Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-10, 08:26 PM   #1
Laplacian
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 6 Pro
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
KMC Missing Link orientation (on Shimano 6700)

I tried search (other post wasn't clear) and google to no avail, so here goes.

What is the proper orientation of a KMC Missing Link installed on a chain? If it is being installed on the lower part of the chain and you are facing the drive side, should it be installed:

A. with the oval-type slot hole on the left and the pin on the right (for the outer half of the link, obviously);

or

B. with the oval-type slot hole on the right and the pin on the left (for the outer half of the link, obviously)

Picture of KMC Missing Link:

This picture is an example of option "B" above; option "A" would be the mirror image of the picture.

Thanks!

Last edited by Laplacian; 01-04-10 at 08:56 PM. Reason: added picture
Laplacian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-10, 08:43 PM   #2
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laplacian View Post
I tried search (other post wasn't clear) and google to no avail, so here goes.

What is the proper orientation of a KMC Missing Link installed on a chain? If it is being installed on the lower part of the chain and you are facing the drive side, should it be installed:

A. with the oval-type slot hole on the left and the pin on the right (for the outer half of the link, obviously);

or

B. with the oval-type slot hole on the right and the pin on the left (for the outer half of the link, obviously)

Thanks!
Makes no difference.

Both plates are idnetical. By the way, you'll need the missing link at the upper run of the chain, if you need to actually apply pressure to the chain to get it to seat properly.'

P.S The 6700 chain DOES have a correct orientation. The writing on the chain must be visible when viewed from the drive side.

Last edited by operator; 01-04-10 at 08:51 PM.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 05:42 PM   #3
Laplacian
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 6 Pro
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
Makes no difference.

Both plates are idnetical.
If you look at the picture of the KMC Missing Link above, the plates are identical but not symmetric. Therefore, the orientation does matter. The shape of the side with the pin is rounder while the side with the slot is more oval shaped. When downshifting, do you want the rounder side to contact the upper part of the cogs first or the oval side? It's a bit hard to describe, but does my question make sense?
Laplacian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 06:21 PM   #4
Davet
Licensed Bike Geek
 
Davet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Barriles, Baja Sur, Mexico
Bikes: Kirk Terraplane, Serotta Ottrott, Spectrum Super Custom, Hampsten Carbon Leger Tournesol
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
It's been my experience with KMC Missing Links for several years now, for thousands of miles on more than a handful of bikes, that the orientation doesn't matter on either the 9-speed or 10 speed links. I pay no attention to the orientation of the link when I install it, I just install it. I've had them on a variety of chains, including the new 6700 chain and they've always worked dandy.
Davet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 07:23 PM   #5
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,113
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
By the way, you'll need the missing link at the upper run of the chain, if you need to actually apply pressure to the chain to get it to seat properly.
I always install the master link on the lower run of the chain since it's a lot easier to get slack there using a "hairpin" tool to hold the loose ends of the chain in proximity. After the link is in place and pulled snug, I carefully crank it around to the top run and give the pedal a wack with my hand to assure the link is fully seated.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 07:51 PM   #6
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
I always install the master link on the lower run of the chain since it's a lot easier to get slack there using a "hairpin" tool to hold the loose ends of the chain in proximity. After the link is in place and pulled snug, I carefully crank it around to the top run and give the pedal a wack with my hand to assure the link is fully seated.
Precisely what I do. Except my hands are fragile, so I hold the rear wheel/tyre and push forward on the pedal instead.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laplacian View Post
If you look at the picture of the KMC Missing Link above, the plates are identical but not symmetric. Therefore, the orientation does matter. The shape of the side with the pin is rounder while the side with the slot is more oval shaped. When downshifting, do you want the rounder side to contact the upper part of the cogs first or the oval side? It's a bit hard to describe, but does my question make sense?
1 link out of an average of ~ 110-116 is going to affect shifting in any appreciable manner.

Last edited by operator; 01-05-10 at 07:54 PM.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 08:15 PM   #7
Laplacian
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 6 Pro
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
1 link out of an average of ~ 110-116 is going to affect shifting in any appreciable manner.
Okay maybe the orientation won't affect shifting. How about safety? Is one orientation safer?

I know a couple of you have said "no" but Shimano goes to a lot of trouble to tell us where to install the pin on their standard pin chains. This is an entirely differently shaped link--shouldn't installation be even more important? I don't really understand why Shimano says a certain way is a lot stronger for their fixed pin installation so I can't seem to apply that same logic here.
Laplacian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 09:00 PM   #8
Kimmo
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Bikes: velospace.org/viewcluster?c=873
Posts: 7,115
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
The Shimano deal is finicky cause it involves actual rivets IIRC.

This is a total no-brainer; hence the better option.
Kimmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-10, 09:36 PM   #9
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laplacian View Post
Okay maybe the orientation won't affect shifting. How about safety? Is one orientation safer?

I know a couple of you have said "no" but Shimano goes to a lot of trouble to tell us where to install the pin on their standard pin chains. This is an entirely differently shaped link--shouldn't installation be even more important? I don't really understand why Shimano says a certain way is a lot stronger for their fixed pin installation so I can't seem to apply that same logic here.
Whichever way you install it, it's the opposite on the other side. There can be no advantage strength wise, at least along the length of the chain. Again, if it was a safety issue, KMC would've stated this explicitly in their installation documents. They don't want to be sued anymore than you do.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-10, 08:46 AM   #10
DaveSSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Bikes: Two LOOK 585s, one KG461
Posts: 4,987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Regarding the joining pins, Campy insists that the end of the pin with the shoulder should be on the left side of the chain, so the pin installation is done from the left side.

When installing a second replacement pin in a Shimano chain, they say to push the new pin in the same direction as the old one was pushed out. That would most often place the shoulder on the right side, since most people work on the right side of a bike. They also show the original joining pin being pushed in from the right side.

As for the master link, I place the slotted end pointing toward the back of the bike, on the lower section of chain, as viewed from the right side - just the opposite of the the link in the picture. I do that only because it's required for a Wipperman connex link to work properly and has become a habit.
DaveSSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-10, 01:34 PM   #11
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveSSS View Post
When installing a second replacement pin in a Shimano chain, they say to push the new pin in the same direction as the old one was pushed out.
I'd like a rationale to why (official or not) they state this. I can only think of one reason.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-10, 01:53 PM   #12
DaveSSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Bikes: Two LOOK 585s, one KG461
Posts: 4,987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
I'd like a rationale to why (official or not) they state this. I can only think of one reason.
I'd say it has to do with potential burrs generated from pushing the old pin out. Better not to upset a burr by shoving a pin back from the opposite side.

The other reason might be potential damage to the hole in the outer plate. The right side might see damage, but not the left, since the peened end of the pin is pushed through the right side. The new pins have a little shoulder on the end that would be against the potntially damaged hole.

Both scenerios make sense.

Most chains I've used actually shear off a ring of peened material from the pin when it's pushed through. The drive pin on my chain tool has a collection of little steel rings on it.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 01-06-10 at 02:16 PM.
DaveSSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-10, 09:04 PM   #13
Laplacian
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 6 Pro
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks to all for the replies. One last question: is it safe to reuse the KMC Missing Link over and over? I find that removing the chain makes it easier to clean and lube. I would, of course, replace the KMC Missing Link when I replace the chain. But does it need to be replaced more often? I know some SRAM Power Links were 1-time use (although others re-use them also). Thanks.

(Not trying to start a debate on whether this is good practice or not, which lube to use, if you should ever clean a chain, etc.)
Laplacian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-10, 09:31 PM   #14
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laplacian View Post
Thanks to all for the replies. One last question: is it safe to reuse the KMC Missing Link over and over? I find that removing the chain makes it easier to clean and lube. I would, of course, replace the KMC Missing Link when I replace the chain. But does it need to be replaced more often? I know some SRAM Power Links were 1-time use (although others re-use them also). Thanks.

(Not trying to start a debate on whether this is good practice or not, which lube to use, if you should ever clean a chain, etc.)
It's fine.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 PM.