Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

wheel lacing/weight question

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

wheel lacing/weight question

Old 01-23-12, 02:01 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: pittsburghadelphia
Posts: 288

Bikes: types that go fast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wheel lacing/weight question

i have a quick question to appease my curiosity as i dont feel like doing a ton of spocalc stuff. just wondering if a 32 hole 2 cross or a 28 hoe 3 cross would be lighter for the same parts (different drilling aside).

Yeah, I know i could do this on the DT spoke calc. but i dont know if i 100% trust its weights, especially for something so trivial as this. also, some many facturers dont change rim weight per different drillings. so if you have some experience or an opinion i love to hear it. thanks
skeem is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 02:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Spoke length per same gauge...tells the story...+/- weight of 4 spokes.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 02:14 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Calculated Spoke Length * Total Number of Spokes = Gross Length of Spokes Combined

Do it for both wheels...assuming same gauge...should give a two comparative numbers.

It can be assumed that if same gauge and brand - the difference will tell you which will be lighter. Just a difference though - not a grams number.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 02:24 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: pittsburghadelphia
Posts: 288

Bikes: types that go fast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
that was my inclination, but i know drilling the rim more reduces weight etc etc.
skeem is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 03:06 PM
  #5  
Mechanic/Tourist
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,522

Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 486 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by skeem
...drilling the rim more reduces weight etc etc.
Are you kidding? Never mind, I've seen enough weight obsessiveness to know the answer. The weight you save is on the order of a few swallows of water.
cny-bikeman is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 03:11 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Remove More Rim = Add More Nipples
Remove More Nipples = Add More Rim

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 03:41 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Go with 32 hole 3 cross, and don't go all OCD over a few grams..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 04:12 PM
  #8  
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,001

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4335 Post(s)
Liked 2,977 Times in 1,614 Posts
Originally Posted by mrrabbit
Spoke length per same gauge...tells the story...+/- weight of 4 spokes.

=8-)
So the comparison is :
difference in mass of hub 28-32 hole
difference in mass of rim 28-32 hole
difference in mass of 28 longer spokes to 32 shorter spokes
difference in mass of 4 nipples

There... easy calc.
DiabloScott is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 04:14 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
BCRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The 'Wack, BC, Canada
Posts: 5,556

Bikes: Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 35 Posts
The weight of the extra nipples will more than make up for the weight removed by drilling. Just look at the volume of the material involved.

So it comes down to the 28's will be lighter for a few reasons.

It'll use less spokes but they would be a little longer due to using 3x. But the slight length difference won't make up for the fewer spokes. So over all the spoke weight for the 28 will be less.

4 less nipples.

But that's countered by a 4 holes worth of aluminium and the eyelets if the rim uses them. The fact that there's 4 less eyelets more than makes up for the small amount of alloy that replaces them. So the 28 hole rim would actually be a gram or two lighter as well. If neither rim uses eyelets then the 32 would be a gram or so lighter.

Overall the 28 is obviously lighter. No need for spocalc or anything other than simply thinking about it. How much less would depend on the factors.

All in all though this is overly OCD.
BCRider is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 04:14 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Monster Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,049

Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Go with 32 hole 3 cross, and don't go all OCD over a few grams..
This. Far better to go for a stronger and more reliable wheel.
Monster Pete is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 04:14 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,663

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5766 Post(s)
Liked 2,538 Times in 1,404 Posts
Originally Posted by skeem
that was my inclination, but i know drilling the rim more reduces weight etc etc.
Not quite, you drill out aluminum and replace it with a steel ferrule or eyelet (on some rims) plus the weight of an extra spoke plus the weight of a nipple. Plain and simple, same rim with fewer spokes = lighter wheels.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 01-23-12, 05:18 PM
  #12  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
wheels are really no different from bridges.

if you use a weak bridge, you will have to use a lot of pillars.
if you use a strong bridge, you can use less pillars.
if you use a weak bridge with few pillars, your bridge will be frail.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 01-24-12, 12:12 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: pittsburghadelphia
Posts: 288

Bikes: types that go fast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im not concerned about this for weight weenie issues, it was something that has been making me think a lot the past 2 days. in all reality ill probably do 32 hole 2 cross because i weigh 136 lbs and its for race wheels. notwithstanding, i have just been curious about this. my brain has allowed me to reason this on both sides of the argument an i got myself in a mess.

as i said before, im sure the results of such an equation would be a few nominal grams. im "upgrading" from a high mod carbon frame to a caad10 as we speak- the weight, in reality, is a non issue. its one of those things that id like a definitive answer to and i cant satisfy that because i cant afford all the parts required for the experiment to actually weigh them. has anyone actually done measurements of this before? id imagine, if nothing else, drilling out the hubs a few more times makes it lighter...
skeem is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mjoekingz28
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
10
08-14-16 03:02 PM
SesameCrunch
Folding Bikes
16
06-30-13 03:05 AM
polarcreamsoda
Bicycle Mechanics
11
04-11-11 05:13 PM
brianbeech
Road Cycling
33
12-10-10 06:34 PM
Sander Saares
Bicycle Mechanics
9
09-06-10 10:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.