Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-11, 06:59 AM   #1
Lexi01
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Lexi01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Potentially dumb question about tube size

I have 700x28 tyres and I went to buy some tubes and the size options were:

700x18-28 or
700x28-42

So my tyres are 28...which tubes do I get (and does it matter). Does my weight play a factor? (I'm 225)...

Thanks.
Lexi01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-11, 08:00 AM   #2
blamp28
Bikaholic
 
blamp28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western, Michigan
Bikes: Trek Fuel 90, Giant OCR, Rans Screamer Tandem
Posts: 1,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both would fit. Smaller might be easier changing but really doesn't matter much. I'm 245 and use the 18-28 - have for years.
blamp28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-11, 10:14 AM   #3
BloomBikeShop
BloomBikeShop.com
 
BloomBikeShop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Coast
Bikes: A few.
Posts: 475
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I like my tubes on the smaller side, so given the choice, get 700x18-28.
BloomBikeShop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-11, 01:14 PM   #4
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Smaller one is the better choice. The larger size is more likely to get caught under the tire bead. The larger size would add unnecessary weight at the worst possible place on the bike.
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-11, 06:07 PM   #5
lverhagen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sesame Street
Bikes: Swobo Folsom, Diamond Back Master TG, Mongoose Alta, Huffy Daisy Tandem
Posts: 270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Definitely shoot for the smaller size, tubes stretch out fairly easily, but they do not stretch in. If the 28-42 tube was manufactured poorly, you will likely encounter folds in the tube which can lead to lumps in the tire and poor bead seating. Good Luck!

Cheers
lverhagen
lverhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-11, 09:27 PM   #6
JanMM
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In Central IN
Bikes: RANS V3, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Posts: 13,530
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
I vote for the smaller of the two sizes, too.
__________________
RANS V3 - Ti, RANS V-Rex - cromo, RANS Screamer - cromo
JanMM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-11, 11:03 PM   #7
JiveTurkey
Low car diet
 
JiveTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
Posts: 2,407
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Smaller. I'm running 20-26 tubes in my 28 tires myself. The 28-32 tubes were a pain to try to get in.
JiveTurkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 PM.