Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-04, 12:01 PM   #1
Stregone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern VA, USA
Bikes: '98 Cannondale Super-v 700, '07 Specialized SX Trail III, '15 Gravity Zilla Monster Cross
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What is better about a better derailleur?

Whats the difference between a $40 derailleur and a $120 derailleur? Honest question, I'd really like to know
Stregone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 12:04 PM   #2
Indolent58
Queen of France
 
Indolent58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Look 565, Trek 2120
Posts: 3,799
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
$80 and weight
Indolent58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 02:00 PM   #3
monkeyscribeAZ
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Landshark Road/Soul Cycles Single Speed
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Better derailleurs generally have better bushings in their pulleys. The cheapest are just plastic spinning on steel. The better ones have either ceramic bushings or cartridge bearings, which are both smoother and last longer.

As mentioned, weight is also generally a factor.

On the road bike, where derailleurs last a long time, the nicer ones may be worth it, but I’ve ruined way too many riding mountain bikes to ever think about spending the $$ on an XTR.
monkeyscribeAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 02:57 PM   #4
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,614
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
In a word, "crispness".
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 02:58 PM   #5
sydney
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indolent58
$80 and weight
Bling and poseur' points too.
sydney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 03:08 PM   #6
WorldWind
Hardtail
 
WorldWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Az. & Ca.
Bikes: Richey Everest, Supercomp, Richey custom handbuilt Road, and others.
Posts: 663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The better components are easer to install, and adjust.

They stay in adjustment longer and function better.
WorldWind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 07:43 PM   #7
roadbuzz
Just ride.
 
roadbuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: C-ville, Va
Bikes:
Posts: 3,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you want better shifting, get better levers. If you want to go faster, get better wheels. Either one will cost more than the derailleur. If you've got crappy levers, it's unlikely you'll notice any benefit from the new derailleur!

If the overall bike is of a good enough quality to upgrade, upgrading the derailleur is pretty far down the list, IMO. If not, you get a lot more bang for the buck buying a better bike!
roadbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-04, 08:33 PM   #8
Stregone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern VA, USA
Bikes: '98 Cannondale Super-v 700, '07 Specialized SX Trail III, '15 Gravity Zilla Monster Cross
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The bike is pretty good, its an old cannondale super v. I really like it. I'm giving it a total overhual over the next several months, in a few steps. First step is the drivetrain. Its rather worn, and the rear derailleur is tweaked slightly, but I want upgrade to 9 speed anyways So I'm trying to decide what derailleur (and shifter) to get.

I don't mind spending some good cash to get quality, but not so much that I'm spending $50 more for something only slightly better. I'm trying to figure out where that point of deminishing returns is at.
Stregone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 03:59 AM   #9
roadbuzz
Just ride.
 
roadbuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: C-ville, Va
Bikes:
Posts: 3,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oops. That's a mtn bike, isn't it? I'm out of my area of expertise. In any case, if you're upgrading to a different number of rear cogs, you may have to upgrade shifters... not sure about mtn bike components.
roadbuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 04:26 AM   #10
Stregone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern VA, USA
Bikes: '98 Cannondale Super-v 700, '07 Specialized SX Trail III, '15 Gravity Zilla Monster Cross
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah its an mtb. I forgot this isn't an mtb specific forum so I didn't mention that. oops
Stregone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 06:45 AM   #11
Al.canoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 1,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The four "more modern" mountain bikes we've owned came with the cheaper front deraileur (just below below LX). They did fine until they wore some. Then they would take much longer to shift and would not stay adjusted. We've used LX, XT and XTR with about 7 bikes (4 ATB and 3 road) over the years. I'd say XT is a little faster shifting than LX. XTR is about the same as XT, but it's a lot more ruggedly built. For my money, LX is the best value. XTR has gotten too expensive; they don't discount it like they used too anymore. Probably due to the decline in the value of the dollar.

For the rear, our only experience is with LX and XT. I have never noticed a difference for the rear.

Al
Al.canoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 09:27 AM   #12
seely 
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,087
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You can tell a pretty huge difference between say Alivio and XT, but go from XT to XTR and there isn't much of a perceptible difference. Same for like Tiagra vs. Ultegra vs. Dura Ace. I do like using XTR rears on my mountain bikes becuase they do last forever, and are rediculously smooth. On my road bike I have an old Ultegra 600 (probably 10-12 years old) and its smooth like butter. For the fronts anything goes... they all basically work the same and shift the same. If you have LX/105 or better shifters you will notice a difference in response and the smoothness as well.
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 10:08 AM   #13
SanDiegoSteve
Senior Member
 
SanDiegoSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego
Bikes: Felt Fc, Litespeed Ghisallo, beach cruiser
Posts: 278
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Spring quality and tension are the biggest. Those translate into the "crisper" shifting as well as chain slap/suck control (different springs for both).

The pulleys make a little bit of difference.

For your own perception (maybe your buddies too), there might be some cool factor.

I really question weight. The weight of dirt in your tires will be more than what you save, but to some, every gram counts.

On the road, I ended up with the top end Dura Ace through a good deal. Love it.
On the trails, I go middle of the road since I tend to fall/hit things that lower the life span. XTR is nicer than XT for sure, but at the replacement price point, I've been very happy with XT.
SanDiegoSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 10:21 AM   #14
sydney
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WorldWind
The better components are easer to install, and adjust.
Really??...........
sydney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 10:23 AM   #15
seely 
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,087
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As far as I know, with XTR you still have to screw it onto the hanger, set the limits and fuss with cable tension. Same as Alivio
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 10:32 AM   #16
sydney
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
As far as I know, with XTR you still have to screw it onto the hanger, set the limits and fuss with cable tension. Same as Alivio
....and attach the cable.
sydney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 12:15 PM   #17
sorebutt
Über member!
 
sorebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
Bikes: 2004 Albert Eisentraut
Posts: 993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"better" dérailleurs are made better with more expensive an lighter materials. However, there is a point of diminishing return, when you go to more expensive dérailleurs. As you go higher in teh groupo hierarchy you pay more and more for a smaller and smaller return for your money..

Typically the mid point in the groupo hierarchy is the best value. Ex: Ultegra or Centaur...
sorebutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-04, 10:18 PM   #18
Balance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton
Bikes: 97 thin blue line rigid mtb, mid 80s norco monterey sl, gave away the rest recently
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've used older altus, alivio, acera x, lx, and xt rear derailleurs. As well as lots of really crappy ones. I've never done a test of trying out each one with the same shifters, but I certainly noticed a differenc on the way up the hierarchy. On the road it's neglible, but obviously on the trail the difference is more profound. I don't know if they still make it, but the acera x was just fine, the lx works no problems (8 years old and been crashed), as long as I keep it tuned right, and the xt was a bit better. But for me the lx is just right because it's what's sitting on my bike right now. No need to upgrade. For my front derailleur I had an stx-rc and it was pretty good, a little finicky with tuning, but that seized up steel/aluminium stylee. So now I've got an old alivio on there and I really don't notice a difference. I'm running 8 speed xt shifters. The biggest upgrade to your shifting is knowing how to tune them right, and making sure all your parts are compatible. Right now I'm running too big of a third chainring, so I'm having to fudge the setup, forcing me to shift the front more often to avoid rubbing. I'm either going to change my front shifter to an old exage friction thumbshifter, or take of the big ring and put a bashguard on and be done with it. More offroading or more touring with the trailer... tough choice
Balance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-04, 07:59 PM   #19
smurfy
Senior Member
 
smurfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Bikes:
Posts: 1,157
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You can really tell the difference in a racing situation. I was once in a mtn bike race with an STX-RC group and an LX rear derailler (and Gripshift) and the shifting was very sloppy! It shifted fine just riding around.
smurfy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-04, 09:13 PM   #20
Balance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton
Bikes: 97 thin blue line rigid mtb, mid 80s norco monterey sl, gave away the rest recently
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I find the biggest difference in performance is between my bike (lx rear, stx-rc front, xt shifters) being freshly tuned or not quite right. When it's tuned right I have no problems. Of course someone else could hop on my bike and have troubles because they wouldn't know the what little tricks to use in each shifting situation. You know what I mean. When your setup isn't running quite right and you hold that shifter in a bit to force the chain over, then ease it up. Or when it's really bad and shift up twice and down once. hehehe When my setup is freshly tuned there's is a slight bit of that, but since the bike has seen 8 years of heavy use, I guess I'm not too worried about it. It's all part of the experience. More organic
Balance is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 PM.