Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

what factors determine the strength of a wheel?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

what factors determine the strength of a wheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-10, 10:49 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 1,982

Bikes: 2007 Rocky Mountain Sherpa 30 (bionx), 2015 Cannondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
what factors determine the strength of a wheel?

I have a few wheelsets:

1. Mavic A-319, 36 spokes, shimano LX hubs
2. Shimono Ultegra 6600 (wheels & hubs), 20R/16F spokes
3. Mavic Open Pro, Ultegra hubs, 28 spokes

The Mavic A-319's are on a touring bike. The Ultegra 6600 are on a 17 lb carbon fiber road bike. Open Pros are a spare set of wheels.

I have never broken a spoke or had the wheels go out of true in 3 years of riding. Most of the road conditions that I ride on I would rate as good to excellent. I am a heavy rider (225 lbs) and I thought that I would have problems by now with the low-spoke count wheels. The salesperson at the LBS did not have any concerns with the low-spoke wheels and said to me that he expected that they would be every bit as strong and durable as the 28-spoke Open Pros.

What do you think? Are the Ultegra wheels just as strong/durable as the Open Pros? I know that the A-319's are the strongest of the bunch just by the sheer weight, number of spokes, and design of the rims. I've always been under the impression that the number of spokes was the most significant factor in determining the strength of a wheel (assuming that the quality of the build is constant.) Am I wrong? And I'm talking about reasonable quality wheels... not the type you would get on a department store bike.

Should I be worried at all about the 20R/16F spoke count wheels? They have been fine for this long.
InTheRain is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 10:55 PM
  #2  
OldSchoolSuperGoosePKRipp
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6

Bikes: At the present moment, Haro Nyquist Back Trail 24, GT Air, Raleigh MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am not familiar with the type of wheels you have, I do different type of riding. The spoke lacing pattern, has a factor in strength. Radially laced, mainly looks, 3 or 4 laced are what I use, but again I do different riding.
oldschoolsgoose is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 03:21 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
Originally Posted by InTheRain
.... I've always been under the impression that the number of spokes was the most significant factor in determining the strength of a wheel (assuming that the quality of the build is constant.)
First off you need to be a bit more specific about what you mean with "strong". Is it durability or lateral rigidity? These two characteristics can end up in conflict.

And, as always for assembled units, there is no single component that alone determines the strength/durability of the finished product.
There's a balance between rim rigidity, the spoke tension the rim can take before collapsing into a taco, the spoke tension the rim can take before the nipples pulling through, the spoke tension the hub/rim configuration will allow for DS/DNS, the stretchiness of the spokes and so on.
One of the few things that just about never is an issue is the sheer tensile strenght of the spoke.

Durability is mainly about keeping the spokes tight, but not at the cost of collapsing or breaking the rim.
A wheel with a high spoke count but a radially soft rim can be less durable than a wheel with a low spoke count but a radially very rigid rim.
A wheel with a high spoke count but a radially soft rim and butted spokes will be more durable than the same rim laced with regular spokes.
a wheel with a radially very rigid rim can have good durability even with regular spokes.

Main issue with low spoke count wheels tends to be that if you pop a spoke they tend to go more out of true than their multi-spoked counterparts. For my 32-spoke commuter losing one is pretty much a non-issue in terms of rideability.
On a secondary note it does put more stress particularly on the nipple/rim interface, which has to be designed accordingly.
dabac is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 07:01 AM
  #4  
Bikaholic
 
blamp28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western, Michigan
Posts: 1,461

Bikes: Trek Fuel 90, Giant OCR, Rans Screamer Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by InTheRain
(assuming that the quality of the build is constant.)
Dabac said it well. The only thing I would add is that an assumption that build quality is consistant can only be made if you know the builder's record for this. I never assume a wheel is well built and always check for balanced and adaquate tension. These two factors are the most important as far as the "build quality" component if we were to assume equivalent components. I realise you probably know this but it is not at all uncommon to assume a consisten level of build quality where it may be lacking. A lighter rider can get away with such an assumption and is not as likely to ever know the diference. As a heavy rider myself, I have found a real value in getting my wheels as close to perfect as I can.
blamp28 is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 07:19 AM
  #5  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
higher build quality required for wheels with fewer spokes.
or conversely, you can get away with a poorer build quality when using a wheel with more spokes and a lighter load.
If the wheel with higher spoke count is loaded up enough, be it heavier rider or more rugged terrain, it can easily show signs of poor build quality.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 07:57 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times in 138 Posts
How many miles have you put on the Ultegra wheels? At your weight I would say that you are lucky not to have some problems.
I don't like the rear freehub. The axle support is niboard on the drive side. It is worse that a freewheel hub.
davidad is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 08:38 PM
  #7  
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times in 371 Posts
Originally Posted by davidad
How many miles have you put on the Ultegra wheels? At your weight I would say that you are lucky not to have some problems.
I don't like the rear freehub. The axle support is niboard on the drive side. It is worse that a freewheel hub.
Shimano puts no weight limit on any of their wheels, regardless of spoke count.
Dan Burkhart is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 10:09 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
MrCjolsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac

Main issue with low spoke count wheels tends to be that if you pop a spoke they tend to go more out of true than their multi-spoked counterparts. For my 32-spoke commuter losing one is pretty much a non-issue in terms of rideability.
On a secondary note it does put more stress particularly on the nipple/rim interface, which has to be designed accordingly.
I broke a spoke on a 36 sp wheel, and didn't even know until I put it on the stand for a periodic truing.
MrCjolsen is offline  
Old 04-11-10, 06:25 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Rims.

The bike hangs off the rim via the spokes.

I've had less trouble with strong rimmed low spoke count wheels than light rimmed 32-36 wheels.
bikejack is offline  
Old 04-12-10, 02:59 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Originally Posted by davidad
How many miles have you put on the Ultegra wheels? At your weight I would say that you are lucky not to have some problems.
I don't like the rear freehub. The axle support is niboard on the drive side. It is worse that a freewheel hub.
Has Shimano ditched their superior freehub design?

Why on Earth would they do that?
Kimmo is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SesameCrunch
Folding Bikes
16
06-30-13 03:05 AM
mjolniir
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
37
11-03-12 03:19 PM
pstock
Bicycle Mechanics
5
08-31-12 01:27 PM
LaSarthe
Road Cycling
5
01-08-10 10:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.