Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Trek Navigator 2.0 rear axle

    Looking to buy a Nav 2.0...I am told I am too heavy for the 'free-wheeling' rear axle (250 lbs) and that I should upgrade to the 3.0 since it has a 'cassete'-type rear axle and will support my weight....Am I being 'upgraded' by a salesperson needlessly?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,151
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just looked at Trek's web site and they say the rear is a cassette, not a freewheel. If that's the case the seven would be OK.
    You would be too heavy for a freewheel because the right side bearing is inboard near the hub flange. The axle is unsupported out to the dropout and prone to bending and breakage.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks so: Cassette:Shimano 14-34, 7 speed
    means the Shimano 14-34, 7 speed is NOT free wheeling? Sorry if I sound ignorant, because I am....

  4. #4
    Herasmus B Draggin One Way Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    My Bikes
    Many, often
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At 250lbs, you need strong wheels. You won't find them on a 2.0. The cassette wheels allows for better support of the axle so it won't bend. It looks like, from the website description that the rim is a double wall on the 3.0 which, as far as I am concerned, is a must for a heavier rider. Freewheel type hubs often have bent axles due to the amount of unsupported axle that sticks out from under the freewheel. A salesperson told you that? Sounds more like a mechanic to me. Good advice either way....

    EDIT: davidad is wrong about the spec. "Cassette" is a default description on the site. They use it everywhere, even on single speed cruisers! He's right about everything else, though! That bike has a Shimano TZ31 7-speed 14-34 freewheel. The 3.0 is the only cassette-equipped Navigator.
    Last edited by One Way Rider; 09-14-10 at 05:14 PM.
    Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks...looks like a 3.0 for me....is the 2.0 okay for my 130 lb wife? Other components good?

  6. #6
    Mechanic/Tourist
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    My Bikes
    2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Would have more bikes if I had time to ride them all. Previous bikes: 1968 Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fav), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.
    Posts
    5,368
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, no argument that a cassette wheel will be stronger. But for other 250 pounders reading this, don't assume that a freewheel bike is out of the question. I do believe people of that weight and more rode bikes before cassettes existed!

  7. #7
    Herasmus B Draggin One Way Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    My Bikes
    Many, often
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cny-bikeman View Post
    I do believe people of that weight and more rode bikes before cassettes existed!
    They sure did.....but......axle spacing at the time was mostly 120 or maybe 126, and most decent hubs had chromoly axles, which means that not only were axles shorter, they were also stronger. Now we have 135mm spacing and the lower quality axles (which are hollow due to the QR) bend much more easily.

    Nav 2.0 sounds fine for your wife given her weight.

    Let us know how things turn out.
    Last edited by One Way Rider; 09-14-10 at 09:31 PM.
    Working on your own stuff is either a labor of love, or a love of labor...

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    City of Brotherly Love
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
    Posts
    1,170
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Navigator 2.0 has a freewheel. The Navigator 3.0 has a cassette.

    Shimano never made a 14-34 cassette with MegaRange. The MegaRange cassette is 11-34.
    Any cluster with an 11 or 12 tooth cog is a cassette.

    You might want to take this discussion to the Clydesdale forum.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern/Central VA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Sirrus, Univega Activa ST Hybrid, 70's Schwinn Traveler, Giant Innova, Nishiki Mixte
    Posts
    213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was 290 and riding a single wall rim with freewheel and had no issue for 2 years at 90 miles a week. Get the spokes tensioned properly, avoid potholes and curbs and you should be ok.
    The tyranny of a multitude is a multiplied tyranny.

    When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.

    - Edmund Burke

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Im no bike mechanic but last year in Aug I bought a new Trek Navigator 2.0, at that time I weighed 318lbs, I bought the bike to lose weight. I started out riding the bike 4 miles per day, and worked my way up to 12 miles per day until the middle of Nov, after my lap band surjury last Feb I again started riding the bike in early April 12 miles per day, I road the bike six days a week until the end of June, when I got down to 240lbs I bought a road bike. My Trek has been a good solid bike the only issues I've had with the Trek is from last year, I broke one spoke, and the wheel needed trueing once, other than that I've had NO problems what so ever with my Trek Navigator 2.0.
    Paul

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,386
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gundogblue View Post
    ..I bought a new Trek Navigator 2.0, at that time I weighed 318lbs,....the only issues I've had with the Trek is from last year, I broke one spoke, and the wheel needed trueing once, ...
    But we're not dealing with absolutes here, we're playing the odds. Freewheel hubs do put more strain on the axle, there's no doubt about that.
    But even if the margins to failure are smaller doesn't mean that failure is guaranteed.
    Riders who are lucky, careful and good at going light can get away with a lot of things that other riders(of the same or lesser weight) will get in trouble by.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •