Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Eastern Mass.
    My Bikes
    Torker U-District, Litespeed Blue Ridge
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Substituting a 34 in place of a 36 tooth middle chainring on a MTB

    I'm repairing an ancient Stumpjumper that came with 26/36/46 chainrings up front. The 36 and 46 were worn down to nubs so I ordered replacements that arrived yesterday. While starting work on the bike today, I've discovered that a 34 was shipped instead of the 36 I wanted.

    The rear has 5 cogs in good condition, smallest=14 teeth, largest=28. I'm replacing the chain with a new SRAM PC850, and the front derailleur with a used Shimano 600.

    My options:
    1. Call the LBS Monday and have them reorder the 36. I'll probably get it by Wednesday and I'll finish the bike for next weekend.

    2. Install the 34 and ride tomorrow.

    Is there a good reason to gear a MTB with 26/34/46 chainrings or should I just be patient and exchange the chainring next week?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,601
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I expect the difference will be negligable. You will find the 34 middle ring a bit easier to climb with but otherwise little difference. The overall highest and lowest gears will remain unchanges as the 46 and 26 define them.

    Certainly there is no mechanical problem with the switch.

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Grid Reference, SK
    My Bikes
    I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
    Posts
    3,769
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depends.

    Have you ridden this bike before and if so how did you like the gearing? If you are doing actual off-road riding and there are any hills then a slightly easier gear might be useful. Replacing a 36 with a 34 will not make a bike unridable, but may make it very slightly better or worse.

    One of the main complaints with old mountain bikes was that the stock gearing was too tall for many people. Modern bikes come with 44/32/22 (or thereabouts ) chainrings with 12-32 cassettes. And people seem to like the 32 tooth middle ring. A 34 tooth ring is closer to the modern setup than a 36.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Eastern Mass.
    My Bikes
    Torker U-District, Litespeed Blue Ridge
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got the bike recently with an OK frame and wheels but thrashed drivetrain, so I've never ridden it.

    I'm hoping that the 34 and the 26 aren't too similar as to be redundant. Exchanging the 34 for the 36 isn't a big deal if I don't install and use the 34, but I lose another weekend.

    This bike will be used almost exclusively off-road.
    Last edited by Rail; 11-13-10 at 07:16 PM. Reason: added a line

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Grid Reference, SK
    My Bikes
    I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
    Posts
    3,769
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rail View Post
    This bike will be used almost exclusively off-road.
    Then for sure keep the 34. Maybe even see if you can get a 24 small ring if there are any hills in your area. 26-28 is not a very good low gear for a mountain bike. Most modern mountain bikes have 3 to 5 smaller gear choices than 26-28.

  6. #6
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You won't be able to tell the difference.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Eastern Mass.
    My Bikes
    Torker U-District, Litespeed Blue Ridge
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I installed the 34 and it tests mostly OK. Shifting from the 46 to the 34 is touchy; it seems to be a big drop. I have to do it gently or the chain skips right over and down to the 26. The chain and derailleur are also new to the bike and I'll still tuning.

    Replacing the 26 with a 24 does seem like a good idea now that I've tried riding the bike.

    Gratuitous bike porn follows.

    IMG_1345..JPGIMG_1367..jpgIMG_1368..JPGIMG_1361..JPG

  8. #8
    Senior Member mechBgon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    6,957
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oooo, classic!

  9. #9
    Subjectively Insane MilitantPotato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    My Bikes
    '09 Rodriguez Adventurer Custom, '08 Trek 7.3Fx
    Posts
    804
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice bike ya got there.

    Get a tetanus shot if that chain scratches ya!
    You've got a bike, so you gotta move.

  10. #10
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    682
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    .. replacing chain and freewheel next? hint hint...

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Eastern Mass.
    My Bikes
    Torker U-District, Litespeed Blue Ridge
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Photo #1 is the "before" shot showing the worn chainrings, smashed and rusted derailleur, and wrecked chain.

    The chain is now a new SRAM, and the old freewheel is in OK condition despite the abuse, even if only 5 cogs.

  12. #12
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    682
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thumbnails just go black when I try to open them so I gave up trying..
    so 'good condition' is subjective..

    You would have to know how many miles that worn chain turned that freewheel ,
    or have just taken it out of a NOS box.
    whatever ...


    Nice 5 cog freewheels are offered under the IRD brand these days , adds current shifting profile to the teeth ..

  13. #13
    Senior Member surreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,032
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've never tried the ird freewheels, but i rejected them after reading reviews about the pawls failing...

    i agree that it's wise to replace the freewheel, but it isn't necessary... will prevent accelerated/uneven wear on the new rings/chain, though. and sunrace freewheels are sooooooooooo cheep...why not?

    -rob

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Eastern Mass.
    My Bikes
    Torker U-District, Litespeed Blue Ridge
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is the freewheel that's on the bike right now with the new chain.

    IMG_1374..JPGIMG_1371..JPG

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •