Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Performance Difference Between Compact and Standard Cranks

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Performance Difference Between Compact and Standard Cranks

Old 02-04-10, 11:19 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
exRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 772

Bikes: Panasonic 500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Performance Difference Between Compact and Standard Cranks

I have 2 bikes, an Allez with a 50/34, and a Tarmac with a 53/39. The Allez had an R600/105 FD
setup, the Tarmac came with Ultegra.

The Tarmac alwas shifted smoother and quicker. I could adjust both the same way, and the 50/34
was noticably slower and noisier.

I have always been under the assumption that performance was more or less the same in that
range, it was just a weight/durablity difference.

So I had the LBS change the 50/34 to a 105-SL 53/39 Crankset (for reasons unrelated to this
question). At my request they did not adjust the FD, since I always go back and do that myself
anyway. All they did was replace the BB, Crankset, and Chain. BTW, both bikes are using CN-6600
chains.

After my adjustment the Allez now shifts just like the Tarmac. Just as smooth, just as quick.

I realize that I am now changing 14 teeth instead of 16 teeth, and that used to be an issue, but now
all modern FD's claim to work in that range. Has anyone else experienced this? Is it misleading to
tell someone that a 105 FD on a compact set will work just as well as anything else, or is the difference
between R600 and 105 that significant?
exRunner is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 11:28 AM
  #2  
Likes to Ride Far
 
Chris_W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,344

Bikes: road+, gravel, commuter/tourer, tandem, e-cargo, folder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Another factor is that even if the chainrings are similar quality, the 53 tooth is going to be stiffer than the 50 tooth because the 53 tooth has a larger BCD (130mm instead of 110mm). Stiffer chainrings up-shift better.
Chris_W is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarmacgreg
Road Cycling
11
07-11-17 03:34 PM
koolerb
Road Cycling
5
10-07-14 08:25 PM
Geoffmcc99
Bicycle Mechanics
12
08-02-14 05:12 PM
mlwarriner
Bicycle Mechanics
8
12-09-11 09:00 PM
canflyboy
Road Cycling
2
03-23-11 06:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.