Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Planning on Replacing Cassette and Chain

    Hi

    I have posted this on another forum (just before I went to work today) came back to realise it wasn't very active so... I'm pasting it here (in this happening place):

    I am a bit of a tourer, and I am the proud owner of a classical touring dawes galaxy. I've had this bicycle for a number of years, and have noticed the cassette and chain skipping. I'm in the process of replacing them both, as I had planned since the day I bought the bicycle.

    I am surprised with the low range of my cassette (for touring) and I just really need to know whether my 12-24 cassette can be replaced 'simply' with say a 12-28, I have an old basic Shimano RSX 8 speed system; or would this be a problem with the derailleur?
    I am on the verge of buying a cassette and chain at the moment, and of-course do not want to buy the wrong one. I understand I would later also need to work out the appropriate length of chain in accordance to the new sized cassette.

    Am I going to be fine?

    Ben.

    P.S. My chainset range is 30 - 42 - 52. And never do I use the 52 sprocket; It might be worth changing this I assume?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Old Hammer Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Utah
    My Bikes
    Trek, Cannondale Tandem, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,082
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bejee,

    Typical touring gearing is similar to that found on many mountain bikes. On my Surley LHT I have an 11/32 cassette, and (can't say absolutely for sure) something like 46/38/26 on chainrings (Sugino 600). I dragged 75 Lbs of bike, trailer and gear across American without any issues. It worked great. You'll probably need a new, long body RD (mine's an older style XT) and it will probably be easier to just replace the crank, chain and possibly the BB. If you do change the crank assembly, you may also need to change the FD to match the circumferance of the large ring. You should be able to do all of this for between $125-200. This will give you a great touring set-up.
    Last edited by Old Hammer Boy; 05-10-11 at 08:15 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Pearland, Texas
    My Bikes
    Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana
    Posts
    5,474
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ben, How hilly is it where you ride? You can start with a new lower geared cassette and chain and if needed move on to the crankset. Since you don't use the 52T that'll probably be sooner than later and if it's not too hilly you can use a 28-38-48, hilly and a 22-32-44(ish), but swapping the crankset may involve only the crankset or also the bottom bracket and front derailleur.

    Brad

  4. #4
    Fred-ish rogerstg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by beejee View Post
    ...I just really need to know whether my 12-24 cassette can be replaced 'simply' with say a 12-28, I have an old basic Shimano RSX 8 speed system; or would this be a problem with the derailleur?
    Probably, but there is a slim chance that the RD will need to be changed as well, though I doubt it.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the fast reply's.

    It gets pretty hilly around here at times. So I'm thinking changing the crank set is a good idea. And while I'm at that, I will change the Ball Bearings, another 'first' for me.
    But first I will sort the cassette, and fingers crossed my rear derailleur will work fine (although I'll do some Internet research first - see what I can find)

    OK with a little searching I found this:
    http://www.sprockets.uk.com/deraille...ed-p-9323.html
    I believe that would be the same as mine, and I think it is saying the maximum it can deal with is a 28T and minimum is 11T, but I am not sure what it means with the front chain-ring difference of 20T?

  6. #6
    2 Fat 2 Furious contango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    England
    My Bikes
    2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
    Posts
    3,987
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd reckon (although without 100% certainty) that it's looking at the maximum toothcount difference between the front chain rings. If you've got a 52-42-30 setup then moving from the 52 to the 30 means 22 teeth of difference, which might leave your RD struggling to take up the slack in the chain. For a couple of links it's the kind of thing you might get away with - from my (limited) understanding it seems like the kind of thing which would only cause you problems if you used the small chainring and the smallest sprockets, which you shouldn't do anyway.

    If you never use the 52 it might be worth swapping out the chainrings to reduce the gearing so you'd have three chainrings that you actually use.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,969
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can change the 30 small ring to a 24. If you have a long cage der. you should be ok with a 12-28, a 13-28 would be better.
    You could also switch the front rings to a 48-39-24. The 13 rear and 48 front would give you a 100 inch top gear.

    You can use this site to figure out what you need. http://www.jbarrm.com/cycal/cycal.html

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Taking Contango's & Davidad's suggestion a little further - 22/32/42, with a big ring the same size as your your current middle one, is a common MTB setup. That would extend your gear range down by 36%, compared to 17% for the cassette change you're considering. You'd still have a 91-inch top - the current top gear on your middle ring, which as you've found is plenty for many people. And you'd be free to change the cassette as well later on, if you decided you wanted to go lower still.
    Last edited by Antifriction; 05-11-11 at 11:28 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •