Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-19-10, 08:41 AM   #1
Eres
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Is this bike to small for me?

Hi

I am interested in buying a Litespeed Vortex 1999, that is a size 53. It is a private deal, which is why the size can't be changed. For more info about the bike.http://www.litespeed.com/archives/lscatalog1999.pdf

I wonder, if this is to small for me? I would like your oppinion about it, so ask all the questions you want.

Thanks you for reading.

My measurements in centimeters.
-------------------------------------------
Inseam: 83
Trunk: 63.5
Forearm: 33
Arm: 61
Thigh: 56.5
Lower Leg: 53.5
Sternal Notch: 144.5
Total Body Height: 174
Eres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 09:08 AM   #2
cyclist2000
Senior Member
 
cyclist2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Bikes: Masi (retired), Giant TCR, Eisentraut, Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo (trainer bike), Cannondale, 84 Stumpjumper, Waterford(N+1), Tern D8 (N+1), looking for a Ti frame
Posts: 3,024
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
use an online sizing spreadsheet like the one found on competetive cyclist. Have you even tried the bike?
cyclist2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 09:29 AM   #3
Eres
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyclist2000 View Post
use an online sizing spreadsheet like the one found on competetive cyclist. Have you even tried the bike?
I have used the competetive cyclist calculater, and no its not possible for me to try the bicycle.

The competive site gives me three kinds of fits:

The Competitive Fit (cm)
-------------------------------------------
Seat tube range c-c: 53.8 - 54.3
Seat tube range c-t: 55.4 - 55.9
Top tube length: 53.5 - 53.9
Stem Length: 10.7 - 11.3
BB-Saddle Position: 76.8 - 78.8
Saddle-Handlebar: 50.9 - 51.5
Saddle Setback: 3.9 - 4.3


The Eddy Fit (cm)
-------------------------------------------
Seat tube range c-c: 55.0 - 55.5
Seat tube range c-t: 56.6 - 57.1
Top tube length: 53.5 - 53.9
Stem Length: 9.6 - 10.2
BB-Saddle Position: 76.0 - 78.0
Saddle-Handlebar: 51.7 - 52.3
Saddle Setback: 5.1 - 5.5


The French Fit (cm)
-------------------------------------------
Seat tube range c-c: 56.7 - 57.2
Seat tube range c-t: 58.3 - 58.8
Top tube length: 54.7 - 55.1
Stem Length: 9.8 - 10.4
BB-Saddle Position: 74.3 - 76.3
Saddle-Handlebar: 53.4 - 54.0
Saddle Setback: 4.6 - 5.0


My guess is that it is to small?
Eres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 09:34 AM   #4
mikeybikes
Senior Member
 
mikeybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edgewater, CO
Bikes: Tons
Posts: 3,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wouldn't buy a bike you couldn't try out if you weren't sure it would fit you.
mikeybikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 09:47 AM   #5
Eres
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeshoup View Post
I wouldn't buy a bike you couldn't try out if you weren't sure it would fit you.
hmm.. yes indeed you have a point there.
Eres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 11:46 AM   #6
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Just looking at your measurements my first thought is that the frame is too small. I'm almost your exact height and inseam and I ride a 57 cm Litespeed and can get by with a 55. My 57's have about 11 cm of seatpost exposed and the bars are 3.5 cm below the saddle top but that takes 30 mm of spacers and a +6 up-angled stem to achieve.

Unless you are willing to have a LOT of seatpost exposed, use a long stem and be willing to have the bars several cm below the saddle, the frame is too small.

Two of the "fit" recommendations you cite are intended for competative riders and have a low stretched out riding position. Even then they say the frame is too small. The French fit is more conservative and it says the frame is significantly too small.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 12:23 PM   #7
Eres
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
Just looking at your measurements my first thought is that the frame is too small. I'm almost your exact height and inseam and I ride a 57 cm Litespeed and can get by with a 55. My 57's have about 11 cm of seatpost exposed and the bars are 3.5 cm below the saddle top but that takes 30 mm of spacers and a +6 up-angled stem to achieve.

Unless you are willing to have a LOT of seatpost exposed, use a long stem and be willing to have the bars several cm below the saddle, the frame is too small.
Thanks for your reply.

And I must agree, I now also think that it's to small, and must find something else with a 55 size at least.

May I ask what model and year Litespeed you have? both of them.
Eres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 06:45 PM   #8
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eres View Post
May I ask what model and year Litespeed you have? both of them.
Actually, I have three of them.

The oldest is a '96 55cm Catalyst with 70,000 miles.

The newer ones are both 57 cm, an '05 Firenza and an '06 Tuscany. The Tuscany is all Campy Chorus 10-speed. The Firenza is a mongral with Campy 10-speed Ergo brifters and front derailleur every thing else is Shimano Ultegra 9 and 10-speed stuff. They play well together thanks to a Shiftmate.

I know it sounds odd to have two such similar bikes but I bought the frames when Colorado Cyclist was closing out Litespeed in late '06 and the prices were much to good to pass up.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 08:20 PM   #9
Hasty
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: US
Bikes:
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Get 55 or 56. 53 is too small.
Hasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-10, 09:24 PM   #10
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Too small. You need something about 56 cm c-t.
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-10, 09:11 AM   #11
trek330
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York City
Bikes:
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a 2000 Litespeed Classic that's 55 cm.I'm 5'8 and it fits like a glove.
trek330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-10, 09:24 AM   #12
ArthurIhde
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
hmmm i dont think it is so small
ArthurIhde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-10, 09:35 AM   #13
cyclist2000
Senior Member
 
cyclist2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Bikes: Masi (retired), Giant TCR, Eisentraut, Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo (trainer bike), Cannondale, 84 Stumpjumper, Waterford(N+1), Tern D8 (N+1), looking for a Ti frame
Posts: 3,024
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArthurIhde View Post
hmmm i dont think it is so small
Why is that?
cyclist2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-10, 06:11 AM   #14
Eres
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for all of your replies

I have decided that I will go after a size 55 or 56.
Eres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-10, 10:35 AM   #15
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Pay more attention to the top tube length (or overall cockpit length) than nominal size. TT length varies within a "size" so unless you know what you want and what the bike has, the only alternative is to ride it.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 AM.