Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Fork width

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fork width

    Hi folks, I'd appreciate a word of advice about fork width. I've a Reynolds 653 frame - (about 1991) and forks. Chainstay width 125mm, which seems to be a standard but my front forks are, equally, 125mm in-between the two forks. I've been told this isn't standard for forks. I've checked the forks there are no cracks or stretch marks to show they've been adapted, so I was just wondering what folk thought. Is it just the obvious striking me in the face: all bikes are different; or is there a standard size that these are not. I'd appreciate guidance as I don't want to 'fork-out' on stuff for the frame if it's gonna be difficult to buy the basics that fit. Many thanks. Gerald

  2. #2
    Senior Member bikeman715's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Salinas , Ca.
    My Bikes
    Bike Nashbar AL-1 ,Raligh M50 , Schwinn Traveler , and others
    Posts
    2,069
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the standard width for fork is 100 MM . if it dept. store bike then it 86 MM. are you sure the dropouts (the end of the fork ) are not bent?
    bikeman715

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sesame Street
    My Bikes
    Swobo Folsom, Diamond Back Master TG, Mongoose Alta, Huffy Daisy Tandem
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What others have told you, that 125mm isn't a standard spacing for front forks, is correct. Standard spacing is 100mm for the vast majority of bikes, exceptions being older and low end bikes which had spacing around 90-95mm and what are termed "big-hit" bikes, some of which having 110mm spaced thru-axle front hubs. Of course, there are also a few bikes like the Surly Pugsley and those by Jeff Jones that use a 135mm hub in the front.

    With that said, since your frame is steel (and decent steel at that) I would consider taking it to your LBS to have the fork blades cold set to the standard dimension. With that relatively simple modification, installation of widely available parts will be possible. Good luck!

    Cheers
    lverhagen
    Rex Kramer: Striker, listen, and you listen close: flying a plane is no different than riding a bicycle, just a lot harder to put baseball cards in the spokes.

    - Airplane!

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil_gretz View Post
    I don't know about style, because I live in the suburbs.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The drop outs don't look bent, as I mentioned it all looks intact and fine. Maybe the chap who had it originally widened the forks for some reason - don't know. I may well have them reset, need to see if I can track any wheels down to fit it as it currently is. Many thanks for the advice.

  5. #5
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    2,432
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You could play with front axle length, but I'd ascertain if its in alignment. at all ..

    blades equidistant from the center line, and neither blade ahead of the other,
    perpendicular to, CL. and relative to the fork crown.
    Bike shops have a reference jig.

    A rear for single speeds , 120 was 5 speed ,126 for 6-7 speed , 130 for road everything since.
    ditto , symmetrical to the centre line.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •