Spokeless Wheel
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 744
Bikes: '82 Giante super challange, 70 Gitane Tour de France, GT Gutterball
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Spokeless Wheel
Cross Posted in General Cycling Discussion
sorry if this is old news but I thought some people might be interested
https://www.******.com/r/technology/c...eless_bicycle/
sorry if this is old news but I thought some people might be interested
https://www.******.com/r/technology/c...eless_bicycle/
#3
You gonna eat that?
There's more weight in the last half of the bike because of all of the rim support. You can feel this most when you're turning.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 744
Bikes: '82 Giante super challange, 70 Gitane Tour de France, GT Gutterball
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 358
Bikes: Giant Defy2, Soul Faith
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's some pretty nice work for what's essentially a proof of concept. Much more thought paid to aesthetics than is usual for a prototype like that. I like how they figured out how to drive the rim by adhering a belt to the inside of the it. Very cool.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
Cross Posted in General Cycling Discussion
sorry if this is old news but I thought some people might be interested
https://www.******.com/r/technology/c...eless_bicycle/
sorry if this is old news but I thought some people might be interested
https://www.******.com/r/technology/c...eless_bicycle/
Now the squirrels can go though your wheel w/o problems!
#7
Senior Member
So repairing a flat looks to be quite a task.
#8
You gonna eat that?
Reading some of the comments, I can see where they were coming from. Why did they do it? Because it was novel. Maybe not perfect, but this is how you find stuff out. There may be side technologies (like that drive system) that might actually be the marketable invention.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Interesting but not novel. There have been several motorcycle wheels designed in a similar spokeless (aka "hubless") configuation but they have always remained novelties and never had any demonstrable advantage.
What I don't understand is the double sided crank. Why is the left side crank crossing over to a right side chainring needed? A regular right-side crank driving the rear "hub" would have been simpler and adequate.
What I don't understand is the double sided crank. Why is the left side crank crossing over to a right side chainring needed? A regular right-side crank driving the rear "hub" would have been simpler and adequate.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,707
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
An interesting gadget, but they forgot the first rule of good engineering and that's to identify a problem and provide a solution. Yes, they've removed the spokes for whatever that's worth, but at a cost of higher weight and less efficiency. What's next, a "tipless" bicycle that can't fall over?
The simple fact of the matter is that the traditional bicycle configuration survived and evolved for over 100 years because it's damned efficient; low weight - especially rotating weight & low power loss, plus the fringe benefits the resilience of spoked wheels offers in terms of rider comfort and traction.
I'm not saying there isn't room for innovation or creativity, but we best move forward by building on the lessons of the past rather than trying to re-invent the wheel.
One problem with engineering students and bicycle design is that many come from the automotive world, and aren't used to the constraints of a vehicle whose engine produces less power than that used in a typical car's audio system. The reality is that it isn't the bicycle that needs to be re-engineered, but almost everything else. Imagine the potential savings if all products could be brought to the bicycle's energy efficiency where 97% of input energy produces useful work.
The simple fact of the matter is that the traditional bicycle configuration survived and evolved for over 100 years because it's damned efficient; low weight - especially rotating weight & low power loss, plus the fringe benefits the resilience of spoked wheels offers in terms of rider comfort and traction.
I'm not saying there isn't room for innovation or creativity, but we best move forward by building on the lessons of the past rather than trying to re-invent the wheel.
One problem with engineering students and bicycle design is that many come from the automotive world, and aren't used to the constraints of a vehicle whose engine produces less power than that used in a typical car's audio system. The reality is that it isn't the bicycle that needs to be re-engineered, but almost everything else. Imagine the potential savings if all products could be brought to the bicycle's energy efficiency where 97% of input energy produces useful work.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 02-17-10 at 08:48 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
ah, here: https://files.conceptcarz.com/img/sbarro/osmos2.jpg
From an engineering perspective this usually falls into the category of "doable, but pointless". To keep the rim tracking you need very fine tolerances and fairly high contact pressure. Contamination of the trackway (where the rim is clasped) is a huge issue.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
this could have a future in circus acts. combining the clown riding the bicycle with the lion (or squirrel) jumping through the hoop.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#14
Bike addict, dreamer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 5,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Adam
#16
You gonna eat that?
They were just playin' around for a grade, not trying to rattle the foundations of the cycling world. If you read the comments you can see the problem they were trying to solve was not to accomplish some quantum improvement in cycling technology; the problem was to get them a good grade. If I were the professor here, I would also ask for an analytical writeup of what they produced; that would be potentially more educational than actually producing the project.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,707
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
That's the way I looked at it at first too, but come on- it was a college student project to look at alternate ways of doing things. They were supposed to design it differently and they did. I'm sure they learned a lot about why the common spoked wheel is the current standard. For projects like this you have to judge it based on the assignment the professor assigned (in this case using a different implementation of a common machine), and not based on its market success.
When I was in school, we couldn't get a project approved until we first justified a need and how we were improving on the current state of the art. Just building gadgets wouldn't cut the mustard. So, I'd hope that they were prepared to demonstrate that it was somehow more efficient, less costly, or otherwise some improvement on the current standards. I give them points for originality (though it has been done before) and creativity, and possibly for problem solving, but overall it's short of what I'd consider a truly worthy effort. BTW- if they had some other application for their drive system and wheel and used this only as a demonstration, then I'd give them better marks.
I also have a few questions about their thinking. For example, driving from the top of an unsupported rim (no spokes) required a rim structurally rigid enough to support the axle load. Had they put the driving spur at the bottom, possibly using a swing arm, the rim would only support weight in compression from the tire to drive spur, allowing for a much lighter rim and a simpler design. It's that kind of question that makes me give them low marks.
As I said, I'm a tough grader, but I'd hope that today's engineering schools challenged their students more and better prepared them to think critically about their designs.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
someone design me a disc wheel that won't catch wind.
I'm tired of squirrels trying to jump between my spokes.
I'm tired of squirrels trying to jump between my spokes.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#19
You gonna eat that?
Incredibell Brass Duet
Squirrels almost always run directly away from the sound. Works like a charm.
Squirrels almost always run directly away from the sound. Works like a charm.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Incredibell Brass Duet
Squirrels almost always run directly away from the sound. Works like a charm.
Squirrels almost always run directly away from the sound. Works like a charm.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 188
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd hope that they were prepared to demonstrate that it was somehow more efficient, less costly, or otherwise some improvement on the current standards. . . . I give them points for originality (though it has been done before) and creativity, and possibly for problem solving. . . . As I said, I'm a tough grader, but I'd hope that today's engineering schools challenged their students more and better prepared them to think critically about their designs.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,707
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
Maybe they weren't being evaluated according to any of your criteria. The ability of the end product to improve on current bicycle technology might not have been the point of the task. The point of the project could have been to learn project management, or gain experience in fabrication/design techniques, or problem-solving within a novel and unfamiliar set of constraints, e.g. 'your constraint is to build a wheel without spokes, supported from the top', or to demonstrate the application of some specific mechanical principles and theory in a functioning device.
My comments were based on the totality of the project as an engineering/design project, where there seems to be weakness in the research into the prior art, and practicality of their concept. When I was in school, we were always challenged about the why of our designs, not only the what and how., and that's what I would have loved to have seen discussed more.
Given that spokeless rim drive cycle designs are over 100 years old, including one where the rider sat within the wheel, they can't exactly claim novelty, so it would be nice to know what they thought they were bringing to the table.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#24
Senior Member
There's SO many shortcomings in this as a valid system for a viable bicycle that it's not funny. But since we don't know what the rules were that they were operating under we can't know what they were trying to achieve and why they went with this option. But they got it running after solving a lot of sticky issues I'm sure.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
It's to gear up the chain speed. If you think about it the cog belt inside the rim is like a rim size rear sprocket. To get the wheel to turn at the proper gear inch value the step up given by using the middle crankset as a jackshaft is required.
There's SO many shortcomings in this as a valid system for a viable bicycle that it's not funny. But since we don't know what the rules were that they were operating under we can't know what they were trying to achieve and why they went with this option. But they got it running after solving a lot of sticky issues I'm sure.
There's SO many shortcomings in this as a valid system for a viable bicycle that it's not funny. But since we don't know what the rules were that they were operating under we can't know what they were trying to achieve and why they went with this option. But they got it running after solving a lot of sticky issues I'm sure.