Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Crystal River and Hernando, Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2015 Cannondale Supersix EVO
    Posts
    13,896
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Are new carbon fiber forks better than they were 10 years ago?

    I'm trying to decide if a new CF fork will give me a more comfortable ride. I'm now 66 years old and comfort is very important.
    My fork is 10 years old. It's the stock CF fork that Litespeed put on the 2001 Tuscany.
    I know carbon bikes have improved and are more comfortable but am wondering if forks have also been improved.
    Here's the fork I have.
    fork.jpg
    Last edited by RonH; 10-15-11 at 09:28 AM.
    My bikes: 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---2015 Cannondale Supersix EVO carbon

    I thought of that while riding my bicycle -- Albert Einstein

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,176
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a Kestral EMS Pro carbon fork (Cr-Mo steerer, carbon everything else, about 490 grams) purchased in 2001 on one bike and Easton EC90-SLX forks (all-carbon, about 295 grams) on twoother bikes dating from 2006. Frankly, I can't tell any difference in comfort due to the two types of forks, or even compared to an all steel fork on another bike.

    I think this business of carbon forks being inherently more "comfortable" than other types is more marketing hype than reality. Comfort comes from larger tires at lower pressure, not fork material.

    BTW, I'm 69 so I have the same age perspective you have.

  3. #3
    Member 76Crescent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    My Bikes
    Too many!
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm with HillRider. I don't think the fork is going to change much as far as comfort goes. They might actually be stiffer, and result in a harsher ride. I wouldn't go drop big bucks on a new fork if comfort is your concern, but if weight is it might be worth it.

  4. #4
    Happy go lucky trevor_ash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Illinois
    My Bikes
    2010 Nagasawa (Track), EAI Bareknuckle (Track), Custom Jonny Cycles (Track), 90's Eddy Merckx (Road), 2002 Colnago Tecnos, 200? Felt F60 (Road), 1992 Schwinn Paramount Series 3 (Road)
    Posts
    286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 76Crescent View Post
    I'm with HillRider.
    Same here, but half his age Much bike stuff is marketing mumbo-jumbo to get your money. If there's nothing wrong with your fork that you're aware of, live happily.

  5. #5
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    544
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What would affect the comfort of a bike beside a good fit: lower air pressure, for most riders 90-100 lbs is fine; wider tires, 25 or 28, and if you are over 200 lbs I recommend 25 or at least on the rear tire as that carries 65% of the weight; a tall head tube; a longer wheelbase, and regarding a fork, going to a fork with a longer rake "more angled". Another idea is replace the seatpost with a shock absorbing seat post, and replace the handlebar tape with a more cushioned tape, more cushioned gloves also.

  6. #6
    Constant tinkerer FastJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,121
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    I think this business of carbon forks being inherently more "comfortable" than other types is more marketing hype than reality. Comfort comes from larger tires at lower pressure, not fork material.
    +1

    Tire width and pressure have more effect than just about anything else. Some say aluminum frames are harsh, CF frames are more comfortable, etc. It really comes down to the tires. Many run at pressures higher than necessary, reading the side of the tire and just filling it up to the maximum. Somewhere there's a really good chart for pressure depending on your weight. Maybe someone else can link it.

    I agree that the type of saddle and bar tape can also have a large part in comfort. The fork? Not so much.
    Why "derailer" is the correct way to spell the gear-change mechanism: sheldonbrown.com/derailer.html

  7. #7
    bike whisperer Kimmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    My Bikes
    copy/paste links: http://velospace.org/node/36949 http://velospace.org/node/47746 http://velospace.org/node/47747
    Posts
    6,842
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FastJake View Post
    Some say aluminum frames are harsh, CF frames are more comfortable, etc. It really comes down to the tires.
    Tyres are obviously the biggest factor, but to rule out other factors is malarkey. Frame design (including material) matters, as does wheel choice.

    I'm not sure to what extent a fork can affect the ride, but I can testify to noticeable effects from changing frames and wheels... and spoke tension.

    But as for what material the frame or fork is, that isn't a reliable indicator of ride quality cause it's the design (given a certain material) that matters. It's a case of suck it and see. It might even be worthwhile to pay a slight amount of heed to marketing bumf.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •