Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,450
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What was the inventor thinking

    when he designed this monstrosity?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Cannondale-Proto...item3f045844df
    Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

    1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
    1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
    1988 Ducati 750 F1

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,757
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's actually cool as hell.
    The seller's price point is a little off, but kudos to the inventor for coming up with an entirely new drive system.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,450
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AllenG View Post
    That's actually cool as hell.
    The seller's price point is a little off, but kudos to the inventor for coming up with an entirely new drive system.
    Anything hydraulic is extremely inefficient, think of the inefficiency of an automatic transmission.

    Maybe it's a constantly variable gearing setup? I guess that would be an innovation.
    Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

    1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
    1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
    1988 Ducati 750 F1

  4. #4
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Grid Reference, SK
    My Bikes
    I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
    Posts
    3,769
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    VEry cool.

    Just because we've always done someting a certain way does not me that is the best way to do it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member mvnsnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    WNY
    My Bikes
    old bikes
    Posts
    2,166
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    It's a great proof of concept, but I agree $10 is a bit too much.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
    Posts
    3,591
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the bike has no torque converter,I would be pretty much direct drive.You would have to compress the fluid in order to lose power,that isn't going to happen.

    Looks like there could be vanes in the system though,meaning torque lose or gain,depending.

    Efficiency of fluid drive is real close to chain drive.About 95% for fluid/98% for chain.
    Last edited by Booger1; 10-28-10 at 12:54 PM.
    Everything should be as simple as possible...But not more so.---Albert Einstein

  7. #7
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Grid Reference, SK
    My Bikes
    I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
    Posts
    3,769
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Booger1 View Post
    If the bike has no torque converter,I would be pretty much direct drive.You would have to compress the fluid in order to lose power,that isn't going to happen.

    Looks like there could be vanes in the rear though.

    Efficiency of fluid drive is real close to chain drive.About 95% for fluid/98% for chain.
    There would be loss of power through fluid friction as it passes through the system, and it is possible that there would be further losses if there were vanes or gears where some fluid 'passes,' but still a good attempt!

    I have always wanted to have my pedals driving a generator and the generator powering an electric motor at the rear wheel, but I know it would not be particularly efficient so I have not spent the time trying it.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Chombi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    My Bikes
    1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC (Project)
    Posts
    10,112
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There have been numerous successful experiments with fluid drive systems on the front wheels of motorcycles to come up with two wheel drive on them. Problem has always been added weight and added power requirement.
    IMHO, you will be better off trying to build a modern shaft drive system for a bicycle, specially with the lighter materials now available....Uhmmm......maybe hollow CF shaft and drive housings and light alloy geartrain parts......you might even be able to get rid of most lubrication requirements with the right materials.

    Chombi

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Giant FCR3, Cannondale Synapse Carbon
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting rake on that front fork.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    27,126
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chombi View Post
    There have been numerous successful experiments with fluid drive systems on the front wheels of motorcycles to come up with two wheel drive on them.
    You will notice none of them are in production in any useful numbers

  11. #11
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    8,534
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hard to not lose when efficiency gets compared with a well oiled clean roller chain.

    A good mechanism for a pedal powered drive system, that application to a bicycle a bit kludgy, especially one with the fork backwards.

    but there are lots of other machines that could benefit from a human power source

    a flour mill, a water pump, maybe a pedal powered Forklift?
    but thats 3rd world uses , or maybe this one when the oil goes away.

  12. #12
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,519
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Booger1 View Post
    If the bike has no torque converter,I would be pretty much direct drive.You would have to compress the fluid in order to lose power,that isn't going to happen.

    Looks like there could be vanes in the system though,meaning torque lose or gain,depending.

    Efficiency of fluid drive is real close to chain drive.About 95% for fluid/98% for chain.
    You may want to revisit your numbers. Fluid-drive is efficient on large powerful systems, but on something as small as a bike with the small power-output, you're presented with a lot of drag from the seals.

  13. #13
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    8,534
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yea, makes a big difference Too, if the motor is a few hundred watts at best,
    rather than a few hundred horsepower.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
    Posts
    3,591
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not my numbers.That's industry standard for chain vs fluid drive in general.

    Efficiency has nothing to do with size or input.

    On chain drive,if 10 HP goes in,9.8 HP come out.100 HP goes in,98 comes out.The only difference is the size of the chain. Same with fluids.
    Last edited by Booger1; 10-28-10 at 04:08 PM.
    Everything should be as simple as possible...But not more so.---Albert Einstein

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    el paso,tx
    Posts
    226
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    needs a motor. why pedal a bike that weighs 55lbs

  16. #16
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    8,534
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My point exactly, human powered stationary tools, in a dusty environment,
    like a Grist Mill.

    or an inboard pedaled outboard prop boat motor..
    flexible outboard so banging into bottom won't break so much stuff

    with a bunch of driving pumps and just a couple driven pumps all the partier's
    on the houseboat could change the location of the house party.
    Last edited by fietsbob; 10-29-10 at 11:59 AM.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,516
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LarDasse74 View Post
    VEry cool.

    Just because we've always done someting a certain way does not me that is the best way to do it.
    In the case of bikes what we have now is the best way to do it. 160 years Evolution has brought us today's bike.

  18. #18
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,519
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Booger1 View Post
    Not my numbers.That's industry standard for chain vs fluid drive in general.

    Efficiency has nothing to do with size or input.

    On chain drive,if 10 HP goes in,9.8 HP come out.100 HP goes in,98 comes out.The only difference is the size of the chain. Same with fluids.
    Don't know which industry you're quoting, but everything I find about hydraulics says 85% best-case-scenario:

    http://www.machinerylubrication.com/...pump-condition

    You also have to differentiate between volumetric-efficiency versus mechanical-efficiency. Just because you can get the output-shaft to run at 97.5% of the speed of the input, doesn't mean that 97.5% of the power got there. It's actually much lower than that due to various factors such as viscosity and shear friction.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Chombi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    My Bikes
    1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC (Project)
    Posts
    10,112
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    You will notice none of them are in production in any useful numbers
    Yes, because the technology is still in it's infancy, but the major motorcycle company, Yamaha, had been working on prototypes for a couple of years now and the results have supposedly been good so far I think there is also a small company out there that's already selling a conversion kit for a certain dirtbike already. Two wheel drive isn't new in motorcycles. Rokon had been making two wheel drive bikes since the early 70's with a mechanical drive to the front wheel. The bike they made was more of an expeditionary/utility bike and is more for slogging slowly through the wilderness. If Yamaha does push through with 2 wheel drive bikes, I think the armed services and other government departments (Police, DNR, Homeland Security...etc) will be very interested. the niche is certainly there.

    Chombi

  20. #20
    Don from Austin Texas
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    My Bikes
    Schwinn S25 "department store crap" FS MTB, home-made CF 26" hybrid, CF road bike with straight bar, various wierd frankenbikes
    Posts
    1,178
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by San Rensho View Post
    Man! That's got to be ONE slow bike!

    Don in Austin

  21. #21
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Grid Reference, SK
    My Bikes
    I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
    Posts
    3,769
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by davidad View Post
    In the case of bikes what we have now is the best way to do it. 160 years Evolution has brought us today's bike.
    Perhaps. Perhaps not.

    The only true wisdom is knowing you know nothing.

  22. #22
    Velocommuter Commando Sirrus Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    My Bikes
    '88 Specialized Sirrus, '89 Alpine Monitor Pass, two '70 Raligh Twenties, '07 Schwinn Town & Country Trike, '07 Specialized Sirrus Hybrid
    Posts
    2,613
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Don in Austin View Post
    Man! That's got to be ONE slow bike!

    Don in Austin
    +1 but think of the cardio workout.
    Riding 19 Years of Specialized Sirrus Tradition.
    Live in Houston? Come to http://bicyclecommutehouston.blogspot.com/
    1988 Specialized Sirrus, 1989 Alpine Monitor Pass MTB, 2007 Specialized Sirrus 700C hybrid, 2007 Schwinn Town & Country trike, 1970 "Resto-Improved" Raleigh 20, 1970 "WIP" Raleigh 20, and 1980 "WIP" Schwinn Town & Country trike

  23. #23
    Senior Member dstrong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Awesome, Austin, TX
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix, Interloc Impala, ParkPre Image C6
    Posts
    3,760
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    But..but...but...but....IT'S A CAD!!!!!!

    2014 Specialized RoubaixOOOOOO 2003 Interloc ImpalaOOOOOO 2007 ParkPre Image C6 (RIP)


  24. #24
    Senior Member hotbike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    My Bikes
    a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike
    Posts
    2,728
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually, it's been done before. An inventor built a streamlined recumbent bicycle (Human Powered Vehicle).

    The problem was, it leaked hydraulic fluid all over the Velodrome Track (Polished Wood) , and they made him go out with a mop and clean up the mess he made.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11629987@N02/sets/72157639939606343/

  25. #25
    afraid of whales Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    3,197
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LarDasse74 View Post
    I have always wanted to have my pedals driving a generator and the generator powering an electric motor at the rear wheel, but I know it would not be particularly efficient so I have not spent the time trying it.
    I have a front dyno hub driving a rear electric hub motor both using special magnets I got from an Inca Priest when I was mountain biking in the Andes. I give it a push, the dyno starts driving the wheels and I can accellerate up to 60mph with zero input power.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •