Newly built A23 wheelset - heavy / unbalanced towards pinned joint - reccomendations?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,712
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,429 Posts
Before making any permanent modifications, try slipping some weights over the valve, and balance it so it spins evenly in air (off the ground). The ride the wheel and I suspect you'll still feel an imbalance.
That's because the effects of radial error on the mounted tire is making the wheel like a big cam and the axle rises and falls (and/or the tire compresses) with each revolution. The cam effect is greater than the effects of the imbalance, so there's a good chance that you're correcting the wrong thing.
That's because the effects of radial error on the mounted tire is making the wheel like a big cam and the axle rises and falls (and/or the tire compresses) with each revolution. The cam effect is greater than the effects of the imbalance, so there's a good chance that you're correcting the wrong thing.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
Can't wait for the day the OP comes back telling us about ingressed water sloshing around...
=8-p
=8-p
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#29
Senior Member
If you've got your wheels trued to 0.18mm, I doubt you'd be able to feel the difference in 17g of imbalance. The RPMs and speeds that a bicycle wheel achieves isn't sufficient for that amount to be noticeable. Heck, when I upgraded my wheels for downhilling (and hit 72mph), I removed about 100gm of lead-weights and didn't have any imbalance issues.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Sporting goods stores with well equipped fishing sections sell lead split-shot or lead "tape' that can be wrapped around the spokes opposite the heavy spot.
#31
30 YR Wrench
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,006
Bikes: Waterford R-33, Madone 6.5, Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I've been riding bikes and building wheels, oh, for about 30 years and have never, ever been able to detect any issues with wheel imbalance while riding, and I'm pretty anal about vibrations. I'd love to see this wheel in person. When I can feel a consistent vibe up through the steering when riding at speed, it's inevitably tire related. ALL bike wheels are out of balance. I've been to shops in all 50 states and never seen a bicycle wheel balancing machine....probably because the need never comes up.
But I will say engineers and those who fancy themselves as such are inevitably the worst customers. Dunno why.....
But I will say engineers and those who fancy themselves as such are inevitably the worst customers. Dunno why.....
#33
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
as a mechanical engineer who used to work as a bike mechanic, I have to say you might be right. My favorite bike shop moment was when I told someone he'd be back. He asserted he wouldn't because he was a grad student in mechanical engineering. I was kinda surprised when he came back.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,852
Bikes: Click on the #YOLO
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
If you've got your wheels trued to 0.18mm, I doubt you'd be able to feel the difference in 17g of imbalance. The RPMs and speeds that a bicycle wheel achieves isn't sufficient for that amount to be noticeable. Heck, when I upgraded my wheels for downhilling (and hit 72mph), I removed about 100gm of lead-weights and didn't have any imbalance issues.
What hills do you go down, equinox?
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
OP is machinist with, as you would guess, a machinist's personality. some of the most precision obsessed people in the world. who else could build a v-12 engine (f1 ferrari) that revs to 18,000 rpm without exploding? let'em fuss with it.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: River City, OR
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
UPDATE:
Wheels were out of balance 17g towards the pinned joint.
that's the equivalent of two 1/4x1" bolts !
After drilling 14 holes in the inner rim I have not made a dent in the weight
A change of only 3g, It looks like I will have to add weight to make this wheel sit well.
Wheels were out of balance 17g towards the pinned joint.
that's the equivalent of two 1/4x1" bolts !
After drilling 14 holes in the inner rim I have not made a dent in the weight
A change of only 3g, It looks like I will have to add weight to make this wheel sit well.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
17g sounds like a bloody lot; I wouldn't be all that surprised if that's verging on perceivable. Even it isn't, I'd be inclined to balance it out just to appease my anal streak; done it before. I used a blob of electrical solder, melted to a shape that could be taped into the rim well without interfering with the beads. I knew it made stuff-all difference, but banishing the pendulum effect just made me feel better about my bike.
Oh yeah, Velocity lists the A23's weight as 426g.
What the flying ****?! That's a hell of a wheel upgrade.
+1 more info on this insane creation. You must have a thread...
Oh yeah, Velocity lists the A23's weight as 426g.
What the flying ****?! That's a hell of a wheel upgrade.
+1 more info on this insane creation. You must have a thread...
Last edited by unterhausen; 05-11-12 at 06:09 PM. Reason: please don't defeat the censor
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,712
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,429 Posts
In any case, it's academic because you couldn't feel that imbalance at bicycle speeds, especially when masked by the wheels eccentricity.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#39
Canuck in the mud again
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: West of TO, Canada
Posts: 48
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Surly Pugsley custom, GF Nirvana, Miele classic road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am mostly stunned at how a wheel can have that much extra on one side. It's 4% of the weight of the rim. Now, once built up the wheels are 816g and 653g, so the difference percentage wise is much less. (even less so once I add 300G of tube, rubber and rim tape)
I re-trued them to be within .010" radially and axially using a dial indicator. I'm going to re-assemble them, and get a bunch of extra valve nuts, and try them again with and without the extra weight to see if I can tell at all or if it's just in my head.
And, yes I am not discounting that this could be a futile question, but discoveries don't happen by adhering to status quo.
#40
Senior Member
I taped the bolts to the opposite side of the wheel, kept on adjusting till the wheel didn't fall either way, then weighed the tape and bolts.
I am mostly stunned at how a wheel can have that much extra on one side. It's 4% of the weight of the rim. Now, once built up the wheels are 816g and 653g, so the difference percentage wise is much less. (even less so once I add 300G of tube, rubber and rim tape)
I re-trued them to be within .010" radially and axially using a dial indicator. I'm going to re-assemble them, and get a bunch of extra valve nuts, and try them again with and without the extra weight to see if I can tell at all or if it's just in my head.
And, yes I am not discounting that this could be a futile question, but discoveries don't happen by adhering to status quo.
I am mostly stunned at how a wheel can have that much extra on one side. It's 4% of the weight of the rim. Now, once built up the wheels are 816g and 653g, so the difference percentage wise is much less. (even less so once I add 300G of tube, rubber and rim tape)
I re-trued them to be within .010" radially and axially using a dial indicator. I'm going to re-assemble them, and get a bunch of extra valve nuts, and try them again with and without the extra weight to see if I can tell at all or if it's just in my head.
And, yes I am not discounting that this could be a futile question, but discoveries don't happen by adhering to status quo.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,296 Times
in
2,946 Posts
Campy's approach (on their lower priced wheels) is to use a heavier spoke opposite the seam. On their more expensive wheels, they machine away varying amounts of material from the inside of the rim.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I taped the bolts to the opposite side of the wheel, kept on adjusting till the wheel didn't fall either way, then weighed the tape and bolts.
I am mostly stunned at how a wheel can have that much extra on one side. It's 4% of the weight of the rim. Now, once built up the wheels are 816g and 653g, so the difference percentage wise is much less. (even less so once I add 300G of tube, rubber and rim tape)
I re-trued them to be within .010" radially and axially using a dial indicator. I'm going to re-assemble them, and get a bunch of extra valve nuts, and try them again with and without the extra weight to see if I can tell at all or if it's just in my head.
And, yes I am not discounting that this could be a futile question, but discoveries don't happen by adhering to status quo.
I am mostly stunned at how a wheel can have that much extra on one side. It's 4% of the weight of the rim. Now, once built up the wheels are 816g and 653g, so the difference percentage wise is much less. (even less so once I add 300G of tube, rubber and rim tape)
I re-trued them to be within .010" radially and axially using a dial indicator. I'm going to re-assemble them, and get a bunch of extra valve nuts, and try them again with and without the extra weight to see if I can tell at all or if it's just in my head.
And, yes I am not discounting that this could be a futile question, but discoveries don't happen by adhering to status quo.
#43
Senior Member
1. find heavy-spot of wheel with no tube and tyre. Determine the location of heavy-spot and mass of weight necessary to balance. Call these variables Rp & Rw. Mark Rp on the rim.
2. mount just tube + valve-nut and pump up to same OD as tyre. Determine the location of heavy-spot and mass of weight necessary to balance. Call these variables Up & Uw. Mark Up on the tube
3. remove tube & valve-nut and mount bare tyre to wheel. Determine the location of heavy-spot and mass of weight necessary to balance. Call these variables Tp & Tw. Mark Tp on the tyre.
2. mount just tube + valve-nut and pump up to same OD as tyre. Determine the location of heavy-spot and mass of weight necessary to balance. Call these variables Up & Uw. Mark Up on the tube
3. remove tube & valve-nut and mount bare tyre to wheel. Determine the location of heavy-spot and mass of weight necessary to balance. Call these variables Tp & Tw. Mark Tp on the tyre.
Now remove all components and weights. Mount tyre on wheel and position heavy-spot (Tp) somewhere between the rim's heavy-spot (Rp) and tube's heavy-spot (Up) on the side with greater separation. So if rim's heavy-spot is at 180-degrees and tube's heaviness is at 20-degrees, place the tyre's heavy-spot at 280-degrees. Then mount the tube and pump up.
Finally, balance the entire assembly and you'll find that the weight needed is minimized. This is similar to how auto-tyres are mounted. Tyres have a painted dot on them where the lightest spot is (opposite the heavy end). The auto-tech then mounts the tyre with the spot next to the valve-stem to place the heavy spot of the tyre opposite the heavy spot of rim. On my high-speed cars, like the +240mph 968-Turbo Bonneville contender, I balance the wheels after they're mounted on the car. This will incorporate the imbalance caused by lug-nuts of different masses and brake-rotor imperfections as well. At 210mph, I had to use metal valve-caps with O-ring seals because the centripetal forces causes the shraeder valve-core to depress and leak out air...
Last edited by DannoXYZ; 05-11-12 at 12:11 PM.
#44
Banned
The valve stem is on the opposite side of the wheel,
if the OCD based issue,
of the bridge piece weight across the seam bothers you,
maybe a carbon fiber rimmed wheel set will be more satisfactory..
if the OCD based issue,
of the bridge piece weight across the seam bothers you,
maybe a carbon fiber rimmed wheel set will be more satisfactory..
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
I rather doubt that. It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out. And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
#46
Senior Member
Really?
I rather doubt that. It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out. And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
I rather doubt that. It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out. And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
#47
A little North of Hell
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
imbalance
It all depends on the method. Some welded rims use a sleeve, or tooling jig inserted before welding.
A method of flash/butt welding an aluminum bicycle wheel rim, in which an aluminum sleeve having a dielectric anodized hardcoat surface finish is inserted into the center of the rim in order to support the interior walls of the rim during the welding process, is disclosed. The walls of a wheel rim or other similar metal profile defines an inner space in a tubular section of the rim. The sleeve is partially inserted into a first end of the rim and partially inserted into a second end of the rim. During the welding process, an electric current flows across a small space or gap between the two ends. The electric current melts the ends, at which time the two ends are pressed together in order to forge them into a single piece. The metal sleeve supports the inner walls of the profile in order to prevent collapse of the wall during welding. Due to the dielectric coating, the sleeve does not affect the welding circuit.
Really?
I rather doubt that.
It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out.
And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
I rather doubt that.
It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out.
And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
"For entry-level models, Dynamic Balance™ is obtained by using two oversized spokes in the section opposite the joint.
The result is a wheel with perfectly balanced rotational dynamics."
https://www.fulcrumwheels.com/en/tech.../road/rdb-road
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Really?
I rather doubt that. It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out. And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
I rather doubt that. It'd either have to be a minimal seam, or a ridiculously heavier spoke for that to work out. And unless you pick a really oddball material, the heavier spoke won't stretch the same as the other spokes, and I can't imagine a trusted manufacturer doing that deliberately - even if it isn't immediately critical.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,514 Times
in
2,857 Posts
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Yeah Danno.
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!
Link!