Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Triple chainring replacement question

    Hi,

    I'm considering swapping out the middle chainring from my triple - from a 42 to a 39.

    Because it's the middle chainring will I need to adjust the derailler at all?

    Thanks in advance.
    I want to live.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Probably not if it is shifting well now. If you have STI shifting you will benefit from replacing the middle ring with one designed to work in a triple with ramps and pins.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,785
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You will not have to do anything with the front derailleur as it's position is defined by the big chainring, not the middle or granny. Your shifting from the granny to the middle and the middle to the big ring may be a bit more sluggish since a 39T chainring intended for a double won't have the shifting enhansements provided on your 42 unless you get a 39T ring intended for a current 105 triple.

  4. #4
    dbg
    dbg is offline
    Si Senior dbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Naperville, Illinois
    My Bikes
    2004 Trek 5900 Superlight, 2001 Lemond BA, Dozen other muts
    Posts
    2,253
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    But make sure you match the old chainring spacing. It's possible to insert a "different" chainring and have it a little farther out --especially if you're talking about a 10 speed setup and an older 39, and end up with a gap just large enough for the 10 spd chain to spin freely in between them. Been there. Not cool.
    David Green, Naperville, IL USA (Trek 5900 Superlight), (Lemond BA), (Peugeot UO8 (SS)), (Dozen other muts)

    "The older I get, the better I used to be" --Lee Trevino
    "I told my psychiatrist that everyone hates me. He said I was being ridiculous; everyone hasn't met me yet" --Rodney Dangerfeld

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    unless you get a 39T ring intended for a current 105 triple.
    Is there anyway to check if a chainring is intended for a triple or double? I've had a quick look for what's available and I haven't seen any mention of it. I'll probably be buying from somewhere such as wiggle.
    I want to live.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by damnable View Post
    Is there anyway to check if a chainring is intended for a triple or double? I've had a quick look for what's available and I haven't seen any mention of it. I'll probably be buying from somewhere such as wiggle.
    If it doesn't say it's probably for a double. You haven't said what brand of crankset you have. For smooth operation it may be best to buy a ring of the same brand. There is always someone looking to trade a double for a triple. See if you can make a trade, but include the bottom bracket with the crankset.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Crankset brand is Truvativ. Will go with a 9 speed setup.
    BCD would be 130.

    CRC seem to have a much better range of triple chainrings available than other places.
    I'm trying to work out why this one is so cheap, even though it is Sora.
    http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/M...?ModelID=38171
    Last edited by damnable; 02-03-12 at 04:35 PM.
    I want to live.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,785
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not sure what the BCD on that chainring is and the Chain Reaction site doesn't specify. RSX and I believe Early Sora was 110 mm.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Checking the model number with Shimano it looks to be the newer 9 speed Sora with 130 mm BCD. *shrug*
    I want to live.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •