Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-10, 01:23 PM   #1
mainstreetexile
rain dog
Thread Starter
 
mainstreetexile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego
Bikes:
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
BB spindle length

I'm getting ready to buy a replacement for a worn out shimano lp26 68x116 bottom bracket. It looks like 116 isn't an option for spindle length on the newer shimano bb's (i'm planning on getting a un54), but they have 115 and 118. Sheldon's bb size database lists the usable lengths for my crank at 116-121, so I'm going to order the 118 length.

I know it's only 1 or 2 mm difference, so I guess this question is mainly for curiosity, but what (if any) effects would changing the spindle length have? Does it just mean having to adjust the front derailleur? Does a shorter spindle length give you a 'better' chainline?
mainstreetexile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-10, 01:55 PM   #2
BCRider
Senior Member
 
BCRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The 'Wack, BC, Canada
Bikes: Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline
Posts: 5,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For all practical purposes 115 = 116. Unless your crank arms or the teeth of the rings are a hair's breadth away from contacting the chain stay neither you nor the chain will notice the 0.5mm per side.

The chainline change going to 118 would depend on which gears you use most consistently. If the present chain line is angled inward as it runs to the rear then going another 2mm out will very slightly increase that angle and technically that is bad. Unless you enjoy a combo where the run is getting to a pretty sizable angle then 2 mm again won't mean diddly. But if you like running the big up front and middle 3 in the rear for the most part then you may as well go for the 115 provided the .5 mm won't mean an issue with the crank tips or ring teeth at the chain stay.

Technically you're also slightly affecting the Q value for your foot placement. For the sake of a 3 mm spread I doubt it would make a difference one way or the other unless you are a serious racer or have some sort of knee condition which would benefit from any tiny degree of help. But otherwise the average Joe or Jane would never notice in the slightest a 1mm shift one way or 2mm the other from where you have your pedals now. Technically going narrower is supposed to improve the Q for most folks. So it's another check mark for the 115 but I sure wouldn't bother if the chainline would see an improvement by going longer instead of more narrow.
BCRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-10, 08:10 PM   #3
mainstreetexile
rain dog
Thread Starter
 
mainstreetexile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego
Bikes:
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Excellent! Thanks for the information and advice, that shed some light on what determines a good chainline and I hadn't even heard of q value before.
mainstreetexile is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 AM.