Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Wheel building questions!

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Wheel building questions!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-12, 04:32 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wheel building questions!

I just picked up a lightly used dt 240 rear hub (28 spoke) and want to build it up. I've installed, overhauled, and swapped nearly every component to be found on a road or mtb, but this will be my first wheel build.

I've largely "retired" from racing but still put in a lot of miles and do the occasional time trial. I'm not the fastest on the road, but am still very fit and can keep with the fast group rides in my area. I'm 6ft and 160.

On to the questions:

a) I'm leaning towards the dt swiss rr 585 rim for its durability, especially given the 28 spoke count. 2x lacing pattern. Any thoughts? Alternates to consider?

b) I'm looking to use bladed spokes. Sapim cx-ray seem to be widely available and frequently recommended. There are a number of DT swiss bladed spoke models available, but little description of what differentiates them (other than the very expensive bladed and double-butted aero-lites). Again, any recommendations?

c) I'll be building with brass nipples, but again am a bit overwhelmed by the options. DT swiss has a number of variations, but again doesn't have much information available on what differentiates them.

d) Any recommendations about where to get the components from? LBS doesn't have any of the parts in stock.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts and recommendations, either on the parts or the build!
Kaio is offline  
Old 02-25-12, 04:49 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Regarding bladed spokes, unless the hub you bought is slotted, your choices will be limited to what fits through the spoke holes on a stock 240S. CX-Rays and Aerolites should fit through them. BikeHubStore and Excel Sports are a couple places I'd buy from. Both CX-Rays and Aerolites are very light-gauge spokes, as you probably deduced, and that's why their thin center sections can be flattened into a blade and still fit through a spoke hole... not a lot of metal there compared to a traditional bladed spoke rolled from a straight 2.0mm spoke.

Regarding DT's brass nipples, they offer the ProLock models with built-in threadlocker at a premium price, as well as non-ProLock hex-headed ones, and conventional slotted-head ones. If you want the threadlocker feature and black nipples are OK, go ProLock. If you don't want the threadlocker feature, I'd suggest going with the conventional style and you can choose from chromed or black.

In terms of rims, the KinLin rims are gaining a following and come in various depths. BikeHubStore carries KinLins. Another widely available option are the various depths of Velocity road rims, which also come in a plethora of colors.


Oh, and you will find a bladed-spoke holding tool useful to control spoke windup. Park Tool has one, the BSH-4.

Last edited by mechBgon; 02-25-12 at 04:53 PM.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 02-25-12, 05:18 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,670

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times in 1,406 Posts
At 160#s you have lots of latitude in spoke and rim selection. As MechBgon said, true bladed spokes require slotted hubs, so you'll probably be happier with what they call Aero or Oval spokes whose blades are only 2.3mm wide to fit standard drilled holes. (2.3mm is the diameter of the thread of a 2mm spoke)

The typical oval spoke is usually comparable to a 1.8/1.5/1.8mm (or 1.8/1.6.1.8) DB spoke, which is fine for your needs. I only use butted spokes anyway, though if you tend to be a bit rough on your wheels you might want to go to 2/1.8/2 for the right side rear, and the oval on the other three flanges, but that's your judgement call.

Do not buy threadlocker nipples, since aero spokes tend to twist like crazy when tightening, and you don't want to encourage that. In any case I think threadlocking for spokes is plain dumb, and grease my spoke threads to minimize twist, and prevent corrosion later.

One thing you need to consider when mixing brands of spokes and nipples is the length of thread. I measure spokes so they'll reach the top of the nipple when tight. Therefore I always look for nipple/spoke combinations that have enough thread that the spoke can go beyond the top by 2-3mm before running out of thread. If you're spokes and nipples cannot do this, plan on a slightly shorter spoke to leave yourself some margin for error.

Lastly, if you're a hard sprinter, or strong hill climber, consider going to 3x on the rear to improve torsional stability, otherwise 2x or 3x doesn't really matter.

BTW- some people despise aero spokes because they're so twisty. I actually like them beacuse they don't twist that much worse than a light DB spoke, but have the advantage of making twist visible.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 02-25-12, 05:30 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Also, I just got around to uploading this at last:


Highly controversial subject, as with many facets of wheelbuilding Some say "Bah! there should be no need for any sort of threadlock or lubrication, because reasons!" But if I don't fill those threads with something, Mother Nature will. And her favorite is road grit.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 12:04 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for this excellent advice. I'll definitely go for the aero/oval spokes, rather than true bladed. A follow-up question regarding spoke length:

Using the DT Swiss spoke calculator, I get a recommended spoke length for d & nd sides (this is a rear build only). There is no mention, however, of nipple length, and these are available in three lengths (12, 14, 16mm). As I mentioned, I'll be ordering the parts, so it won't be possible to determine spoke / nipple overlap ex ante. Given that the spoke calculator rounds to the nearest mm, but I can only get the spokes in 2mm increments, how do I determine correct nipple length?
Kaio is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 12:12 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
For the DT Swiss rim, standard 12mm nipples are a good choice. The longer nipples would accomodate rims that have the nipple seats recessed further into the rim. The idea behind the various nipple lengths is simply to get the spoke-wrench flats where you can reach them, it doesn't affect the spoke length you should choose.

Last edited by mechBgon; 02-26-12 at 12:17 PM.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 12:28 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Kaio
Thanks for this excellent advice. I'll definitely go for the aero/oval spokes, rather than true bladed.
I'll put a plug in for DT Aerolites, I used these in building a set of wheels for myself recently. Surprisingly easy to work with. Very light, kind of pricey. I used brass nipples instead of the supplied aluminum ones that come with the spokes.
well biked is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 12:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,670

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times in 1,406 Posts
Originally Posted by mechBgon
For the DT Swiss rim, standard 12mm nipples are a good choice. The longer nipples would accomodate rims that have the nipple seats recessed further into the rim. The idea behind the various nipple lengths is simply to get the spoke-wrench flats where you can reach them, it doesn't affect the spoke length you should choose.
+1

Since the spoke should reach into and engage the head of the nipple, the length of the (non-structural) shank shouldn't make a difference. There may, however be a minor difference, because the length of thread within nipples varies, and with some - regardless of length - there may be little or no ability to thread beyond the top, reducing your margin ofr error and making a correct spoke length more critical.

Since the spokes I use have 10mm of thread, I use 12mm nipples with 8mm of thread. This will cause the spoke thread to show if it's 2mm to short, or give 2mm room at the top if too long. Total tolerance when I measure spokes is therefore just shy of ±2mm from the top of the nipple. In practice I shoot for 1mm shy of that -0mm, +2mm.

Other than rims with thicker bottoms, the only "benefit" of longer nipples is a longer skirt to hide threads when the spokes are too short. This makes them popular for high production where, for example they might use the same spokes on both sides of rear wheels.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 02-26-12, 12:55 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCXFK...En_PcY4VLuZMgh

Explains why nipple and thread behavior need to be tested as part of ERD and spoke length calculation. If you don't have the threads and nipples you will use on-hand - just ask the provider you will order from to test for you and tell you where their spokes end up in their nipples.

Not rocket science, just precaution.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 01:55 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by mechBgon
Highly controversial subject, as with many facets of wheelbuilding Some say "Bah! there should be no need for any sort of threadlock or lubrication, because reasons!" But if I don't fill those threads with something, Mother Nature will. And her favorite is road grit.
I've always used anti-seize and haven't had any problems with my alloy nipples turning freely and being reusable when it's time for a rim replacement.

Last year I swapped a Reflex Clincher installed when Mavic still made those (maybe 1997 or 1998 meaning the wheel had been exposed to rain and a little snow/road salt from Boulder, CO where I lived through 2006) for a new Open Pro without issue.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 05:52 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,670

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times in 1,406 Posts
Originally Posted by mrrabbit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCXFK...En_PcY4VLuZMgh

Explains why nipple and thread behavior need to be tested as part of ERD and spoke length calculation. ..... just ask the provider you will order from to test for you and tell you where their spokes end up in their nipples.
Not rocket science, just precaution.

=8-)
+1 one of my long term pet peeves about spokes and nipples is that thread length specs. are so hard to find. The thread lengths of both the spoke and nipple are critical info because that determines the maximum final spoke height. Over the years I've seen mixed brand combinations so poor that the thread would bottom out before the spoke was halfway into the nipples head.

I used to ask for this information, as in "what is the thread length of your 12mm nipple?" and get answers like 12mm (wrong), or be treated like I was from another planet, or my favorite answer "standard. why does it matter?"

This is one of the reasons I suggest staying with spokes and nipples you're familiar with, and likewise always using the same spoke length calculator. The subtleties of the small unpublished variations gives builders, who stay with proven and familiar stuff, a home field advantage.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 02-26-12, 07:18 PM
  #12  
dbg
Si Senior
 
dbg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 2,669

Bikes: Too Numerous (not)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Bladed and oval spokes are so much more expensive. Ouch. Here's a homemade tool that can help keep the blades from twisting. I created it to work on some straight pull spokes that started slipping but I use them on all my blade builds (not so many; too expensive). Those blades seem to twist more than regular spokes.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bladedspoketool.jpg (65.4 KB, 66 views)
dbg is offline  
Old 02-26-12, 09:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Kaio
... A follow-up question regarding spoke length:

Using the DT Swiss spoke calculator, I get a recommended spoke length for d & nd sides (this is a rear build only). There is no mention, however, of nipple length, and these are available in three lengths (12, 14, 16mm). As I mentioned, I'll be ordering the parts, so it won't be possible to determine spoke / nipple overlap ex ante. Given that the spoke calculator rounds to the nearest mm, but I can only get the spokes in 2mm increments, how do I determine correct nipple length?
i've seen and used spoke calc programs that support multiple nipple length input. the longer the nipple length the shorter the recommended spoke length, according to the program. FWIW.

edit: but as has been mentioned, nipples of a given length do not, in my experience, necessarily exhibit similar thread lengths, so well, good luck?

Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 02-26-12 at 09:56 PM.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 09-05-22, 09:17 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
spoke length question

I am building up a wheel with a nuvinci hub and a 650B rim (ERD= 566), this is basically a symmetrical wheel as there is no need for dish, at issue is that each flange diameter is 125 mm, the manual recommends building the wheel cross TWO, is this because, as the flange is so large, if you build a cross 3, will the spoke head at the rim will be at an adverse angle?

Basically, what is the relationship between hub flange diameter and recommended cross pattern, are they related?
pachyderm56 is offline  
Old 09-05-22, 10:09 PM
  #15  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,858

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1787 Post(s)
Liked 1,261 Times in 870 Posts
Originally Posted by pachyderm56
I am building up a wheel with a nuvinci hub and a 650B rim (ERD= 566), this is basically a symmetrical wheel as there is no need for dish, at issue is that each flange diameter is 125 mm, the manual recommends building the wheel cross TWO, is this because, as the flange is so large, if you build a cross 3, will the spoke head at the rim will be at an adverse angle?

Basically, what is the relationship between hub flange diameter and recommended cross pattern, are they related?
You pretty much have it.
To further implant the idea, imagine a 20" diameter hub in a 22" ID rim.
Now imagine trying to do cross 3.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 09-05-22, 10:57 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,921
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1815 Post(s)
Liked 1,693 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by pachyderm56
I am building up a wheel with a nuvinci hub and a 650B rim (ERD= 566), this is basically a symmetrical wheel as there is no need for dish, at issue is that each flange diameter is 125 mm, the manual recommends building the wheel cross TWO, is this because, as the flange is so large, if you build a cross 3, will the spoke head at the rim will be at an adverse angle?

Basically, what is the relationship between hub flange diameter and recommended cross pattern, are they related?
You dredge up a 10 year old thread for what reason? It has nothing to do with what you want to do. Start your own
alcjphil is online now  
Old 09-06-22, 09:38 AM
  #17  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by alcjphil
You dredge up a 10 year old thread for what reason? It has nothing to do with what you want to do. Start your own
Sorry, I don't use the site often and could not find where to start a new thread, perhaps you could explain how to "ask a question, start a new thread"
pachyderm56 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mainstreetexile
Bicycle Mechanics
10
03-05-17 07:17 PM
Gerryattrick
Bicycle Mechanics
14
01-07-16 09:51 AM
illusiumd
Bicycle Mechanics
3
12-09-15 01:08 PM
Charles Ramsey
Tandem Cycling
1
04-21-11 03:40 PM
zacster
Bicycle Mechanics
11
01-31-10 07:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.