Does anyone know the torque rating of single speed freewheels?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does anyone know the torque rating of single speed freewheels?
Hey.
I'm looking for the forque rating for a single speed freewheel like https://https://www.amazon.com/Dicta-1.../dp/B001F2URGY
I asking about the strenght of freewheels not how much torque to apply when tighten.
Thanks
I'm looking for the forque rating for a single speed freewheel like https://https://www.amazon.com/Dicta-1.../dp/B001F2URGY
I asking about the strenght of freewheels not how much torque to apply when tighten.
Thanks
#2
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1526 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
NFI how to find out, but it's almost certainly more than you need.
Unless you plan to put V8 power through one or something...
I reckon it's safe to say an aluminium hub's threads would strip first.
Unless you plan to put V8 power through one or something...
I reckon it's safe to say an aluminium hub's threads would strip first.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
pssssssssssssst-- here's a secret: thread the freewheel on, and finger-tighten it. Then, go for a ride. Congrats! You've just applied the correct amount of torque.
-rob
-rob
Likes For surreal:
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, I'm asking because I'm looking tor buy a one way roller bearing for a different project.
I was wondering the strength so I could translate it over to the roller bearing and pick out the correct size.
Thanks
I was wondering the strength so I could translate it over to the roller bearing and pick out the correct size.
Thanks
#5
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1526 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Hmm, you could mount an inline scale between some chain wrapped around your chainring and cog, see how much force the chain exerts on the cog, and do some maths...
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: City of Brotherly Love
Posts: 1,562
Bikes: Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why kind of numbers are you dealing with? Or what is the project?
#7
You gonna eat that?
Okay. How much do you weigh? 200 lb.? Maybe a heavy rider is twice that? Apply 400 lb. through your drivetrain, applying the various mechanical advantages (crank arm > chain ring > cog) and that should give you a pretty good idea. I have a 46/18, not sure about the crank length, but let's say it's a 170 mm.
So, force is applied at 170 mm = 6.7 inches
Torque applied about the crank is 6.7 x 400 = 2,680 in-lb (= 223 ft-lb)
With an 46/18 gear ration, the torque at the rear axle is 18/46 x 223 = 87.4 ft-lb.
So the torque applied at the rear axle by a 400 lb. rider putting all his weight on one crank through a 46/18 gear train is 87.4 ft-lb. That gives you a factor of 2 over a 200 lb. rider. If you're looking for a rating for the torque on the freewheel, it's probably somewhere around there, like maybe 100 ft-lb. I suspect the actual rating is a little higher than that.
So, force is applied at 170 mm = 6.7 inches
Torque applied about the crank is 6.7 x 400 = 2,680 in-lb (= 223 ft-lb)
With an 46/18 gear ration, the torque at the rear axle is 18/46 x 223 = 87.4 ft-lb.
So the torque applied at the rear axle by a 400 lb. rider putting all his weight on one crank through a 46/18 gear train is 87.4 ft-lb. That gives you a factor of 2 over a 200 lb. rider. If you're looking for a rating for the torque on the freewheel, it's probably somewhere around there, like maybe 100 ft-lb. I suspect the actual rating is a little higher than that.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,691
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times
in
1,422 Posts
Given that the chains that run on them are typically rated to 1,100kg or so, I'd work out what torque that would produce based on the sprocket radius, (roughly 1.5" on a 15t). The freewheel should be built to withstand the chain's max load, so that would be a starting place. Odds are that they're even stronger than that.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
Gear Hub fan
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,829
Bikes: Civia Hyland Rohloff, Swobo Dixon, Colnago, Univega
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
IMO it will vary sepending on make of freewheel and the quality of materials used. The White Industries freewheels, particularly the special trials version, are probably the strongest as they use 3 or more ratchet arms internally.
The calculation provided by Doohickie is probably the best estimate you will find.
The calculation provided by Doohickie is probably the best estimate you will find.
__________________
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro
Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro
Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,691
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times
in
1,422 Posts
I'd estimate that a range of 250 - 300 ft#s of torque would still be a conservative estimate ot their capacity.
Consider that the mechanism is the same as used on freewheels which use sprockets of 30t or more, driven by grannies. If you use Doohickie's analysis assuming a 24/30 combination you'd see that even my estimate might be conservative.
Obviously quality of construction is a factor, but the basic design is at the top of the scale for torque capacity in the category of over-running clutches.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#11
You gonna eat that?
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Clearlake, CA
Posts: 16
Bikes: 72 of them at last count.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Any progress?
I am also working on a custom project -- a three-person pedal-car with 48-inch tall tires (penny-farthing wheels). The vehicle belongs to a friend and it used to have bicycle wheels, but I lucked into two of the penny-farthing wheels and want to use them to give the vehicle a steam-punky style.
So, I need to install some form of low-friction freewheeling mechanisms in the hubs of the penny-farthing wheels (which are replicas by Rideable Bicycle Replicas in Alameda, Northern California).
And I am looking at one-way bearings such as this:
https://www.vxb.com/CSK25PP-One-way-p/kit10971.htm
This one is good for 68 N.m, which appears to equal 50 pound/feet.
I have build a few large pedal-vehicles for Kinetic Sculpture Racing, but I always incorporated BMX freewheels further upstream in the drivetrain. Trouble with that, is the friction of chains and bearings downstream of the freewheel when the vehicle is coasting.
Yes, I can attach BMX freewheels to the penny-farthing hubs. But this is all about doing something "cool" and "neat". So, I am thinking about these industrial one-way bearings.
In the snapshot below, the new wheels are only loosely mocked up in position.
Thoughts? Facts? Good-natured ridicule?
Thanks!
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I would think freewheels that are used on mid-drive ebikes should give you enough info. You can figure out the motor torque and go from there.
John
John
#14
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1526 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
At a guess, 68Nm seems a bit wimpy... bike drivetrains are unusually low rpm, high torque. But I guess since it's a trike, we're talking 136Nm of capacity? Is there a differential?
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#15
Senior Member
Not sure if this will be useful information for the current project but...
Bicycle freewheels are strong. Real strong. Over the years I have known freakishly strong riders who do pop chains. Who do strip threads off the hub shell. Who twist Campagnolo crankarms. Who shear off pedal spindles. Freewheels are not a problem for those guys. Sure the little pawl springs fracture and they don’t work when lubrication fails. They do hold up to extreme load. Do not expect problems.
Bicycle freewheels are strong. Real strong. Over the years I have known freakishly strong riders who do pop chains. Who do strip threads off the hub shell. Who twist Campagnolo crankarms. Who shear off pedal spindles. Freewheels are not a problem for those guys. Sure the little pawl springs fracture and they don’t work when lubrication fails. They do hold up to extreme load. Do not expect problems.
#16
Full Member
sounds bizarre but I had a trail-a-bike in for repair (with single cog freewheel) where the kid stripped the freewheel threads off the hub.
I'd be looking for a decent hub for the project. Avoid those stamped sheet metal bso hubs. I've seen scores of failed hubs. Freewheel issues are almost always due to lack of any maintenance. Pawls getting stuck 'open' in -30F weather or rusty from being left out doors in the rain and snow.
and don't get a freewheel that has no remover slots. yeap, they make em like that.
For that creation, I don't think high speed is going to be an issue. You may need a 22t freewheel.
I'd be looking for a decent hub for the project. Avoid those stamped sheet metal bso hubs. I've seen scores of failed hubs. Freewheel issues are almost always due to lack of any maintenance. Pawls getting stuck 'open' in -30F weather or rusty from being left out doors in the rain and snow.
and don't get a freewheel that has no remover slots. yeap, they make em like that.
For that creation, I don't think high speed is going to be an issue. You may need a 22t freewheel.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,067
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4197 Post(s)
Liked 3,849 Times
in
2,300 Posts
Roller clutches have been used by the bike business for a long time although any one manufacturer's data might not be public I do remember that some problems with alloy hub shells withstanding the outward force the rollers can exert. Something about hub shells cracking about the clutch's circumference. IIRR one company solved this with a wrapping band of carbon around the clutch portion of the hub shell.
I'll add that roller clutches can have a somewhat different engagement "feel" compared to a ratchet design. Less "hard/solid" with initial engagement. Although for a while the police liked the silent coasting Andy
I'll add that roller clutches can have a somewhat different engagement "feel" compared to a ratchet design. Less "hard/solid" with initial engagement. Although for a while the police liked the silent coasting Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
I would use Doohickie 's strategy for estimating, but I would change the equipment to work out how much abuse would be possible under worst conditions.
I will use a 200kg (440lb, 1960N)) rider putting all their weight on a 185mm crankarm
Lets use a 20t small cog (smallest commonly available chainring)
and the largest available SS freewheel sprocket: 28 teeth was the largest I found in a 2 second search
T = 1960N X 0.185m X 28t/20t = 507Nm
or
T=440lbs X 185mm/305mm/ft X 28t/20t = 374 ft-lbs
I will use a 200kg (440lb, 1960N)) rider putting all their weight on a 185mm crankarm
Lets use a 20t small cog (smallest commonly available chainring)
and the largest available SS freewheel sprocket: 28 teeth was the largest I found in a 2 second search
T = 1960N X 0.185m X 28t/20t = 507Nm
or
T=440lbs X 185mm/305mm/ft X 28t/20t = 374 ft-lbs
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
PS
THat's a big number - the 2.5L engine in my car only puts out 163 ft-lbs, but that's at some 1000s of RPMs.
I weigh about 110 kg (242lbs, 1078 N) and have 180mm cranks, and the low gear on my mtb is 22-32:
T=1078N X 0.18m x 32t/22t = 282 Nm, or about 207ft-lbs. So my Deore freehub body regularly sees a torque of 207 ft-lbs (at ~0 RPM)
THat's a big number - the 2.5L engine in my car only puts out 163 ft-lbs, but that's at some 1000s of RPMs.
I weigh about 110 kg (242lbs, 1078 N) and have 180mm cranks, and the low gear on my mtb is 22-32:
T=1078N X 0.18m x 32t/22t = 282 Nm, or about 207ft-lbs. So my Deore freehub body regularly sees a torque of 207 ft-lbs (at ~0 RPM)
#20
BMX Connoisseur
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 774
Bikes: 1988 Kuwahara Newport, 1983 Nishiki, 1984 Diamond Back Viper, 1991 Dyno Compe
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 108 Times
in
69 Posts
As a BMX'er....
I could be a bit wrong on this. But with BMX in the first Olympics I believe Jason Richardson was peaking at 2,328 watts But I don't know how to work out the torque because I don't know the gear ratio. With the older style BMX freewheels the chain always snaps first. I've taken part vintage Suntour bmx and road bike freewheels and found that the pawls etc were quite similar. In 3rd world countries many have bicycle powered carts and haul huge amounts of weight.
But modern BMX 9t cassettes seem to brake often. The pawls chip or wear out, and the springs seem to break. They tried to go with a 8t and the torque was sheering / breaking the teeth off them. So I can't help but think a 18t is going to be a little stronger then a 16t.
I could be a bit wrong on this. But with BMX in the first Olympics I believe Jason Richardson was peaking at 2,328 watts But I don't know how to work out the torque because I don't know the gear ratio. With the older style BMX freewheels the chain always snaps first. I've taken part vintage Suntour bmx and road bike freewheels and found that the pawls etc were quite similar. In 3rd world countries many have bicycle powered carts and haul huge amounts of weight.
But modern BMX 9t cassettes seem to brake often. The pawls chip or wear out, and the springs seem to break. They tried to go with a 8t and the torque was sheering / breaking the teeth off them. So I can't help but think a 18t is going to be a little stronger then a 16t.
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Clearlake, CA
Posts: 16
Bikes: 72 of them at last count.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Wonderful! I am mighty impressed with all these well-thought-out responses.
Yes, bicycle freewheels is probably the best way for me to go. And yes, they are generally stronger than the chain.
No differential. Instead, two riders will power one of the drive-wheels, and one rider (the strongest of the three, generally) will power the other drive-wheel. No connection between the two drive-trains. This way, no single failure will completely disable the vehicle. Also, individual control of the drive-wheels can be used to help the vehicle make tight turns.
The hub of the penny-farthing wheel is 6 inches wide.
So, I can stack a handful one-way bearings thru that hub. And thanks to the nature of the design, they would all share the load. That is, the roller-sprag-clutch design engages immediately.
Ratcheting bicycle freewheels, on the other hand, have free-play, and they would be synchronized only occasionally by sheer fluke, so only one of them would carry the load at any one time. And I could not easily install more than two per wheel. Still, this may be perfectly adequate.
Total drive ratio is not an issue, since there will be a jackshaft, where I can juggle any number of teeth I want. In fact, there will probably be a freewheel (a spin-on freewheel cluster from a mountain bike) on each jackshaft. What I am trying to avoid is having the jackshafts spinning whenever the road-wheels are moving.
Let me see if I can make a drawing, and maybe take a photo or two.
But yes, you are close to convincing me to forget about the industrial roller clutches.
Yes, bicycle freewheels is probably the best way for me to go. And yes, they are generally stronger than the chain.
No differential. Instead, two riders will power one of the drive-wheels, and one rider (the strongest of the three, generally) will power the other drive-wheel. No connection between the two drive-trains. This way, no single failure will completely disable the vehicle. Also, individual control of the drive-wheels can be used to help the vehicle make tight turns.
The hub of the penny-farthing wheel is 6 inches wide.
So, I can stack a handful one-way bearings thru that hub. And thanks to the nature of the design, they would all share the load. That is, the roller-sprag-clutch design engages immediately.
Ratcheting bicycle freewheels, on the other hand, have free-play, and they would be synchronized only occasionally by sheer fluke, so only one of them would carry the load at any one time. And I could not easily install more than two per wheel. Still, this may be perfectly adequate.
Total drive ratio is not an issue, since there will be a jackshaft, where I can juggle any number of teeth I want. In fact, there will probably be a freewheel (a spin-on freewheel cluster from a mountain bike) on each jackshaft. What I am trying to avoid is having the jackshafts spinning whenever the road-wheels are moving.
Let me see if I can make a drawing, and maybe take a photo or two.
But yes, you are close to convincing me to forget about the industrial roller clutches.