Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-10, 02:01 PM   #1
TurbineBlade
Kid A
Thread Starter
 
TurbineBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Square taper bottom bracket love?

Anyone still partial to square taper, or is everything external now? I was thinking that I've had really good mileage on my square taper stuff....and continue to use it on my daily ride.

I was debating an upgrade, but don't know if it's worth it.
TurbineBlade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:04 PM   #2
Cynikal
Team Beer
 
Cynikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Bikes: Too Many
Posts: 5,935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
I have several square tapered cranks and also octalink, isis and several external cranks. There are even 2 BB30's thrown in there. I think they all work fine. I really doubt you will find a big upgrade in cranks. You can lose some weight but for stiffness, look to the frame over cranks.
Cynikal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:05 PM   #3
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,559
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Parts is parts. Any good quality bottom bracket set up, loose ball, sealed bearing, square taper, whatever is functionally indistinguishable from the most expensive, newest external bearing BB. And yes, I ride a square taper BB.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:05 PM   #4
josephjhaney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I went from Square Taper to Isis Guess I didn't really upgrade, but the price for the crank was so good, I couldn't help myself. Love Nashbar, and I can't complain, I got over 10,000 miles out of my triple before the middle ring started to show signs of wear.

Joe
josephjhaney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:15 PM   #5
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,881
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 893 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurbineBlade View Post
Anyone still partial to square taper, or is everything external now? I was thinking that I've had really good mileage on my square taper stuff....and continue to use it on my daily ride.

I was debating an upgrade, but don't know if it's worth it.
It might be a replacement, but I don't think it'll necessarily be an upgrade.

I'm still riding square taper for the simple reason that not one of my original cup & spindle bottom brackets ever needed replacement. If and when they die, or if I build something new and don't have a choice I might try a more modern BB, but it'll be hard to beat life expectancies of 10+ years, and 10's of thousands of near zero maintenance, trouble free, all weather miles.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:36 PM   #6
canopus 
Senior Member
 
canopus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kingwood, TX
Bikes: 1985 Cannondale SR300, 1985 Cannondale ST400, 1984 Trek 760, 1984 Trek 610, 1984 Trek 720, 1981 Trek 710, 1979 Trek 710, Gary Littlejohn Cruiser, BMX
Posts: 1,218
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I've got enough chainrings and if need be replacement arms along with a serviceable BB that I suspect I will be buried with my square tapers. Can't see a real reason to replace it. It works. It works good. It works real good.... Nope, no reason to replace them.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
canopus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:50 PM   #7
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 22,193
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1138 Post(s)
new stuff seems like a take it or leave it fixed set, can't add a 3rd chainring and just switch out the BB
for one say 5mm longer on the right end
because the Arm and BB tube are a fixed set, so you have to buy the whole crankset.

fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 02:53 PM   #8
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 18,308
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 420 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurbineBlade View Post
Anyone still partial to square taper, or is everything external now? I was thinking that I've had really good mileage on my square taper stuff....and continue to use it on my daily ride.

I was debating an upgrade, but don't know if it's worth it.
If they ain't broke, don't fix 'em.

However, it is broke, go with external. It's not the stiffness or the weight...good points in their own right... that makes external bottom brackets attractive, it's the ease of installation. The Shimano system is just about as idiot proof as any mechanism can possibly be. The Shimano bottom bracket/cranks do for the drivetrain what threadless headsets did for forks, i.e. makes installation simple. Total installation time is around 15 minutes and 10 minutes of that is finding the tools
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 04:47 PM   #9
Booger1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
Bikes:
Posts: 3,730
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Square taper = K.I.S.S principle.

How much easier does it get than tightening a bolt/nut?
Booger1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 05:45 PM   #10
Dan Burkhart 
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Bikes:
Posts: 6,060
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Most of my bikes run square taper, including a brand new one I just finished building this week. There ain't much wrong with the system in my humble opinion.
__________________
Gearhubs demystified and other cool stuff.


WANTED: Dead or broken gearhubs for failure analysis.

Like the shop
Dan Burkhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 06:05 PM   #11
TurbineBlade
Kid A
Thread Starter
 
TurbineBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Fair enough! I've really not had any issues either honestly. The way some folks talk it's like they're completely obsolete and no one uses them anymore!
TurbineBlade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 06:18 PM   #12
davidad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,950
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
I am one of the obsolete ones. There is no need for the new and improved BB's other than marketing.
The external bearings require that the BB be faced accurately or they fail. They are not serviceable, just throw away parts.
davidad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 06:19 PM   #13
revelstone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UTAH
Bikes: centurions (lemans and sports dlx both 1981)
Posts: 127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i agree with cyccomute. if it aint broke....... if your feet go round, and the bike goes forward, ya done good. keep your money and buy a cold one after your ride. that'll work.
revelstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 06:38 PM   #14
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah nothing wrong with square taper except you can get 10/11s compatible cranks with that interface. But other than that if you want to retro grouch go right ahead.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 06:38 PM   #15
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidad View Post
I am one of the obsolete ones. There is no need for the new and improved BB's other than marketing.
The external bearings require that the BB be faced accurately or they fail. They are not serviceable, just throw away parts.
Yeah, no square taper or octalink BB's needed to have the BB faced either. In fact those tools were entirely superfluous. I wasn't aware that all cartridge square taper BB's were serviceable. That's news.

Get with the times people.

Last edited by operator; 08-02-10 at 06:48 PM.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 06:53 PM   #16
RT
The Weird Beard
 
RT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Bikes:
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I own one of each: ST on my cyclo build, and external on my Cross Comp. I cannot tell the difference on a 30 mile ride. If maintenance/replacement is needed, I'll go with whatever is least expensive in comparable quality. ST removal/installation is also a piece of cake.
RT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 07:01 PM   #17
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTDub View Post
I own one of each: ST on my cyclo build, and external on my Cross Comp. I cannot tell the difference on a 30 mile ride. If maintenance/replacement is needed, I'll go with whatever is least expensive in comparable quality. ST removal/installation is also a piece of cake.
Right, it's much harder to remove self extracting one bolt cranks for example, 10 speed sram. Stop grasping for advantages that aren't there.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 07:07 PM   #18
bkaapcke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3,232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Da Vlnci cranks, Phil Wood BB. Yup, I'm sticking with what I have. bk
bkaapcke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 07:53 PM   #19
badamsjr
17yrold in 64yrold body
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern CA
Bikes:
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
After 'upgrading' to external bearing BB, I found that I could not get the low gears I needed for my setup (30t small ring was not low enough). Went 'back' to square taper and an XTR 900 crank so I could put a 24t small ring on it. Has worked well for me, and I can tell no difference in stiffness or any of the other 'advantages' of the external.
badamsjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 07:57 PM   #20
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,117
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Another unrepentant square taper user here. I have square taper bbs on three bikes including a 10-speed Campy Chorus triple and have had excellent service life from all of them, both cup-and cone and cartridge.

Note to operator: Campy made several 10-speed compatible square taper bbs and cranks in Record down through at least Centaur versions. I expect they would work just fine with Campy 11-speed too.

I do have Octalink bbs on two bikes and they have been fine also but I see little to no performance difference between them and square taper.

I haven't made the move to an external cup bb and crank on anything yet since the old ones refuse to die.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 10:03 PM   #21
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 18,308
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 420 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booger1 View Post
Square taper = K.I.S.S principle.

How much easier does it get than tightening a bolt/nut?
Square taper doesn't equal K.I.S.S. To work on the crank you need: something to remove the dust cap, a 14mm socket or allen wrench (could be 6, 7, or 8 mm), a crank puller, and a bottom bracket extractor to match the flavor of bottom bracket you have. If you are using the old cup and cone system, you'll need a lock ring spanner, a pin spanner and a fixed cup tool. That's up to 7 different tools.

For an external bottom bracket crank, you'll need a bottom bracket tool and and allen wrench. Two tools. Much simpler. Like I said earlier, external bottom bracket does for cranks what threadless does from headsets.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 10:53 PM   #22
Jeff Wills
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
 
Jeff Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Bikes:
Posts: 8,066
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurbineBlade View Post
Anyone still partial to square taper, or is everything external now? I was thinking that I've had really good mileage on my square taper stuff....and continue to use it on my daily ride.
I went from square-taper to Octalink... and now I'm back to square-taper. Sealed cartridge instead of cup & cone, though. My legs can't tell the difference.
__________________
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 11:17 PM   #23
fuzz2050
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
fuzz2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 3,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyccommute View Post
Square taper doesn't equal K.I.S.S. To work on the crank you need: something to remove the dust cap, a 14mm socket or allen wrench (could be 6, 7, or 8 mm), a crank puller, and a bottom bracket extractor to match the flavor of bottom bracket you have. If you are using the old cup and cone system, you'll need a lock ring spanner, a pin spanner and a fixed cup tool. That's up to 7 different tools.

For an external bottom bracket crank, you'll need a bottom bracket tool and and allen wrench. Two tools. Much simpler. Like I said earlier, external bottom bracket does for cranks what threadless does from headsets.
Not to mention, with a square taper comes the risk of not torquing down the crank bolt, going for a ride, and rounding the formerly square taper. Or, you can be two beers in, decide to try half step gearing, and forget to remove the crank bolt washer, and tear the threads out of a crank, making removal a real chore.

All of my bikes have square taper, but that's just what's cheaply available, it has some issues.
fuzz2050 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-10, 11:52 PM   #24
RT
The Weird Beard
 
RT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Bikes:
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've done about 10 square taper BB replacements and each time it got easier. In fact, 2-10 were all the same: About 10 minutes total, and $15 worth of tools (purchased on sale of course).

And a trusty roll of teflon tape.
RT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-10, 12:25 AM   #25
snafu21
Senior Member
 
snafu21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: The Mangroves, UK
Bikes: None.
Posts: 1,896
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Square taper with cup 'n cone is Industrial Revolution age technology. The ball bearing was invented for the bicycle and up-market Edwardian bikes were advertised with 'balls all round.'

Square taper is said to be bettered for race use by larger diameter hollow spindles, which are said to be 'stiffer' and reduce flex. Standard cup 'n cone B/Bs are prone to water and mud ingress when combined with lack of maintenance.

But, for me, the square taper on my two humble bikes has yet to wear out, or break. Spares are available world-wide.
snafu21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.