52/39 Chainrings.The 39 is too small
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 519
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
52/39 Chainrings.The 39 is too small
I have a 105 52/39 chainset,but don't really use the 39 ring much.Do shimano do a bigger one like a 42 - 46 inner ring to use with the 52
#2
Senior Member
If you were to replace the 39 with a 42, it would do little to increase the useable gears. You'd just be using one cog larger to get the same gear ratio. A 42/16 and 39/15 are nearly identical. The other difference is you'd shift one cog less, after shifting to the little ring, in order to reach the next lowest ratio in the progression.
Of course you can buy different chainrings, but they work best in matched pairs and you might have to buy an aftermarket brands to get what you want.
Of course you can buy different chainrings, but they work best in matched pairs and you might have to buy an aftermarket brands to get what you want.
#4
Senior Member
Brad
#5
Constant tinkerer
What cassette are you using? Put something like an 11-21 on there and see if the 39 is too small
Yes, they make larger rings. I haven't ridden a 39 in a while due to my love of Biopace. I have a 52/42 double and I like it just fine.
Yes, they make larger rings. I haven't ridden a 39 in a while due to my love of Biopace. I have a 52/42 double and I like it just fine.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Shimano's older road triples (105 and Ultegra) all came geared 52/42/30 and if you find one of those NOS you may be able to buy it for less than a replacement chainring. Swap both of the larger chainrings to your crank arms (the bolt circles are all 130 mm) and you will have the gearing you want and a matched set of rings with no shifting issues.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
Assuming you have ten cogs and like a 12 starting cog you don't get good spacing if the last cog is bigger than a 23 and eschewing the fully cross-chained combination you'll be down shifting when you're spinning along in 52x21 and hit the first false flat that drops your speed below 19 MPH or on the first hill you grind up at 15 MPH.
With 9 cogs or an 11 starting cog (allowing for a 21 big cog so you're using 52x19) the down shift happens at 17 MPH grinding and 21 MPH spinning.
With the same 12 starting cog 39x13 is good for cruising at 24 MPH. Solo that can take 300W on flat ground which is a substantial (and unsustainable) effort for many riders.
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 11-03-11 at 02:53 PM.
#8
Banned
the Paris-Roubaix racers use 53-46 combinations .. 1) because they are strong,
the race is fast,
and the course is not mountainous, and the likelihood of the chain falling off
is lessened. [less chain slack]
Yes chainrings are cut with a different tooth number
than the ones sold with the bike.
you just need to buy the appropriate ones..
your LBS has sources to order from ..
even if they don't have one bought on Spec hanging on a peg.
Shimano may make them , but there are other after-market sources also..
which are comparable..
the race is fast,
and the course is not mountainous, and the likelihood of the chain falling off
is lessened. [less chain slack]
Yes chainrings are cut with a different tooth number
than the ones sold with the bike.
you just need to buy the appropriate ones..
your LBS has sources to order from ..
even if they don't have one bought on Spec hanging on a peg.
Shimano may make them , but there are other after-market sources also..
which are comparable..
Last edited by fietsbob; 11-02-11 at 03:29 PM.
#9
tcarl
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 561
Bikes: Roark, Waterford 1100, 1987 Schwinn Paramount, Nishiki Professional, Bottecchia, 2 Scattantes, 3 Cannondale touring bikes, mtn. bike, cyclocross, hybrid, 1940's era Schwinn
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
I have two Ultegra cranks on two different bikes. I changed one to a 42 inner chainring and quite like it for flatter terrain (Illinois). The other I've left with the 39 and do a lot more "easy gear" spinning with it. I think there's a noticable difference between the 39 and 42. I'd suggest making that change.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I have two Ultegra cranks on two different bikes. I changed one to a 42 inner chainring and quite like it for flatter terrain (Illinois). The other I've left with the 39 and do a lot more "easy gear" spinning with it. I think there's a noticable difference between the 39 and 42. I'd suggest making that change.