Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member J Jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    North Jersey
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Super Six
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Proper Bike Frame Size

    I am 5'11.5" with a 33" inseam. I would classify myself as having longer arms and being very flexible in my hips, hamstrings, and lower back.

    Currently I am riding a 2007 58cm Trek 1000 as my winter "beater bike" and raced last season on a 2010 57cm Fisher Rail Super. I have been fit on both bikes and do not feel aero or aggressive, I feel crunched and unable to really flex and open up.

    At my lbs today, I tested a 60cm 2010 Madone 5.2. The salesman was very hesitant to put me on it bc he felt it would be to big, without even giving it a chance. I explained I have been riding a 58 cm for some time and feel crunched. After riding it in the lot, he mentioned my stroke looked good on the 60 but that I looked to be reaching a bit, which I did not feel as I felt comfortable. My plan would be to put a shorter stem on the front and possible a shorter seat stem. However, after a quick spin in the lot I did not feel the 60 frame felt much bigger than my 58 frame. My thinking is that, perhaps, the 2010 madone frame is running a tad small... anyone heard this?

    I am going back to the shop tomorrow for a fitting. Does anyone have any advice for me? Does it sound like I need a 58 frame or could I possibly go to the 60? What would be the pro's and/or con's of going to the larger frame? Again I felt comfortable on it, as I felt like I could open up and stretch. My thought would be to put a shorter stem on the handlebars and bring them a bit closer and get aggressive.

    Am I way off? Thanks for any help!

  2. #2
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by J Jake View Post
    I am 5'11.5" with a 33" inseam. I would classify myself as having longer arms and being very flexible in my hips, hamstrings, and lower back.

    Currently I am riding a 2007 58cm Trek 1000 as my winter "beater bike" and raced last season on a 2010 57cm Fisher Rail Super. I have been fit on both bikes and do not feel aero or aggressive, I feel crunched and unable to really flex and open up.

    At my lbs today, I tested a 60cm 2010 Madone 5.2. The salesman was very hesitant to put me on it bc he felt it would be to big, without even giving it a chance. I explained I have been riding a 58 cm for some time and feel crunched. After riding it in the lot, he mentioned my stroke looked good on the 60 but that I looked to be reaching a bit, which I did not feel as I felt comfortable. My plan would be to put a shorter stem on the front and possible a shorter seat stem. However, after a quick spin in the lot I did not feel the 60 frame felt much bigger than my 58 frame. My thinking is that, perhaps, the 2010 madone frame is running a tad small... anyone heard this?

    I am going back to the shop tomorrow for a fitting. Does anyone have any advice for me? Does it sound like I need a 58 frame or could I possibly go to the 60? What would be the pro's and/or con's of going to the larger frame? Again I felt comfortable on it, as I felt like I could open up and stretch. My thought would be to put a shorter stem on the handlebars and bring them a bit closer and get aggressive.

    Am I way off? Thanks for any help!
    There's no point polling for random guesses on the internet.

    A real fit in the real world will be the final say, which you are going to do. Modern sizing, if between sizes is to go smaller and use a longer stem if you're flexible and/or racing. Shorter stem with a slightly larger frame... meh.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  3. #3
    I'm Carbon Curious 531phile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earthquake Central
    My Bikes
    Enough
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you tried putting a longer stem on your current bike, maybe one with a bit of rise and flip it upside down for a more aero position? I'd do this before buying another bike. Another 10 or 20mm could be what you need. If it doesn't work, then go look at that Wreck. And see if you can take that Wreck on a longer ride than just a parking lot, maybe 10 miles. Taking a spin around the parking lot doesn't really tell you too much about how a bike REALLY feels.
    Last edited by 531phile; 01-10-11 at 09:49 PM.

    Quote Originally Posted by avner View Post
    I loled. Twice. Then I cried. Then I rubbed one out and cried again, but thanks for sharing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    City of Brotherly Love
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
    Posts
    1,067
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've heard that the Trek 58cm frames used to have a slightly different geometry than the other sizes because the 58cm frames were designed for Lance. That way Trek could design the frames for him and still conform to the UCI regulations.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,199
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What matters for fit is the relative positions between the "contact points"; the crank, saddle, and bars. Assuming a frame isn't way off, these can be set by proper selection of components and adjustment. Usually, the choice is between stems and steerer spacers. Sometimes, you may need to select a seatpost with more or less setback.

    I see no reason why your 58 Trek couldn't be made to fit correctly and as desired with proper selection and adjustment of components. I think what you'll find if you look around on the web is that large majority of pro riders tend to use smaller rather than larger frames and extended the seatpost and install a long low stem to achieve the desired fit and riding position.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,199
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bezalel View Post
    I've heard that the Trek 58cm frames used to have a slightly different geometry than the other sizes because the 58cm frames were designed for Lance. That way Trek could design the frames for him and still conform to the UCI regulations.
    Huh?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    My Bikes
    Two LOOK 585s, one KG461
    Posts
    4,987
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's very easy to predict the difference in the fit, if you post the geometry and the setup of your old bike - including the amount of spacers, stem length and angle and the type of seatpost used.

    The first thing I look at is the total stack height at the head tube - that's measured from the base of the head tube (or headset if the fram uses a conventional press fit headset), to the top of the spacer stack under the stem.

    If the 33 inches is a cycling inseam, then the 58 and 60cm sizes would both be too large. A 33 inch (84cm) cycling inseam would only mean a saddle height of about 74cm and it would also mean that you have short legs for your height. If that's a pant's inseam, it's worthless information, but it would suggest a much greater cycling inseam.

  8. #8
    Senior Member oldbobcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boulder County, CO
    My Bikes
    '79 Gios, '80 Masi, '06 Felt, early '60s Frejus
    Posts
    2,455
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even if you can straddle the 60, it's going to be too long and the stem will be too high. Wait for a 58.

    I'm 5'11" and a half, too, but with 35" inseam, long arms, and I ride with a very flat back, and my size on a Madone is 58 with a lot of seatpost showing and a 12 cm stem.

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Grid Reference, SK
    My Bikes
    I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
    Posts
    3,769
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't worry about what 'size' the bike is... if it is comfortable and you don't bag yourself on the top tube then it will work. All the fitting calculations and experts in the world can only get a 'ballpark' fit - it is up to you to experiment with minute adjustments to make yourself comfortable.

    If I were you I would experiment with different stem lengths and rises with your current bike until you find one that feels perfect, then when you buy a new bike, have it set up to match the old one.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,984
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Looigi View Post
    Huh?
    conspiracy theory.

  11. #11
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    40,203
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cannot see you and how you fit on the bike, from this text.

    do you want that ride in a pack at 30 mph all day, low bars high saddle riding posture, .. for racing?

    or should you even look at a top of the range racing bike for your riding needs

    Given how many bikes Trek sold using their putting Lance

    on their bikes at the highest profile part of his racing , the [Tax Deductable?]

    part of their frame design development, for him, paid for itself.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •