Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-11, 09:35 AM   #1
Bostic
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Question on 5703 triple front derailleur

On my Tarmac I'm running Ultegra triple except for a FSA SL-K carbon crankset. It shifts fine with the stock 52/39/30. I'd like to run this particular bike with 53/42/32 but the 6703 front does not like the 42t middle which I presume is by design since it's rated for a 13t spread between middle and outer. I was not able to get acceptable performance based on the inner cage design so I went back to the stock rings.

The 5703 105 series is rated for 11t since it's triple is 50/39/30. Before I buy one I'm assuming 11 teeth is 11 teeth whether it's 53/42 or 50/39?

I already have the FSA chainrings to swap out, the 42t and 53t are ramped and pinned and I managed to locate the hard to find 32t 74mm ring. I ran the 53/42/32 setup on a Campy equipped bike for a few years and like that ratio of gearing. I'm hoping I can get the same thing with the Ultegra shifters since they perform so much better on upshifting between rings.
Bostic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-11, 07:30 AM   #2
Chris_W
Gear Combo Guru
 
Chris_W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Switzerland
Bikes: Spec' Tarmac (road), Ridley Fenix (commuter & fast tourer), Salsa Mamasita (MTB), CoMo Speedster (tandem), Surly Big Dummy (cargo), Airnimal (folder)
Posts: 2,241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Correct, the 5703 front derailleur should shift well for a triple with 53-42-xx rings. 11 teeth is 11 teeth as long as you're in the ballpark of the intended size of the large ring (i.e., about +/- 10% or 45-55 teeth).
Chris_W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-11, 10:59 AM   #3
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If it shifts well now I would leave the chainrings alone.
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 AM.