Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,189
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Campy Crank Experts I Need Some Help

    As age sets in I'm finding my 30/42/52 triple to be increasingly more useless. I virtually never use the big ring. OTH, another bike has a Shimano 7 sp with 28/38/48. No problems with a 48 or 46T big ring. Seeing as Campy doesn't make that combo, what non-Campy crank will work my 10 sp set up? I'm not interested in a CT crank for that particular bike.

    Ribble Bike has a Stronglight 110 BCD with the right gearing that supposedly is 10 sp compatible. I don't see a lot of Stronglight cranks stateside though.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  2. #2
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    39,855
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you have a 'Race Triple' the granny gear is a 74 BCD, so a 24t chainring is compatible , physically. think about a 26T cog?, 42-16t
    campag gave up on the MTB sector in The 80's...

    I have a 135-74 'Race triple', it has a 50/40 24t combo which seems fine.

    I just run Freewheel hubs, on those, [got off the 'band wagon' at 7 speeds],
    so my high gear cog is a 13T

    BS RB1, 13 -28 f/w Rally RD, Newer Race triple 50/40/24 campag Triomphe 'Liesure' FD
    old campag friction Bar end shifters
    Last edited by fietsbob; 09-18-11 at 10:34 AM.

  3. #3
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    25,930
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    You should find that any modern triple is 10 speed compatible... you could throw a touring triple on there and get a lower range than the 30-42 -52 offers and with a 110 bcd triple crank you get that 74 bcd inner that will run a 24 tooth ring.

    Some older cranks might have a little too much spacing between the chain rings for the narrower 10 speed chain but in some cases the spacers can be changed if there are shifting issues.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    My Bikes
    Two LOOK 585s, one KG461
    Posts
    4,987
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I never like Campy's chainring offerings, so I always used FSA triple with my Campy drivetrain. One issue with other brands can be the difference in the chainline. If your seat tube is 32mm or larger, the chainline needs to be in the 46.5-47.5mm range. I got by with FSA's 46mm, but I had to squeeze the FD cage a bit narrower to use the 5.9mm 10 speed chain. The problem than can occur is the FD lever arm can come to rest on the seat tube and still not drop the chain onto the little ring.

    It's a common misconception the the tooth spacing is significantly different on 9, 10 or 11 speed cranks, but in reality there is little difference. What is usually different is the amount of shifting ramp material on the rings.

  5. #5
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,189
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveSSS View Post
    I never like Campy's chainring offerings, so I always used FSA triple with my Campy drivetrain. One issue with other brands can be the difference in the chainline. If your seat tube is 32mm or larger, the chainline needs to be in the 46.5-47.5mm range. I got by with FSA's 46mm, but I had to squeeze the FD cage a bit narrower to use the 5.9mm 10 speed chain. The problem than can occur is the FD lever arm can come to rest on the seat tube and still not drop the chain onto the little ring.

    It's a common misconception the the tooth spacing is significantly different on 9, 10 or 11 speed cranks, but in reality there is little difference. What is usually different is the amount of shifting ramp material on the rings.
    Very interesting thanks for the info. I'm going to use it on a 28.6mm seat tube. Would that still hold true?
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Homebrew01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ffld Cnty Connecticut
    My Bikes
    Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
    Posts
    15,457
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Maybe a bit off topic, but I have a Campy 10 speed drivetrain on one bike, except for a "5-speed" crankset from 1984. No shifting problems at all.
    Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    My Bikes
    Two LOOK 585s, one KG461
    Posts
    4,987
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
    Very interesting thanks for the info. I'm going to use it on a 28.6mm seat tube. Would that still hold true?
    The narrower chainline shouldn't be a problem with the smaller diameter seat tube.

  8. #8
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,189
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveSSS View Post
    The narrower chainline shouldn't be a problem with the smaller diameter seat tube.
    I would imagine with Campy using friction shifting for the front derailleur it shouldn't be too much of a problem. I've been known to be wrong though. At least that's what the wife says.

    Right now the bike in question has Campy barcon shifters.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    748
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whats more important than whether it is 10speed compatible is whether it is compatible with your bottom bracket.

    What crankset are you running right now?
    What bottom bracket are you using right now? (spindle lenght?)

    If it is a square taper bottom bracket then you should be looking for an aftermarket crankset that is intended for a bottom bracket with ISO tapers.

    The JIS taper looks very similar but has a different taper angle and although some have gotten them to work well they are not 100% interchangable and you can run into problems with the install and having them staying torqued to spec if you mix the two standards.

    -j

  10. #10
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,189
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenfieldja View Post
    Whats more important than whether it is 10speed compatible is whether it is compatible with your bottom bracket.

    What crankset are you running right now?
    What bottom bracket are you using right now? (spindle lenght?)

    If it is a square taper bottom bracket then you should be looking for an aftermarket crankset that is intended for a bottom bracket with ISO tapers.

    The JIS taper looks very similar but has a different taper angle and although some have gotten them to work well they are not 100% interchangable and you can run into problems with the install and having them staying torqued to spec if you mix the two standards.

    -j
    I know I'll probably have change BB's. It's a Veloce triple with the 115mm BB.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  11. #11
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,189
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Has anyone ever used one of the Athena 11 sp cranks in AL?
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •