Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    hand built rear wheel, dt swiss rim question

    I'm getting a rear wheel built with a power tap and I can't decide on what rim to go with. My options are dt swiss 415 or dt swiss 465. I could go with either a 28 or 32 hole configuration on the 465 or 28 hole on the 415. This rear wheel would be my EVERYTHING WHEEL, day in and day out training wheel but also my race wheel. I would love to save some weight on these wheels(heavy already due to the pt) and go with the 415s but I am concerned about the rims strength and durability. I'm currently riding handbuilt hed Belgiums 24f/28r 2 cross and have no issues with deflection or durability. Also I weigh 155-165lbs (getting nice a fat in the off season). I know the 465s are a rock solid rim but I would like a little more info on the 415s.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    boston, ma
    Posts
    2,817
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    offset spoke bed rim

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1
    Posts
    8,849
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The only difference seems to be single versus double eyelets. At your weight, I wouldn't be concerned at all with a 28 spoke, single eyelet rim for your do-it-all wheel. I'm in the same ballpark and commute on a 32 hole, single eyelet IRD Cadence VSR rim'd rear wheel. The Cadence rim is a 390 gm rim which is about as light as it gets for a single eyelet rim. I do have the benefit of the offset spoke bed evening out tension but I also carry an extra 5-15 lbs. over my rear wheel on my rack every day. I would recommend using a heavier spoke gauge on the drive side and lighter on the non-drive side to avoid overly slack non-drive side spokes during heavy use. I went with DT Competition drive side and DT Revolution non-drive side but you could go a little heavier with Champion drive, Comp non-drive.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    9,119
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ran DT RR 1.1 rims (predecessor to the 415) on my primary bike for 7 years before finding some small cracks near the spoke holes on the rear wheel. The 415 is good light weight double wall single eyelet rim. The eyelets are in the outer wall and the nipples tighten against the eyelets. The eyelets help distribute stresses over a larger part of the rim. Some of the roads I ride are really rough so I decided to replace the rear rim with a 465 with double walls and double eyelets. In this rim each eyelet is fixed to the inner and outer walls so that the stresses are shared by both walls. It should be a much stronger structure. The numbers are the actual weight of the rims in grams and after rebuilding the wheel with the 465 it did weigh 50 grams more.

    My rear wheel has 32 spokes 3X, and the front has 28 spokes 3X (should have been 2X). The front wheel is now 8 years old and I have not found any cracks. I recommend the 465 for your rear wheel. You could keep the weight down with Competition 2.0 - 1.8 - 2.0 spokes on the drive side and Revolution 2.0 - 1.5 - 2.0 on the non drive side with aluminum alloy nipples.

    edit: Had not seen joejack951's post above before writing mine.

  5. #5
    bike whisperer Kimmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    My Bikes
    copy/paste links: http://velospace.org/node/36949 http://velospace.org/node/47746 http://velospace.org/node/47747
    Posts
    6,828
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by reptilezs View Post
    offset spoke bed rim
    This. It's a free lunch of extra strength for no weight penalty.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1
    Posts
    8,849
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmo View Post
    This. It's a free lunch of extra strength for no weight penalty.
    I wouldn't call it a free lunch as it does severely limit your rim choices. It is nice seeing 80-85% of max tension on the non-drive side spokes though. I actually run an offset rim on the front too to help with my front disc hub. It wouldn't be too bad without it but with it I see only ~5-10% tension differential.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •