Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member auchencrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    9,718
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Bottom bracket Spindle length question, for cottered to cotterless.

    I would like to install a square drive cotterless crank on and old Raleigh Grand Prix, and I noted that that BB shell is 71mm instead of the usual 68. I know I need to use a longer spindle, so that the lock-ring will still engage the threads on the adjustable cup.

    Supposedly Italian bottom bracket spindles are longer, but are expensive and only marginally longer.

    I understand that old MTB bike spindles are longer long enough to accommodate a 73mm shell.

    Q - Can I assume that any junky MTB I find would have such a suitable spindle?
    - Auchen

  2. #2
    Mechanic/Tourist
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    My Bikes
    2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Would have more bikes if I had time to ride them all. Previous bikes: 1968 Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fav), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.
    Posts
    4,547
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-362857.html

    What you use partly depends on the chainline you will have on the back of the bike. It's not just length but how far out the chainwheel will be.

  3. #3
    Senior Member auchencrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    9,718
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Hi cny-bikeman!

    Indeed, I have a 42mm chain line to maintain, and a Sugino JIS sq taper crank. I never know what this means for exactly how far out the spindle needs to be, but past experiece tells me it's better to err a little on the wide side. I am assuming a MTB JIS bottom bracket made for a triple would do just that.

    Right? Wrong?
    - Auchen

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Generally, if the chainline of the front rings are a few mm's further out than the rear chainline... it's no problem. Matter of fact, a lot of bikes are built this way. It depends on the shape of the crank arms, meaning how offset they are from the square taper.

    MTB triple BB's are not necessarily any wider, the cranks are completely different.
    Last edited by duckforcover; 09-20-10 at 06:45 PM. Reason: spalling
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    City of Brotherly Love
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
    Posts
    934
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What you have is a Raleigh BB. Velo Orange has a threadless BB that may work for you. You also might want to check with a frame builder to determine if it would make sence to mill the BB shell to 68mm.

  6. #6
    Insane Bicycle Mechanic Jeff Wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    other Vancouver
    Posts
    6,418
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by auchencrow View Post
    I understand that old MTB bike spindles are longer – long enough to accommodate a 73mm shell.
    No. You're confusing spindle length with bottom bracket shell width. Spindles made for a 73mm width shell have the bearing races further apart than those made for 68mm BB. Both were available in a variety of overall spindle lengths, although spindles for 68mm width shells were much more common than those for 73mm width shells. Complicating matters is that different grade BB cups will be different thicknesses, so the way we did it back in the day is by grabbing a selection of BB spindles and keep trying until something worked.
    Jeff Wills

    All my bikes.

  7. #7
    Senior Member auchencrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    9,718
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I'm familiar with the VO and milling options, and I knew that either would be cost prohibitive, so I think I'm going to have to take a chance with a No5 spindle, or search vainly for a No7. Every one I have is a No3. . .
    I can't remember where I read it, but once I saw something about MTB spindles being made for wider shells, and if they're JIS taper I was thinking it would go. Ah well.
    Apart from paying through the nose on eBay for an Italian bb, I may just stop by the coop and nose around, or alternatively, just stick with cottered. (I'm doing this for a flip and already I won't see $25 margin on it, even in the spring.)
    Thanks very much all.
    - Auchen

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what was wrong with the cottered crank? just wondering...

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,770
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I assume your Raleigh has Raleigh's proprietary 26tpi threading. When we converted a friend's '73 Super Course from the OEM Stronglight (which was neither strong nor light) cottered crank to a Suguino square taper crank, we kept the old Raleigh cups and just replaced the spindle. The cups were deep enough that we were able to use the lockring with the spindle intended for a 68 mm bb shell.

  10. #10
    Senior Member auchencrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    9,718
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by larry_llama View Post
    what was wrong with the cottered crank? just wondering...
    It's missing a chain ring bolt and I have extra alloy cranks doing nothing. An alloy crank would facilitate maintenance for its future owner.
    - Auchen

  11. #11
    Senior Member auchencrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    9,718
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    I assume your Raleigh has Raleigh's proprietary 26tpi threading. When we converted a friend's '73 Super Course from the OEM Stronglight (which was neither strong nor light) cottered crank to a Suguino square taper crank, we kept the old Raleigh cups and just replaced the spindle. The cups were deep enough that we were able to use the lockring with the spindle intended for a 68 mm bb shell.
    Your 26tpi assumption is corect.
    It sounds like you and your friend really lucked out. The replacement spindles I cuerently have allow the adjustable cup to go flush with the shell.
    - Auchen

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    for a flipper, i'd just keep the cottered cranks and spend the money saved on a bikesmith cotter press :-)

  13. #13
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Chicago NW 'burbs
    Posts
    2,480
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I did this mod in the eighties, we always used a old fashion spindle with the thread for the crank fixing nuts , not bolts. A 3T was the right size if I remember correctly.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •