How does weight actually matter?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome. .
There are fifty million demonstrations of this, none of which has overcome the popular misconception. Here is a neat old one: https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...91572259784994 - it doesn't work on earth because feathers are frightened of the earth. This is how come birds can fly.
There are fifty million demonstrations of this, none of which has overcome the popular misconception. Here is a neat old one: https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...91572259784994 - it doesn't work on earth because feathers are frightened of the earth. This is how come birds can fly.
#52
Mostly harmless ™
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome. .
That would make perfect sense in a vacuum. Feather and a rock would fall at the same speed (in a vacuum). However, in the real world with air drag, heavier rider (all other things being equal - road, bike etc) will descend faster, because extra weight is not negated with (that much) extra wind drag.
Logic behind this is: at downhill speeds wind drag is a lot more significant resistance to overcome than inertia.
#53
Icantre Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the Bayou City perpetually under construction
Posts: 384
Bikes: 2001 DBR Axis TT, 1998 Trek 5500 OCLV, 1993 Trek 1100, 1971 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1972 Gitane Attic Beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome.
When you make bigger people frontal area (Sd) increases with the square of height while mass goes up with its cube. With more force pulling them down-hill and a lesser drag increase at a given speed big people have a higher terminal velocity where drag (mostly aerodynamic, increasing with the square of velocity) equals the component of their weight vector parallel to the incline.
When you add flab to the same person you can increase weight with no drag increase.
From personal experience:
A 145 pound 5'10" climber is slower down the same grade than a 200 pound rider.
A 110 pound female skydiver in the classic frog-man position who isn't wearing a skin tight jumpsuit and arching her back like a yogi (or wearing weights) might fall 105 MPH while a 250 pound guy who's nickname starts with "Big" will go 145 MPH and be considered an anvil unless he wears a baggy clown suit and perhaps wings. This makes coed naked skydiving more difficult than you'd think.
Inertia is only a factor during acceleration (including deceleration).
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 12-09-11 at 10:50 AM.
#55
Senior Member
I am unable to convince the heavies in my cycling group of this (possibly because I'm wrong) but here goes: being heavier does not make you descend faster. If you are 10% heavier (say) then there is 10% more gravitational force between you and the earth - but the thing is this is *exactly* offset by there being 10% more inertia for this force to overcome. .
There are fifty million demonstrations of this, none of which has overcome the popular misconception. Here is a neat old one: https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...91572259784994 - it doesn't work on earth because feathers are frightened of the earth. This is how come birds can fly.
There are fifty million demonstrations of this, none of which has overcome the popular misconception. Here is a neat old one: https://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...91572259784994 - it doesn't work on earth because feathers are frightened of the earth. This is how come birds can fly.
#56
Macaws Rock!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,513
Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Which is why tandems are so blazingly fast downhill... the weight of two people with the frontal area of one.
__________________
---
San Francisco, California
---
San Francisco, California
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A lighter rider- assuming similar skills and bike to a heavier rider- can brake later going into corners. No small feature, this!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DropDeadFred
Road Cycling
46
06-14-12 10:04 PM
SurlyLaika
Commuting
70
10-11-11 03:33 PM
Exit3
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
30
10-09-10 01:02 PM