gearing question for climbing....
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Petrolia, PA
Posts: 383
Bikes: '01 Cannondale CAAD5 3000si, Framed Minnesota2 Fattie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
..
..
Last edited by fixedgearinker; 01-22-10 at 09:47 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
The compact (assuming 50/34T chainrings) with a 27T cog gives a 34 gear-inch low gear. A 34T cog with your current 39T chainring gives a 31 gear-inch low gear. Based on what I've read about the Mt. Washington hill climb neither is low enough unless you are a Cat 1 or better rider.
Others who have ridden the climb say a 27 gear-inch low is an absolute highest low gear they would consider and lower, a lot lower, is better. I've heard of MTB cranks (42/32/22T chainrings) and a Xx32 or 34T cassette being used and they used the lowest gear they had. It's not just the incline, the wind can be ferocious too and that makes the hill far worse.
I see you are from my area. What gearing would you want to use to ride Sycamore St, Realto St. or Potomic Ave. into a stiff headwind if they were over seven miles long?
Others who have ridden the climb say a 27 gear-inch low is an absolute highest low gear they would consider and lower, a lot lower, is better. I've heard of MTB cranks (42/32/22T chainrings) and a Xx32 or 34T cassette being used and they used the lowest gear they had. It's not just the incline, the wind can be ferocious too and that makes the hill far worse.
I see you are from my area. What gearing would you want to use to ride Sycamore St, Realto St. or Potomic Ave. into a stiff headwind if they were over seven miles long?
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Petrolia, PA
Posts: 383
Bikes: '01 Cannondale CAAD5 3000si, Framed Minnesota2 Fattie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The compact (assuming 50/34T chainrings) with a 27T cog gives a 34 gear-inch low gear. A 34T cog with your current 39T chainring gives a 31 gear-inch low gear. Based on what I've read about the Mt. Washington hill climb neither is low enough unless you are a Cat 1 or better rider.
Others who have ridden the climb say a 27 gear-inch low is an absolute highest low gear they would consider and lower, a lot lower, is better. I've heard of MTB cranks (42/32/22T chainrings) and a Xx32 or 34T cassette being used and they used the lowest gear they had. It's not just the incline, the wind can be ferocious too and that makes the hill far worse.
I see you are from my area. What gearing would you want to use to ride Sycamore St, Realto St. or Potomic Ave. into a stiff headwind if they were over seven miles long?
Others who have ridden the climb say a 27 gear-inch low is an absolute highest low gear they would consider and lower, a lot lower, is better. I've heard of MTB cranks (42/32/22T chainrings) and a Xx32 or 34T cassette being used and they used the lowest gear they had. It's not just the incline, the wind can be ferocious too and that makes the hill far worse.
I see you are from my area. What gearing would you want to use to ride Sycamore St, Realto St. or Potomic Ave. into a stiff headwind if they were over seven miles long?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
Wow! I've heard about this climb for years, but I guess I never realized just how tough it is. I've ridden a lot of fairly long, steep, paved hills with mountain bike cranks (NOTHING like Mt. Washington, obviously), and I'm a spinner not a masher, but I'm having a hard time imagining a paved hill that would require 22/34 unless you were doing heavily loaded touring. Thanks for posting that-
#5
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,811
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 788 Post(s)
Liked 688 Times
in
367 Posts
Wow! I've heard about this climb for years, but I guess I never realized just how tough it is. I've ridden a lot of fairly long, steep, paved hills with mountain bike cranks (NOTHING like Mt. Washington, obviously), and I'm a spinner not a masher, but I'm having a hard time imagining a paved hill that would require 22/34 unless you were doing heavily loaded touring. Thanks for posting that-
This doesn't go very high, but this Portland ride would be good training for Mt. Washington:
https://www.opb.org/programs/ofg/segments/view/1728
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
I can definitely see the need for gears like that with loaded touring. I've had a couple of touring bikes with those gears myself, in fact. But what Hillrider is saying is that there are people who have come just to climb this thing and some of them are needing the absolute granny gear with a mountain bike drivetrain just to deal with the length, the grade, and the wind. That's BRUTAL!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 437
Bikes: late 80's bianchi campion d'italia, early 90's trek 2100, early 90's shogun selectra, mid 90's aluminum marin xcMTB, dept. store grade but upgraded columbia double eagle tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you mentioned in your original post (gone) that you were concerned about the posibility of balky shifting on the rear. assuming a ten speed casette, I wouldn't imagine the tooth difference between chainrings would be anything a good long cage rear derailleur would not be able to handle with ease. Remember, back in the days when you could only get 5 or 6 cogs on the back, people used to deal with ungodly tooth gaps between the largest cog or two and the rest if they wanted to climb really steep hills (and then pedal down them).
As far as the gear ratios not being as closely/nicely spaced, remember: you are climbing a mountain. Better to have a wider difference between ratios for the wider difference between grades that you are likeley to encounter.(I am not familiar with this climb.)
As far as the gear ratios not being as closely/nicely spaced, remember: you are climbing a mountain. Better to have a wider difference between ratios for the wider difference between grades that you are likeley to encounter.(I am not familiar with this climb.)
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Petrolia, PA
Posts: 383
Bikes: '01 Cannondale CAAD5 3000si, Framed Minnesota2 Fattie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you mentioned in your original post (gone) that you were concerned about the posibility of balky shifting on the rear. assuming a ten speed casette, I wouldn't imagine the tooth difference between chainrings would be anything a good long cage rear derailleur would not be able to handle with ease. Remember, back in the days when you could only get 5 or 6 cogs on the back, people used to deal with ungodly tooth gaps between the largest cog or two and the rest if they wanted to climb really steep hills (and then pedal down them).
As far as the gear ratios not being as closely/nicely spaced, remember: you are climbing a mountain. Better to have a wider difference between ratios for the wider difference between grades that you are likeley to encounter.(I am not familiar with this climb.)
As far as the gear ratios not being as closely/nicely spaced, remember: you are climbing a mountain. Better to have a wider difference between ratios for the wider difference between grades that you are likeley to encounter.(I am not familiar with this climb.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
clengman
General Cycling Discussion
16
08-20-18 12:44 PM
asp2011
Bicycle Mechanics
47
07-20-11 10:23 PM