Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-11, 07:28 PM   #1
thefsb
Tom
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Spoke lengths for paired hole hubs

Can anyone help me figure spoke lengths if I'm building wheels using Novatec A271SB and F372SB?

Hub specs and photos can be found in the 2011 catalog

There's some good pictures of the lacing I'd use here.

First, the paired holes require some adjustment to the "cross number" used in the various spoke length calculators. But how much? Spocalc.xls says to increase the cross numbers relative to a normal wheel, e.g. for a 20 hole wheel w/ 2x lacing use 2.29 cross. That makes sense if the two spokes on one flange "tab" do not cross (like the front wheel in the example pictures above) but not if they do (like the rear wheel). How do I calculate the cross number adjustments?

Second, the flange cutouts are offset from each other left-to-right. How does this affect spoke length?

Any guidance would be most welcome.
thefsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-11, 10:31 AM   #2
thefsb
Tom
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Am I asking in the wrong place? Is there a better forum for this question?
thefsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-11, 10:38 AM   #3
FunkyStickman
On a Mission from God
 
FunkyStickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Bikes: '10 Surly LHT, Rat-rod Klunker, '82 Peugeot PH12 (WIP)
Posts: 2,009
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Well, Spocalc does paired spoke calculations based on the assumption that the hub's spoke holes are evenly spaced. What you need to do is figure out how many degrees apart the spoke holes are. Spocalc says this:

Note:If paired hub spoke holes are 15 degrees apart, then: For 24 paired spokes laced 2x, enter 2.25 cross. For 24 paired spokes laced 1x, enter 1.25 cross. For 20 paired spokes laced 2x, enter 2.29 cross. For 20 paired spokes laced 1x, enter 1.29 cross. For 16 paired spokes laced 1x, enter 1.33 cross.

So, based on this, run the numbers again and see what you get.

(EDIT) Checked your post again, and I think what you're asking is how to figure if it's 1x or 2x lacing? You only count spokes crossing on the same side of the wheel.

Last edited by FunkyStickman; 04-08-11 at 10:42 AM.
FunkyStickman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-11, 01:16 PM   #4
thefsb
Tom
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi FunkyStickman, thanks for the reply.

My reply ended up being rather long so I turned it into a story.


I had been using three spoke length calculators: Spocalc.xls, DTSwiss and Edd.

The DTSwiss and Edd calculators allow you to use fractional cross numbers but offer no guidance on how. Spocalc says: "Note:If paired hub spoke holes are 15 degrees apart, then: For 24 paired spokes laced 2x, enter 2.25 cross. For 24 paired spokes laced 1x, enter 1.25 cross. For 20 paired spokes laced 2x, enter 2.29 cross. For 20 paired spokes laced 1x, enter 1.29 cross. For 16 paired spokes laced 1x, enter 1.33 cross." But I didn’t understand where those numbers came from or what the resulting lacing pattern would look like.

So I wrote a computer program to help me visualize the designs and understand. I learned a few things.

First, the angular offset of a pair of spoke holes on the left flange relative to the nearest pair on the right flange is determined only by spoke count N. It is independent of the angle between a pair of holes on the hub. A pair of holes on one side at 2π/N relative to the nearest pair on the other side.

Second, it turns out that Spocalc assumes, when it recommends fractional values of cross number X, that the two spokes in a pair of adjacent holes (on one side of the hub) do not cross each other. In other words, the two spokes are pulling on the flange material between the pair of spoke holes. This is why spocalc’s X for a paired-spoke-hole hub is larger than for a regular hub.

Let’s try to visualize this.

Start with X=1 for a regular one-cross lacing with uniform hole spacing.



Here we have a 20-spoke wheel with a small ERD and large hub PCD to help make the images clearer. Hub spoke holes on the front side, as we look at it, are black—on the rear they are green. Front leading spokes are orange, front trailing are red, rear leading are cyan and rear trailing are green.

Now get rid of the rear spokes and spoke holes for clarity.



Next, increase X to 1 < X < 1.5. The diagram shows X = 1.3.



It’s still a one-cross lacing but now the hub has paired holes, meaning that each J end of one spoke is closer to the J end of one neighbor than its other. But these “paired” spokes don’t cross.

Increase X again to 1.5 < X < 2 and now you have a two-spoke lacing—the two paired spokes cross each other. The diagram has X = 1.7.



These last two pictures are of the same hub. Spocalc is offering only the first lacing but I don’t see anything wrong with the second.

If you increase again to X = 2 then the pair move apart so that each hole is equally distant to both of its neighbors and you're back to a regular hub.

The third lesson is how X relates to the angle θ between a pair of spoke holes. θ = 4π/N when X is an integer. θ = 0 when X = 1/2 + an integer, e.g. X = 3/2, which is an impossible hub in practice. In general θ = 8π/N⋅abs(1/2 - frac(X)), which allows me to calculate X given measurements from the hub.

Now put the rear side spokes and spoke holes back in the picture.



And here's the actual front wheel I'm considering with two-cross lacing, 38 mm hub PCD and 521 mm ERD.


Last edited by thefsb; 04-11-11 at 01:17 PM. Reason: url typos
thefsb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM.