cyclocomputer calibation observations
#1
Arizona Dessert
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
cyclocomputer calibation observations
Just wanted to share some observations:
For a 26x1.95 Shimano Crossroads ex tire at 80psi:
Cateye Astrale 8 manual recommends setting circumference to 2050mm. By using the mark tire with paint and roll out with me on bike (235lbs inc. bike) I get 2057mm. A very minor (0.3%) difference.
For a 700x28C Continental gatorskin at 100psi:
Cateye Astrale 8 manual recommends 2136mm. Roll out method (220lbs inc. bike) I get 2093mm. That is a 2% difference, significantly larger, but still not huge (the difference between a 100mi and a 102mi ride)
I think I've read that some Continental tires are undersized to what is marked on tire. (That is a 28mm tire is more like 25mm in true size). Apparently some manufacturers do this so if folks compare tire weights for marked sizes the tire that is actually smaller will then be lighter. I didn't check, but I'll get the calipers out tonight.
But maybe there is something else going on. For what its worth my commute reads 9.58mi on multiple rides for both bikes after roll out calibration.
Any thoughts? Any other experiences?
Al
For a 26x1.95 Shimano Crossroads ex tire at 80psi:
Cateye Astrale 8 manual recommends setting circumference to 2050mm. By using the mark tire with paint and roll out with me on bike (235lbs inc. bike) I get 2057mm. A very minor (0.3%) difference.
For a 700x28C Continental gatorskin at 100psi:
Cateye Astrale 8 manual recommends 2136mm. Roll out method (220lbs inc. bike) I get 2093mm. That is a 2% difference, significantly larger, but still not huge (the difference between a 100mi and a 102mi ride)
I think I've read that some Continental tires are undersized to what is marked on tire. (That is a 28mm tire is more like 25mm in true size). Apparently some manufacturers do this so if folks compare tire weights for marked sizes the tire that is actually smaller will then be lighter. I didn't check, but I'll get the calipers out tonight.
But maybe there is something else going on. For what its worth my commute reads 9.58mi on multiple rides for both bikes after roll out calibration.
Any thoughts? Any other experiences?
Al
#2
Two wheel escape!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 78
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Read the article under Sheldon Browne for calculating settings. This really set me straight on what number should be used. I always used the Nashbar suggested numbers and found that I was 2% off as well. Every 20 miles I would gain .25 over my riding partner. Sheldon's formula for a 700 x 23 is 622 +23 + 23 =668 * 3.14 =2097
#3
Arizona Dessert
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Interesting that you mention Sheldon's tire sizes. I looked at those as well here are the results:
Tire: ---------------- Cont. gator 700x28C --- Shimano C.Rd. 26x1.95
Cateye Manual: --------------- 2136 --------------------- 2050
Roll-out measured: ------------ 2093 --------------------- 2057
Sheldon - radius calculated: - 2111 --------------------- 2036
Sheldon - look up table: ----- 2136 --------------------- 2055
I trust the roll out measurement the most as it eliminates all other variables (tire pressure, unaccurate tire labeling, rider weight, etc.)
So is the continental gatorskin 700x28C really a 23mm tire?
Al
Tire: ---------------- Cont. gator 700x28C --- Shimano C.Rd. 26x1.95
Cateye Manual: --------------- 2136 --------------------- 2050
Roll-out measured: ------------ 2093 --------------------- 2057
Sheldon - radius calculated: - 2111 --------------------- 2036
Sheldon - look up table: ----- 2136 --------------------- 2055
I trust the roll out measurement the most as it eliminates all other variables (tire pressure, unaccurate tire labeling, rider weight, etc.)
So is the continental gatorskin 700x28C really a 23mm tire?
Al
Last edited by noisebeam; 08-26-04 at 12:05 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 816
Bikes: Raleigh, Benotto, Schwinn, Trek
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have three bikes with computers. In each case the computer sizing chart was incorrect. I also roll out the tyre on the garage floor with me on the bike to get the correct reading.
#5
Breaker of Spokes
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 493
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I always do a roll out. A roll out is always going to be more accurate. My method is to do 3 separate roll outs and then average the 3.
#6
Arizona Dessert
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by P. B. Walker
I always do a roll out. A roll out is always going to be more accurate. My method is to do 3 separate roll outs and then average the 3.
The main reason for this posting was I was surprised at how big a difference from the recommended chart (2136) compared to the roll out (2093). It is like my 700x28 tires give the circumference of a 700x23 tire. Has anyone else noted such a difference?
Al
#7
Breaker of Spokes
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 493
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Yeah, that is why I did the roll out and did average four tries (each was within 2mm of the other.) My neighbors must have thought I was nuts as I did it after dark with a flashlight. There I was closely inspecting the road on my hand and knees with a flashlight and tape measure.
The main reason for this posting was I was surprised at how big a difference from the recommended chart (2136) compared to the roll out (2093). It is like my 700x28 tires give the circumference of a 700x23 tire. Has anyone else noted such a difference?
Al
The main reason for this posting was I was surprised at how big a difference from the recommended chart (2136) compared to the roll out (2093). It is like my 700x28 tires give the circumference of a 700x23 tire. Has anyone else noted such a difference?
Al