Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-14-10, 04:41 PM   #1
calf man
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
calf man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atascadero, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Question on cranks compatible with bottom bracket

Hello,
I recently purchased a replacement set of cranks (2004 Campagnolo Centaur) on ebay and question if they are compatible with my existing bottom bracket (Shimano, early 90's).

Both use a square taper spindle, but the new cranks only slide partway onto the spindle. The bearing suface inside the cranks is about 3/4 inch, but the spindle only slides in about half an inch.

The old cranks slid pretty much all the way around the spindle.

Should I be concerned about using these two together? Should I get a replacement bb?

Thanks for the input.
calf man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-10, 04:48 PM   #2
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Posts: 12,258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
as you have found out, the two are not 100% compatible with each other.
they both look similar, but campagnolo uses ISO and shimano uses JIS which results in what you're seeing there.

You should look for an ISO square taper BB for centaur and below. Chorus and Record square taper uses yet another standard and will result in further complications.

I would check the sheldon BB spindle length database to see what you need.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-10, 06:13 PM   #3
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEO View Post
You should look for an ISO square taper BB for centaur and below. Chorus and Record square taper uses yet another standard and will result in further complications..
What? Explain this? Aren't they all ISO?
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-10, 01:40 PM   #4
cnnrmccloskey
Senior Member
 
cnnrmccloskey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland Oregon
Bikes: '82 Giante super challange, 70 Gitane Tour de France, GT Gutterball
Posts: 744
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bump

I'm curious about that too
cnnrmccloskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-10, 08:09 PM   #5
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,121
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
What? Explain this? Aren't they all ISO?
Yes, the tapers are all ISO but the spindles for Centaur and below are symetrical while Chorus and Record use asymetrical spindles.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-10, 12:19 PM   #6
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Have you tightened the crank bolts? Where the crank sits when you hand fit tit isn't where it'll sit when fully installed.

But I'd worry more about the chainline. Just because a crank will mount on a BB does not mean that it fits. The sprockets in front have to line up with the sprockets in back.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-10, 09:09 PM   #7
ultraman6970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Actually all the campagnolo BBs are iso, the problem is the length of them. Chorus and Record uses a 102 BB and the one u need is 111mm if im not mistaken. The spider arms may be set differently than in the High end stuff and that's why u need a longer axle.

Now, the shimano axle might work, again... it might work fine. It is not the ideal situation but it might work ok? (some people might say that it does not work, yes it might work fine), now i'll xplain why. The differences in the tapper are so minimal that sometimes u can get away with it, but the crank might set in the wrong position and u might start having problems with the chainline. Critical? maybe not because will be off maybe a few millimeters only..

What i would do is to check out the length of that shimano bb and do a test. U have to check it out.

Sometimes an axle looks way longer than other ones in numbers but is not that much sometimes... for example from 118 to 111 are 6 millimiters of difference, 6/2 = 3.. it means that u are off only 3 milimeters in both sides... thats not that much. (please do not think in track bikes, because the situation changes and 3 mms is a big difference)

I say test it, if it works fine great u save your self 50 bucks!.
ultraman6970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-10, 09:23 PM   #8
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
Yes, the tapers are all ISO but the spindles for Centaur and below are symetrical while Chorus and Record use asymetrical spindles.
sigh.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-10, 07:19 AM   #9
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,121
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
sigh.
Does that mean agreement, disagreement or what?
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-10, 08:43 AM   #10
ultraman6970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
all the 102 BBs are symetrical just in case, even the 111 the OP might need is symetrical too. Now if we are talking about the old campagnolo stuff, yes some ofthem uses asymetrical BB axels ... Hmmm not that i remember campagnolo record pista (the new stuff) uses asymetrical BB.
ultraman6970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-10, 10:05 PM   #11
calf man
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
calf man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atascadero, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks everyone for the feedback. Because the BB was about 20 years old, I was resigned to getting a new BB anyway. But I have a bigger problem - chainring bolts.

The crank set (from ebay) did not come with any bolts. I have a bunch of single speed chainring bolts that I thought would work, but I have found that campy uses a different standard than shimano. Two LBS's have stated that the five bolts I need would cost about $100.

So now, unless I can figure out a solution to the chainring bolt problem, it looks like I will be looking for another crankset - this time a JIS type.

PS, anyone want to buy a nice carbon campy crankset?
calf man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-10, 07:53 AM   #12
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,121
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraman6970 View Post
. Now if we are talking about the old campagnolo stuff, yes some ofthem uses asymetrical BB axels ... Hmmm not that i remember campagnolo record pista (the new stuff) uses asymetrical BB.
My 2006 Chorus crank uses an asymetrical Campy square taper bb.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-10, 09:59 PM   #13
calf man
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
calf man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atascadero, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I found an easy fix and thought I would bounce it off you guys.
The crank holes are too small for the female piece of std chain ring bolts (sleeve) to fit through so the chain ring could not be fully tightened to the crank.
I found by flipping the female pieces around and threading the bolt through the back end, the sleeve fits nicely into the chain ring holes, which are grooved.
Double length bolts with single length sleeves works nicely. Still plenty of clearance between the sleeves and the frame.
Any thoughts?
calf man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 03:24 AM   #14
Torchy McFlux
Senior Member
 
Torchy McFlux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver
Bikes: NOYB
Posts: 1,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not all square tapers are the same. Shimano bottom bracket spindle/crank tapers use the JIS standard, not ISO. Campy cranks should ideally be mated with a BB that has ISO tapers. That's why they don't seem to fit.
I don't understand what you're talking about with the chainring bolts. The female half will fit through the bores in one direction but not the other? That makes no sense.
Torchy McFlux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 11:32 AM   #15
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torchy McFlux View Post
The female half will fit through the bores in one direction but not the other? That makes no sense.
+1

Maybe he just wasn't trying hard enough. Sometimes you need to jiggle the chainring for the nut to go through, especially if things aren't clean.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 01:51 PM   #16
calf man
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
calf man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atascadero, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The holes in the 2004 (?) campagnolo centaur carbon crank are smaller than any I had seen before. The female end of the chainring bolts do not fit through the holes.
calf man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 02:46 PM   #17
Torchy McFlux
Senior Member
 
Torchy McFlux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver
Bikes: NOYB
Posts: 1,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh, the carbon version. They use special stepped bolts and I don't think there's any way around that. They are expensive too.

These guys have them for a relatively decent price:
http://ecyclingshop.com/index.php?ma...roducts_id=576
http://ecyclingshop.com/index.php?ma...roducts_id=577
http://www.harborcountrybike.com/CAM...p/crkp1086.htm
http://www.harborcountrybike.com/CAM...p/crkp1093.htm
You'll need 4 x FC-CH003, 4 x FC-CH010, 1 x FC-CH002, and 1 x FC-RE105

Last edited by Torchy McFlux; 02-26-10 at 03:09 PM.
Torchy McFlux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 02:47 PM   #18
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"grooved?" Do you mean that they're countersunk?
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 03:35 PM   #19
Ex Pres
#39
 
Ex Pres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: the 35223 (AL)
Bikes:
Posts: 6,339
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by calf man View Post
I found an easy fix and thought I would bounce it off you guys.
The crank holes are too small for the female piece of std chain ring bolts (sleeve) to fit through so the chain ring could not be fully tightened to the crank.
I found by flipping the female pieces around and threading the bolt through the back end, the sleeve fits nicely into the chain ring holes, which are grooved.
Double length bolts with single length sleeves works nicely. Still plenty of clearance between the sleeves and the frame.
Any thoughts?
If the bolts are tight, the rings are seated, and nothing's moving, I'd say you tricked Campy.
Ex Pres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-10, 05:46 PM   #20
calf man
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
calf man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atascadero, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMF View Post
"grooved?" Do you mean that they're countersunk?
Countersunk.
yes that's the word.
calf man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.