Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    can someone explain the physics of stem face plates?

    i'm some what paranoid at how such a thin piece of aluminum holds so much weight. this is what supports the handlebar which you rest your upper body weight when descending and when you pull on the handlebars when climbing. it's hard to believe but true. is my understanding of the physics incorrect? doesn't the faceplate take a lot of the weight? by the way, does my faceplate look safe enough?











    Last edited by common man; 06-03-10 at 04:02 PM.

  2. #2
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,255
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well, I think it's quite rare that you'll be on the bars in a way to load up the faceplate only.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AEO View Post
    well, I think it's quite rare that you'll be on the bars in a way to load up the faceplate only.
    true, that's why i pedal a little harder when going up the hill to put more weight on seat and pedals rather than the bars.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    9,183
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why are your screws not the same?
    Stem screws are a good place to use a 1/4 inch drive torque wrench. But don't exceed the torque specs for the handlebar or steer tube, as well as the stem.

  5. #5
    Bianchi Goddess Bianchigirll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Camp Hill, PA
    My Bikes
    Too many to list here check my signature.
    Posts
    20,543
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=Al1943;10908537]Why are your screws not the same? QUOTE]

    good question. and why does it look all chewed up by the screw holes?
    Bianchis '87 Sport SX, '90 Proto (2), '91 Boarala 'cross, '93 Project 3, '88 Trofeo SOLd, '86 Volpe, '89 Axis SOLD, '79 Mixte SOLD, '99 Mega Pro XL Ti SOLD, '97 Ti Megatube, , '90 something Vento 603,

    Others but still loved,; '80 RIGI, '80 Batavus Professional, '87 Cornelo, '86 Bertoni (sold), '09 Motobecane SS, '98 Hetchins M.O., '09 K2 Mainframe SOLD, '89 Trek 2000, '?? Jane Doe (still on the drawing board), '90ish Haro Escape

  6. #6
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,255
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    my guess is that the replacement bolts did not have washers.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,973
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That little piece of Aluminum is a lot stronger than you think and is capable of supporting any reasonable stress you can put on it. In an accident, you will tear out the bolts before the faceplate itself breaks.

  8. #8
    Senior Member BCRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The 'Wack, BC, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline
    Posts
    5,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not to mention that you're WAY overthinking the issue and making a lot of incorrect assumptions along the way.

    For example the clamping plate sees only a small fraction of your weight that you put on the bars. And it's seeing it at an angle that is mostly focusing the load down into the main part of the stem. Unless you're in the habit of doing bicycle trials nose bounces while standing on the bars with your feet the faceplace and bolts will only see MAYBE an 1/8 of your overall weight even during an aggresive downhill braking maneuver.

    Besides, there is more than enough clamping action from just the four bolts and the corners of the faceplate that form locking tabs to wedge the bars into place to take even your whole weight.

    If you really do need something to worry about stop and consider the massive wedging loads put on the corners of a typical square taper BB and what it is trying to do to the crank arms. THAT will keep you up in a cold sweat at nights thinking about it and make you forget this frivilous concern over the stem's faceplate
    Model airplanes are cool too!.....

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    salesman sold me my first bike with an adjustable stem that was set at a 40 degree rise on the floor. when i adjusted the stem later, i had to rotate the bar so the brake levers would be properly angled. i didn't know anything about bike mechanics so i overtightened the aluminum bolt and it broke off. i took it to the lbs and they replaced it with a steel bolt without washers.

    now i know better. i will go to another lbs and have them replace all the bolts with new bolts + washers with proper torque & make sure my face plate is not compromised from the prior over-torquing. then i'll never ever mess with a wrench again. i just need this bike to last me until last week of august when the 2011 trek 6000 comes out (hopefully with shimano drive train + better paint job than 2010 model).

    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    That little piece of Aluminum is a lot stronger than you think and is capable of supporting any reasonable stress you can put on it. In an accident, you will tear out the bolts before the faceplate itself breaks.
    wow - that's pretty impressive. good to know.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BCRider View Post
    Not to mention that you're WAY overthinking the issue and making a lot of incorrect assumptions along the way.

    For example the clamping plate sees only a small fraction of your weight that you put on the bars. And it's seeing it at an angle that is mostly focusing the load down into the main part of the stem. Unless you're in the habit of doing bicycle trials nose bounces while standing on the bars with your feet the faceplace and bolts will only see MAYBE an 1/8 of your overall weight even during an aggresive downhill braking maneuver.

    Besides, there is more than enough clamping action from just the four bolts and the corners of the faceplate that form locking tabs to wedge the bars into place to take even your whole weight.

    If you really do need something to worry about stop and consider the massive wedging loads put on the corners of a typical square taper BB and what it is trying to do to the crank arms. THAT will keep you up in a cold sweat at nights thinking about it and make you forget this frivilous concern over the stem's faceplate
    i'm sure you're right that i'm overthinking. i was (am) a newbie and i wish i hadn't overtightened the stem bolts (which was corrected by lbs). that's what got me worried. i won't make the same mistake again. this is a hybrid that i ride just for fitness up hills. next bike will be a trek and once its set up i'll never ever tinker with it again. i was even tempted to entirely replace the stem but that would require me to change handlebar too (because i'd want 31.8 instead of current 25.4). i don't want to overdo it especially when i'll get a new bike later this summer. although of course, i don't want to try to save money and then end up with an injury. i think i should just relax
    Last edited by common man; 06-03-10 at 05:06 PM.

  11. #11
    Junior Member DethWshBkr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Jonestown, PA
    My Bikes
    1996 Trek 5500 Ice Fire (rare!) 1996 Trek Y-33 (yellow), 2008 Trek Fuel EX-9
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nah - minimal stress I believe. I know I don't worry about it.

    If you think that is alot of stress - think about a motocross bike! Jumping 100+' and 20+' high and landing a 235 pound machine! Held together also by little bolts only.

  12. #12
    Senior Member BCRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The 'Wack, BC, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline
    Posts
    5,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm surprised that it had aluminium bolts. That's just NUTZ! By all means replace the whole lot.

    If the bike is any good then it's still got a mission in life as a local area errand bike for runs to the grocery store, video store and other such "menial" tasks. As such it's worth sorting out and setting it up as a cargo bike with racks and bags. Don't diss it just because it's not a sports car. We need pickup trucks as well! ! !
    Model airplanes are cool too!.....

  13. #13
    Quirky Grifter LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    21,418
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    If your bike never leaves the ground while you ride and you aren't a super buff sprinter, I wouldn't worry about it.

    BUT, if you even so much as jump off the occasional curb, I'd go ahead and replace the stem and bar (since its finish looks all chewed up to the right of the stem.)

    Even the cheapo $20 bar/stem combo deals from pricepoint would garner more trust in a landing than your current set-up.

    What's that gewgaw hanging under your bar there? Bell? Light?

    Man, I can't imagine aluminum screws in there either! That's CRAZY!
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  14. #14
    Senior Member BCRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The 'Wack, BC, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline
    Posts
    5,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't hesitate to jump that bike off curbs or even a two foot drop, given that it's a hybrid. The so called "damage" looks far worse than it is due to the close up nature of the pictures. But I wouldn't be jumping or even riding far with only aluminium screws holding it together. THOSE gotta go!!!
    Model airplanes are cool too!.....

  15. #15
    Quirky Grifter LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    21,418
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Even with fresh screws I'd be worried about trusting any adjustable stems to many curb drops. I'm pretty wary of worn aluminum bars also, since I've seen someone snap 'em and I've bent a pair. Although you're right, that does look like superficial surface wear on the bar, I gotta wonder how it got there. doesn't look like it was from an accessory mounting, since it seems to go right up to the clamping area, almost like it was clamped off center for a while, or???

    The hybrid nature of the bike doesn't bother me at all, however. I ride off 1 ft curbs on road bikes all the time.

    Regardless if I bought a used bike with stem and bars in that condition, I'd replace both immediately. If I'd bought the bike new, I'd replace the stem with a solid one the instant I found out what angle I liked it at, and I'd figure I might as well go for the bar replacement too, since it's only maybe $5-10 more than getting just a stem shipped out to me.
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    lol thanks for your advice guys. i'm thinking a bontrager ssr mtb stem ($30) + bontrager earl riser 710 mm wide with a 50 mm rise ($50). i know risers look ugly but i need it because my current handlebars are too low and hurt my back. i want the handlebar to be level with my saddle. i like sluggish steering so i don't want the earl stems (70 mm max length) which anyway may not be compatible with my hybrid.

    i tested a $10 bontrager chromoly 80mm rise handlebar as an experiment before considering more expensive stuff (a compatible bontrager b-dot, 2 bolt stem for this riser is only $15). the riser was very ugly but it was much more comfortable. all trek hybrids & mtbs come stock with bars that rise 25.4 mm. i don't do jumps or drops but climb big hills and sometimes ride jittery gravel roads.







    if you look at this side view, there may be torque due to the rise radius that will want to rotate the handlebar around the stem, especially when climbing a steep hill. this was just a test so i didn't *perfectly* align the handlebar 90 degree to stem. i'll get the lbs' assurance that the earl & ssr stem are a good match and that this set up is reliable.

    50 mm rise or 80 mm rise are both fine. i'm only opting for the more expensive earl + ssr set up because i'm thinking its more dependable and may give me the freedom to bike on jittery, gravel roads. besides, 50 mm rise will have 37% less torque than 80 mm rise.

    this is how my bike is currently configured. a 120 mm 10 degree stem will increase the reach which i want. the riser handlebar will avoid the need for a steep stem angle. everything will be done by the reputable lbs (bikeline in pennsylvania) and NOT by me. once it's set up i'll never ever tinker.


  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Terre Haute, Lafayette, or Indianapolis, IN, depending on the day
    My Bikes
    n, I would like n+1
    Posts
    1,917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^Those first couple pictures make it look like your handlebars are backwards.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ yeah i had realized that but figured i was just talking about the stem. it looks that way because the almost vertical stem angle. now that i started talking about handlebars i felt i'd have to clarify with other pictures

    Quote Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets View Post
    Although you're right, that does look like superficial surface wear on the bar, I gotta wonder how it got there. doesn't look like it was from an accessory mounting, since it seems to go right up to the clamping area, almost like it was clamped off center for a while, or???
    that's not surface wear. i think there was sticker there that i tried to peel off and some of the paper & adhesives remained.

    yes, i will definitely replace the aluminum bolts rofl...

  19. #19
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,507
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's a lot more metal in the stem's faceplate than in the cross-section of the handlebars. When was the last time you snapped a handlebar? Humans are amazingly weak compared to metals.

    And it's actually the bolts that take the load... in single-shear no less...

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    7,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That faceplate is in pretty bad shape, why? Once you put it in besides a few minor adjustments in the bolts there is nothing else to do, the holes are ovalized for example, grease everywhere, I would buy a new one if i was you.

  21. #21
    jwa
    jwa is offline
    moron
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice job on the pics, though....

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1
    Posts
    8,849
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by common man View Post
    yes, i will definitely replace the aluminum bolts rofl...
    Put a magnet on those bolts when you remove them. I highly doubt they are aluminum. Steel can be finished in many different ways and can often look like aluminum especially with a matte finish.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^ just use macro mode (flower symbol) on a simple point and shoot camera to get detailed close ups.

    Quote Originally Posted by ultraman6970 View Post
    That faceplate is in pretty bad shape, why? Once you put it in besides a few minor adjustments in the bolts there is nothing else to do, the holes are ovalized for example, grease everywhere, I would buy a new one if i was you.
    tomorrow i'm going to a reputed lbs to have them install bontrager ssr oversized stem + bontrager earl riser bar. the stuff you see pictured are going to the recycle bin. this will give me a peace of mind and insure safety. i'll check with them too that the 50 mm riser bar does not rotate around the stem clamp while i'm climbing hills since it is subject to a torque of the radius 50 mm. once the trek 2011 models come out in late august...i'm getting me a 6000 mtb bike

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by joejack951 View Post
    I highly doubt they are aluminum.
    it's aluminum. it's much lighter than the steel bolt and broke off very easily when i overtightened it the first time not realizing that i should have my lbs do it with a torque wrench (lesson learned). i'll check with the magnet though. i'm not taking chances with aluminum bolts but i assume that the bike manufacturer fuji (not as famous as trek or specialized but reputed nevertheless) considered the physics of it. i bet those bolts are just fine for tensile stress or whatever stress it takes to keep the faceplate together. of course, i'll make sure to have lbs use steel bolts tomorrow

  25. #25
    Senior Member BCRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The 'Wack, BC, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline
    Posts
    5,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Going back a step or three. The riser handlebars on that original setup WERE backwards. Very definetly backwards. No doubt about it. Your wrists must have felt like they were being subjected to the Spanish Inquisition.

    When you get some new riser bars make them look the opposite...


    .... waits patiently now for the first Monty Python fan to post....

    There's a few decent brand name stems that can be had with a 25 to 30 degree angle. That and some mid range riser bars would give you a level with the saddle or only very slightly below fit.
    Last edited by BCRider; 06-06-10 at 10:52 PM.
    Model airplanes are cool too!.....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •