Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

How does weight actually matter?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

How does weight actually matter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-11, 07:05 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome. .

There are fifty million demonstrations of this, none of which has overcome the popular misconception. Here is a neat old one: https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...91572259784994 - it doesn't work on earth because feathers are frightened of the earth. This is how come birds can fly.
jolly_ross is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 08:11 AM
  #52  
Mostly harmless ™
Thread Starter
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by jolly_ross
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome. .
I like the way you're reasoning.
That would make perfect sense in a vacuum. Feather and a rock would fall at the same speed (in a vacuum). However, in the real world with air drag, heavier rider (all other things being equal - road, bike etc) will descend faster, because extra weight is not negated with (that much) extra wind drag.

Logic behind this is: at downhill speeds wind drag is a lot more significant resistance to overcome than inertia.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 08:23 AM
  #53  
Icantre Member
 
stonefree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the Bayou City perpetually under construction
Posts: 384

Bikes: 2001 DBR Axis TT, 1998 Trek 5500 OCLV, 1993 Trek 1100, 1971 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1972 Gitane Attic Beater

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
I weigh some 75 kgs and often carry around 10 kgs of stuff (water, food, clothes, books etc). Does a 5 - 9 kg lighter bike really make some noticeable difference? ?
10kg-9kg = +1kg...so answer = no.
stonefree is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 10:42 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by jolly_ross
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome.
You're wrong.

When you make bigger people frontal area (Sd) increases with the square of height while mass goes up with its cube. With more force pulling them down-hill and a lesser drag increase at a given speed big people have a higher terminal velocity where drag (mostly aerodynamic, increasing with the square of velocity) equals the component of their weight vector parallel to the incline.

When you add flab to the same person you can increase weight with no drag increase.

From personal experience:

A 145 pound 5'10" climber is slower down the same grade than a 200 pound rider.

A 110 pound female skydiver in the classic frog-man position who isn't wearing a skin tight jumpsuit and arching her back like a yogi (or wearing weights) might fall 105 MPH while a 250 pound guy who's nickname starts with "Big" will go 145 MPH and be considered an anvil unless he wears a baggy clown suit and perhaps wings. This makes coed naked skydiving more difficult than you'd think.

Inertia is only a factor during acceleration (including deceleration).

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 12-09-11 at 10:50 AM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 10:55 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
CACycling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 4,571

Bikes: 2009 Fuji Roubaix RC; 2011 Fuji Cross 2.0; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by jolly_ross
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome. .

There are fifty million demonstrations of this, none of which has overcome the popular misconception. Here is a neat old one: https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...91572259784994 - it doesn't work on earth because feathers are frightened of the earth. This is how come birds can fly.
My wife and I have virtually identical road bikes. I've got 80 lbs. on her and beat her to the bottom of hills every time.
CACycling is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 10:56 AM
  #56  
Macaws Rock!
 
michaelnel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,513

Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Logic behind this is: at downhill speeds wind drag is a lot more significant resistance to overcome than inertia.
Which is why tandems are so blazingly fast downhill... the weight of two people with the frontal area of one.
__________________
---

San Francisco, California
michaelnel is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 10:58 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A lighter rider- assuming similar skills and bike to a heavier rider- can brake later going into corners. No small feature, this!
benlees is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JBerman
Road Cycling
180
04-11-17 08:29 PM
DropDeadFred
Road Cycling
46
06-14-12 10:04 PM
Exit3
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
30
10-09-10 01:02 PM
Trasselkalle
Alt Bike Culture
23
01-12-10 11:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.