Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Alfine 11 design

    So the other day it occurred to me how Shimano arranged their planetary gearsets in the Alfine 11. (I might be the only person who finds this interesting.) Hopefully I am not repeating something that has already been posted. I've been goofing around with hub ratios in Excel and found http://john-s-allen.com/gears/hubratios.htm to be really helpful. Anyway, looks to me like they basically started with the design of a Nexus 7 and started improving things.

    So, on Nexus 7 there are four sets of planetary gears, each one of which is only run "one way", that is, to increase or decrease the ratio, and not both. If we call these gears A, B, C and D we have:

    1: 1/A
    2: 1/B
    3: C/A
    4: C/B
    5: D/B
    6: C
    7: D

    Note that A ~= D and B ~= C.

    Now for Alfine 11 we also have four sets of planetary gears, and A ~= D and B ~= C as before. They just allow 3 of the 4 to run both ways.

    1: 1/A * 1/C
    2: 1/A
    3: 1/B
    4: C/A
    5: C/B
    6: D/B
    7: C
    8: D
    9: B*C
    10: B*D
    11: A*D

    My spreadsheet can fairly closely replicate the 7 "derived" gears starting with the ratios of 2, 3, 7 and 8.

    The Nexus 8 / Alfine 8 are totally different. They also have 4 sets of planetary gears, but obtain their ratios as folllows:

    1: 1/A
    2: B/A
    3: C/A
    4: D/A
    5: 1.0
    6: B
    7: C
    8: D

    So there you have it, for what's it worth. Now, owners of the Alfine 11 can obsess about just how many planeteries are spinning around while they charge a hill.

  2. #2
    tcs
    tcs is offline
    Palmer tcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Parts unknown
    Posts
    4,291
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So in your analysis, 7 of the 11 gears are dual stage compounded, and there's no direct drive.

    I'd love to see an instrumented efficiency test on the Alfine 11.
    "When man first set woman on two wheels with a pair of pedals, did he know, I wonder, that he had rent the veil of the harem in twain? A woman on a bicycle has all the world before her where to choose; she can go where she will, no man hindering." The Typewriter Girl, 1899.

    "Every so often a bird gets up and flies some place it's drawn to. I don't suppose it could tell you why, but it does it anyway." Ian Hibell, 1934-2008

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dubuque, IA
    My Bikes
    All City Nature Boy
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cool, I now know how my Alfine 8 is shifting. I had trouble visualizing the gears in the Alfine because the Shifting is much more complex than the Sturmey-Archer 3/5 speeds. I wish the direct drive was higher though for maximum cruzing efficiency, but that's not why I bought it in the first place.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tcs View Post
    So in your analysis, 7 of the 11 gears are dual stage compounded, and there's no direct drive.
    But at least there seems to be no need for triple-compounded gears (such as 3rd and 5th on Rohloff).

    I'm also very excited to be able to understand why the hub favors high ratios instead of low, and why there is that huge gap at the bottom. (They didn't reinforce "1/B" enough to take the torque from "1/C", and they didn't reinforce "1/A" enough to take the torque from "1/D"... only "1/C".) If they had reinforced A and B sufficiently, they could have made a symmetric 13 speed hub (with a 0.47 first gear, which is about 5th gear on a Rohloff).

    Also you can sort of conclude that you can stomp on gear 2 all you like, but gear 1 is more of a risk because its actually the same final planetary stage at work, just with your torque increased by 29% on the input. (I assume that "A" and "B" are the second stage gear sets, because they typically increase torque.) Gear 3 might even be less strong than gear 2, since gear 2 is running a gear set that was significantly reinforced.
    Last edited by trike_guy; 10-18-11 at 02:22 AM.

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It seems that gear 2 it's not that strong:
    http://forums.mtbr.com/internal-gear...cs-696480.html

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by h264 View Post
    It seems that gear 2 it's not that strong:
    http://forums.mtbr.com/internal-gear...cs-696480.html
    Wow, that's a forum I don't think I'll try posting on.

    Anyway I imagine that he just broke gear 2 ("1/A") because that is what he was using to muscle up some particular slope.

    1st gear should really be placing more torque on "1/A" than 2nd gear does. I don't think Shimano would run the torque from "1/A" through "1/C" because if they where willing to do that, then it would have been no trouble to also run "1/B" through "1/C" and thereby eliminate the large gap between 1st and 2nd gears (and make a 12 speed hub). So I stand by my estimation that 1st gear should be weaker than 2nd gear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •