differential and rear cassette differential.
Last edited by wrk101; 12-29-09 at 10:33 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
Just to clarify.........all Shimano road derailleurs have an official largest cog compatibilty of 27t, as published by Shimano. This is for either cage length, it doesn't matter. The reason is that the cage length has nothing to do with the largest cog compatibilty (in regard to the upper pulley bumping into the largest cog on the cassette). In most cases, Shimano road derailleurs will actually work fine with largest cogs as large as 30t, as already stated.
In regard to the OP's specific drivetrain, the maximum chainwrap requirement (53 minus 39 plus 28 minus 11 equals 31) does exceed the official Shimano chainwrap capacity for their short cage road derailleurs (29t). In reality, a short cage Shimano road derailleur should work fine, as will the longer cage models.
Just keep in mind that largest cog compatibility and chain wrap capacity are two different things.
In regard to the OP's specific drivetrain, the maximum chainwrap requirement (53 minus 39 plus 28 minus 11 equals 31) does exceed the official Shimano chainwrap capacity for their short cage road derailleurs (29t). In reality, a short cage Shimano road derailleur should work fine, as will the longer cage models.
Just keep in mind that largest cog compatibility and chain wrap capacity are two different things.
Last edited by well biked; 12-28-09 at 07:55 PM.
#7
Senior Member
The specs for the new 6700 RD are a bit different than earlier models.
https://bike.shimano.com/publish/cont...SS.-type-.html
https://bike.shimano.com/publish/cont...SS.-type-.html
#8
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
The specs for the new 6700 RD are a bit different than earlier models.
https://bike.shimano.com/publish/cont...SS.-type-.html
https://bike.shimano.com/publish/cont...SS.-type-.html
#9
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times
in
18 Posts
You people need to understand how shimano comes up with their largest cog rating instead of blindly stating that it "usually" handles larger. The 27t figure you see bandied about here is a result of accomodating most derailleur hanger lengths. So people don't go omgwtfbbq when their derailleur at full max b-tension hits the larger cogs. If the bike has a shorter hanger than what shimano wrote that 27t rating for then it is possible for it NOT to work on a 27t or even a smaller sprocket. Reverse is true for longer.
Go read barnetts chapter 32 for the full on explanation.
Go read barnetts chapter 32 for the full on explanation.
#11
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
Good way to explain it. Thanks! Barnetts chapter 32? I have the full book on my HD. Perhaps I'll Copy & Paste job it. Shhh!
As an aside - I also have an Ultegra 6500-series RD on my road-bike. It has a 12 - 25T Miche cassette and 42 - 52T Campy Super Record (1982) crankset. Smooth and silent.
As an aside - I also have an Ultegra 6500-series RD on my road-bike. It has a 12 - 25T Miche cassette and 42 - 52T Campy Super Record (1982) crankset. Smooth and silent.
#12
Senior Member
There are more polite ways to educate readers of the forum. Suffice it to say that a longer hanger permits the use of a larger cog.
Quite often, a manufacturer will simply list the maximum cog size and wrap capacity to match the range of product they sell. Campy has done that in the past. The wrap capacity of their short cage RD magically increased when compacts came out and the 50/34 added 2T of wrap, even though the cage length was not increased. Campy includes a drawing of the hanger dimensions suggested for their RDs. The length ranges from 24 to 28mm. See page 12 of the PDF:
https://www.campagnolo.com/repository...leur-11-09.pdf
FWIW, the hangers on my LOOK frames are all of 28mm in length, maybe 29.
Campy also introduced a 12-29 11 speed cassette for 2010. 2009 RD might work with the 12-29, but only if the hanger is over 28mm in length. Otherwise, a revised "B" screw mechanism must be installed. All 2010 RD have the change to handle the 12-29.
The wrap capacity is also affected by the chainstay length. The perfect length that requires close to an exact 52, 53 ,54.... inch chain will have 2T more wrap capacity than a length that requires a length ending in a .5 inch increment. Derailleur chains can only be sized in full inch increments.
Quite often, a manufacturer will simply list the maximum cog size and wrap capacity to match the range of product they sell. Campy has done that in the past. The wrap capacity of their short cage RD magically increased when compacts came out and the 50/34 added 2T of wrap, even though the cage length was not increased. Campy includes a drawing of the hanger dimensions suggested for their RDs. The length ranges from 24 to 28mm. See page 12 of the PDF:
https://www.campagnolo.com/repository...leur-11-09.pdf
FWIW, the hangers on my LOOK frames are all of 28mm in length, maybe 29.
Campy also introduced a 12-29 11 speed cassette for 2010. 2009 RD might work with the 12-29, but only if the hanger is over 28mm in length. Otherwise, a revised "B" screw mechanism must be installed. All 2010 RD have the change to handle the 12-29.
The wrap capacity is also affected by the chainstay length. The perfect length that requires close to an exact 52, 53 ,54.... inch chain will have 2T more wrap capacity than a length that requires a length ending in a .5 inch increment. Derailleur chains can only be sized in full inch increments.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 12-29-09 at 01:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Drashkum
Bicycle Mechanics
20
02-12-17 08:45 PM
slowtridaddy
Bicycle Mechanics
9
12-04-11 07:22 AM