Effective handlebar reach, Soma Sparrow
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Effective handlebar reach, Soma Sparrow
Anyone here used the Soma Sparrow handlebar?
currently trying the medium width 520mm version, and feel like i'd prefer a wider spread hand position
thinking of getting the 560mm but was worried about the effective reach.
This would depend on how the different bars are constructed:
-if the different widths all use identical bends, and simply have the straight swept end sections cut differently, then in order to use the wide hand position I'd also need to push the bars farther forward with a longer stem
; this is problematic since I'm already using a 130mm stem and longer ones are a pain to find in modern faceplate style (needed to mount the curvy bars)
-if the different widths are due to the bends actually being spaced wider then no worries
So, anyone here happen to have tried both variants who might know how they are different? Thanks
currently trying the medium width 520mm version, and feel like i'd prefer a wider spread hand position
thinking of getting the 560mm but was worried about the effective reach.
This would depend on how the different bars are constructed:
-if the different widths all use identical bends, and simply have the straight swept end sections cut differently, then in order to use the wide hand position I'd also need to push the bars farther forward with a longer stem
; this is problematic since I'm already using a 130mm stem and longer ones are a pain to find in modern faceplate style (needed to mount the curvy bars)
-if the different widths are due to the bends actually being spaced wider then no worries
So, anyone here happen to have tried both variants who might know how they are different? Thanks
#2
Happy go lucky
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 286
Bikes: 2010 Nagasawa (Track), EAI Bareknuckle (Track), Custom Jonny Cycles (Track), 90's Eddy Merckx (Road), 2002 Colnago Tecnos, 200? Felt F60 (Road), 1992 Schwinn Paramount Series 3 (Road)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have not tried both variants, but I saw a photo once of all three sizes lined up together. I can't say with any certainty, but it appears that the bends were 100% identical and the only difference was the length of the straight ends. This unfortunately confirms your concern that reach is affected.
Edit: Here's the photo
For what it's worth, I have the mediums too. I think the narrowness is spot on for me in terms of comfort, but the widest ones would probably match the townie look better. You can see how much room I have left after the grips and before the bends with the mediums. There's just enough room for levers but fitting a bell up there could get tight. I have a large bell (mounted sideways to the stem in the photo) and it was too large to mount to the bars in between the grip and the bend. Not physically too large, but I felt like my hands would have been cramped. Largest bars probably would have allowed that better.
Edit: Here's the photo
For what it's worth, I have the mediums too. I think the narrowness is spot on for me in terms of comfort, but the widest ones would probably match the townie look better. You can see how much room I have left after the grips and before the bends with the mediums. There's just enough room for levers but fitting a bell up there could get tight. I have a large bell (mounted sideways to the stem in the photo) and it was too large to mount to the bars in between the grip and the bend. Not physically too large, but I felt like my hands would have been cramped. Largest bars probably would have allowed that better.
Last edited by trevor_ash; 12-04-11 at 11:25 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 1,148
Bikes: Seven Axiom Ti, Trek 620, Masi cylocross (steel). Masi Souleville 8spd, Fat Chance Mtn. (steel), Schwinn Triple Bar cruiser, Mazi Speciale Fix/single, Schwinn Typhoon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If the bars are as pictured above the reach difference will be minimal
#4
Happy go lucky
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 286
Bikes: 2010 Nagasawa (Track), EAI Bareknuckle (Track), Custom Jonny Cycles (Track), 90's Eddy Merckx (Road), 2002 Colnago Tecnos, 200? Felt F60 (Road), 1992 Schwinn Paramount Series 3 (Road)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not too familiar with using bars with this style. For example, does the greater arm spread compensate for the closer reach? I wanted to visualize this. This image overlays the three bars from that photo relative to the clamp. I measured the gaps between the ends, in pixels. For reference the 25.4 clamp area is showing ~38 pixels. That should give you some scale to work with.
I wish manufacturers would just give us better measurements to work with. I was not able to find anything myself.
I'm not sure I'd say this is minimal, but again I don't know if the wider bars somehow compensate. I'm clueless
I wish manufacturers would just give us better measurements to work with. I was not able to find anything myself.
I'm not sure I'd say this is minimal, but again I don't know if the wider bars somehow compensate. I'm clueless
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Speedldew
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
27
07-12-20 04:33 PM