Rear mech medium cage with triple
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rear mech medium cage with triple
I gave my LBS an XT rear mech and chain to fit today and I was told that I had bought the wrong size. They fitted it anyway and said that it should be fine but try to avoid Big - Big gearing.
My set up is 22/32/44 with 11-32
I have rode it around town and it is shifting fine and very responsive, it does look stretched to max when using certain gears. Is there any advantage using a medium cage over the correct long cage ? More importantly, will any part of my drive-train wear quicker due to incorrect cage size ? I have read on other forums that some people are using the same setup but out of choice and mention no problems but fail to mention the dis-advantage. I'm curious because my entire drive train is brand new; I do not want to damage/wear it out.
My set up is 22/32/44 with 11-32
I have rode it around town and it is shifting fine and very responsive, it does look stretched to max when using certain gears. Is there any advantage using a medium cage over the correct long cage ? More importantly, will any part of my drive-train wear quicker due to incorrect cage size ? I have read on other forums that some people are using the same setup but out of choice and mention no problems but fail to mention the dis-advantage. I'm curious because my entire drive train is brand new; I do not want to damage/wear it out.
Last edited by Peyote; 03-02-12 at 04:55 PM. Reason: ...
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 937
Bikes: CCM Torino 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The only disadvantage of a shorter cage derailleur over a longer cage one is that the derailleur cannot take up as much chain slack, and so the gear spread (called the 'capacity' of the derailleur) you use is limited. If you have a derialleur with insufficient capacity for your particular gear setup, either the chain will go slack when you use the small chainring and small cogs, or you will run out of chain when you try to use the larger chainring and larger cogs. If the derailleur is not able to go into the big-big combo, but you inadvertently shift into it, you can damage your derialleur, chain, or even your frame.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only disadvantage of a shorter cage derailleur over a longer cage one is that the derailleur cannot take up as much chain slack, and so the gear spread (called the 'capacity' of the derailleur) you use is limited. If you have a derialleur with insufficient capacity for your particular gear setup, either the chain will go slack when you use the small chainring and small cogs, or you will run out of chain when you try to use the larger chainring and larger cogs. If the derailleur is not able to go into the big-big combo, but you inadvertently shift into it, you can damage your derialleur, chain, or even your frame.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you set the chain length correctly (usually with the big-big +1" method) the derailleur will work and shouldn't damage anything. The only problem will be with the chain going slack in the small-small gears. If you tend to use those gears, it's best to use the correct length derailleur.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you set the chain length correctly (usually with the big-big +1" method) the derailleur will work and shouldn't damage anything. The only problem will be with the chain going slack in the small-small gears. If you tend to use those gears, it's best to use the correct length derailleur.
I think I will stick with it plus a lesson learned.
Thank you all !
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
I gave my LBS an XT rear mech and chain to fit today and I was told that I had bought the wrong size. They fitted it anyway and said that it should be fine but try to avoid Big - Big gearing.
My set up is 22/32/44 with 11-32
I have rode it around town and it is shifting fine and very responsive, it does look stretched to max when using certain gears. Is there any advantage using a medium cage over the correct long cage ? More importantly, will any part of my drive-train wear quicker due to incorrect cage size ? I have read on other forums that some people are using the same setup but out of choice and mention no problems but fail to mention the dis-advantage. I'm curious because my entire drive train is brand new; I do not want to damage/wear it out.
My set up is 22/32/44 with 11-32
I have rode it around town and it is shifting fine and very responsive, it does look stretched to max when using certain gears. Is there any advantage using a medium cage over the correct long cage ? More importantly, will any part of my drive-train wear quicker due to incorrect cage size ? I have read on other forums that some people are using the same setup but out of choice and mention no problems but fail to mention the dis-advantage. I'm curious because my entire drive train is brand new; I do not want to damage/wear it out.
However, your gearing has a spread of 43 teeth, which is fairly high capacity. It might be your medium cage is actually overtaxed.
If you put your gears in the small small position, look at where the chain comes close to the jockey wheel (closest to the cassette). If it clears the chain by 1.5 cm or less, you shouldn't add any more links, and your derailleur is barely able to handle what you have. If it clears by a few cm, you can add one link at a time to see if you can loosen up the derailleur at the big-big extreme without making the chain drag on the jockey wheel.
I could imagine prolonged tight running causing wear to the jockey and idler wheels, eventually.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If I were you, I would lengthen the chain so that It can go into the BIG-BIG combo but slack out in the small-small combo till you can replace the RD with a Long cage. You will not be paying attention one time and accidentally shift BIG-BIG and ruin your RD or worse. Bottom line, get the correct RD!
#9
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,505
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3652 Post(s)
Liked 5,391 Times
in
2,736 Posts
Clearly if you can shift to the big/big you are ok if not optimal. Shift to the small/small and see if there is still tension on the chain. Visualize what adding another link would do. If it looks like your RD could handle another link or more, your chain may have been sized short. It's possible your LBS may be playing a little game with you since you brought in a component you purchased elsewhere.
#10
Fred-ish
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kyumin2lee
Bicycle Mechanics
7
04-22-18 07:31 PM
racer51970
Bicycle Mechanics
4
08-04-11 09:26 PM