Increasing dropout spread
#1
Fail Boat crewman
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PDX
Posts: 675
Bikes: Reynolds 853 Jamis Quest 1990s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Increasing dropout spread
I have my eye on a trek 660 circa 1985. I will need to cold set the dropouts.
Sheldon seems to be a fan of the 2x4, and another site advocates using all thread, nuts and washers with a crescent wrench and an alternative to this is to use a turn buckle to make sure that one turn is one turn.
Then there is something about using string to align the frame?
Can anyone shed some light on this mysterious process for me.
Thanks
Sheldon seems to be a fan of the 2x4, and another site advocates using all thread, nuts and washers with a crescent wrench and an alternative to this is to use a turn buckle to make sure that one turn is one turn.
Then there is something about using string to align the frame?
Can anyone shed some light on this mysterious process for me.
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
There's nothing too mysterious about the process. You have one basic objective which is to spread the dropouts equally on both sides so the wheel remains centered in the frame (assumes it started out centered).
I'm not a fan at all of the turnbuckle method for a number of reasons. The main one is based on the physics of bending steel. Bending steel involves increasing stress to flex it until it reaches the yield point at which it will bend. You can demonstrate this principle with the spring from a cheap ballpoint pen. Pull it apart a bit and it springs back to the original length, but if you go too far it'll deform and it'll spring back to a longer length.
Applying this to your bike and you'll you'll understand why I don't like the turnbuckle method. As you tighten the turnbuckle the frame will spring open fairly symmetrically because the chainstays are of similar strength. But once one side reaches it's yield point and begins to actually deform no more tension can be added so the second will never bend, and all the permanent distortion will be to one side, spoiling the symmetry.
So you need to bend from one side at a time, carefully checking that you're only going half way. I use a method similar to what SB proposes. I make a gauge the width of the dropouts from an axle, or scrap of anything stiff I can cut to length. Then I bend one stay being careful to know which. You can use a 2x4 if you like or do as I do and lay the bike flat, and stand on one stay about half way to the BB, and lifting the other holding it from the end. The one I'm holding will bend will flex feeling increasingly "heavy" until I feel it begin to move, at which I stop and check with a gauge. With practice you can judge the amount of bend you create, but I expect you'll do it by degrees until you have half the spread. Then flip the bike and repeat for the second side.
When finished you might check with the string method to see that the frame is aligned. Actually you might what to do a string test first, so if it isn't right you can align it at the same time as you spread it.
This is actually very easy in practice and, unless you're mechanically declined, you shouldn't have any problem.
BTW- I didn't look up your bike, but it has to be steel, otherwise none of the above applies.
I'm not a fan at all of the turnbuckle method for a number of reasons. The main one is based on the physics of bending steel. Bending steel involves increasing stress to flex it until it reaches the yield point at which it will bend. You can demonstrate this principle with the spring from a cheap ballpoint pen. Pull it apart a bit and it springs back to the original length, but if you go too far it'll deform and it'll spring back to a longer length.
Applying this to your bike and you'll you'll understand why I don't like the turnbuckle method. As you tighten the turnbuckle the frame will spring open fairly symmetrically because the chainstays are of similar strength. But once one side reaches it's yield point and begins to actually deform no more tension can be added so the second will never bend, and all the permanent distortion will be to one side, spoiling the symmetry.
So you need to bend from one side at a time, carefully checking that you're only going half way. I use a method similar to what SB proposes. I make a gauge the width of the dropouts from an axle, or scrap of anything stiff I can cut to length. Then I bend one stay being careful to know which. You can use a 2x4 if you like or do as I do and lay the bike flat, and stand on one stay about half way to the BB, and lifting the other holding it from the end. The one I'm holding will bend will flex feeling increasingly "heavy" until I feel it begin to move, at which I stop and check with a gauge. With practice you can judge the amount of bend you create, but I expect you'll do it by degrees until you have half the spread. Then flip the bike and repeat for the second side.
When finished you might check with the string method to see that the frame is aligned. Actually you might what to do a string test first, so if it isn't right you can align it at the same time as you spread it.
This is actually very easy in practice and, unless you're mechanically declined, you shouldn't have any problem.
BTW- I didn't look up your bike, but it has to be steel, otherwise none of the above applies.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
A nice touch is to make the dropouts parallel again afterwards with a crescent wrench. Can be done well enough by eye with care.
Derailleur hanger will need realignment, particularly if using >8spd.
Derailleur hanger will need realignment, particularly if using >8spd.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 246
Bikes: 91 Trek franken '81 Schwinn Voyager
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've seen the spreading done with a bushing on each side of the bottom bracket and the frame held in the comfort zone by a large vise. It puts the chainstays right at shoulder level and there's quite a bit of control. It's cool. Can anyone tell me what the bracket/bushing thing is and where I can get one?
thanks
thanks
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,447
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4236 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
I've used the method involving a long bit of threaded rod with washers and bolts the inside of each dropout and turning equal amounts (not sure that's really necessary, but that's what someone suggested. It worked for me, but was sort of a pain because, as FBinNY suggests, one side moved out further than the other. This meant I had to put the side that went out further down and put pressure on the seattube until the spacing was equal. Took several tries to get right. If I had it to do over again I would either have bought the 2x4 or paid the bike shop the $50 they wanted to do it, but the day I wanted to do it the bike shop was closed and I am car free so transporting a 3 ft length of threaded rod and some washers home from the hardware store was easier than a longer 2x4. Also, I got two pieces of threaded rod, so I could use them to align the dropouts when I was done. That worked ok.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
I've seen the spreading done with a bushing on each side of the bottom bracket and the frame held in the comfort zone by a large vise. It puts the chainstays right at shoulder level and there's quite a bit of control. It's cool. Can anyone tell me what the bracket/bushing thing is and where I can get one?
thanks
thanks
This isn't complicated and doesn't need to be made so. If you wish to have more leverage or control then my lift from the floor method offers, put the 2x4 in a vise sticking out enough to reach the length of the chainstays to the BB. Slip the chainstays over the BB and bend to one side by pulling on the frame. If you like you can drive a nail into the side of the 2x4 down near the vise for the drop out to rest on to help keep the frame from slipping down.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7
Fail Boat crewman
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PDX
Posts: 675
Bikes: Reynolds 853 Jamis Quest 1990s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So it sounds as if the 2x4 works the best, but then do you have to realign the dropout hanger for the rear d?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
If you do the math, the change in angle for a 3mm spread is miniscule. This is why it isn't absolutely necessary to resquare the dropouts parallel, though I prefer to do so (but then again I have the tools necessary to do this correctly).
Likewise with the RD hanger, if you have the tool go ahead and realign it, since it'll be off 4-6mm front to back over the diameter of the wheel (assuming it was right before). On the other hand, if it was OK before, then that error isn't enough to create any issues. In any case, if you have the tool needed to check and square a hanger it's always good practice to check it before mounting the RD, because you never know.
Likewise with the RD hanger, if you have the tool go ahead and realign it, since it'll be off 4-6mm front to back over the diameter of the wheel (assuming it was right before). On the other hand, if it was OK before, then that error isn't enough to create any issues. In any case, if you have the tool needed to check and square a hanger it's always good practice to check it before mounting the RD, because you never know.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
Banned
People have popped loose brake and chainstay bridges,
... if you tool up so as to restrict the spread there,
so it happens just past that point,
that would be smart.
... if you tool up so as to restrict the spread there,
so it happens just past that point,
that would be smart.
#10
Constant tinkerer
Are you just going from 126 to 130mm? If so you don't "have" to cold set and I have never bothered on this kind of change. It is easy enough to spread the dropouts when installing the rear wheel.
#11
Fail Boat crewman
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PDX
Posts: 675
Bikes: Reynolds 853 Jamis Quest 1990s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe that it is a 4mm adjustment. I know that I do not "HAVE" to do it, but I like things done right. Plus how would this affect the bearing on the rear wheel if I did not spread it.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Washington, PA/Rochester, NY
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some sort of clamping action to protect the welds seems like a good idea. But the amount of stress being applied here isn't that great. If they fail from bending the frame such a small amount, I think I might prefer they break in the shop than on the road.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The clamping pressure of the skewer is FAR far greater than the spring tension of a 126mm dropout being used on a 130mm axle.
#14
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,526
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
No affect at all. 4mm (2mm per side), you are talking about 1/16 inch per side or so. I would not cold set, just squeeze it in (it will not take much).
#15
Fail Boat crewman
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PDX
Posts: 675
Bikes: Reynolds 853 Jamis Quest 1990s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If y'all agree with that then I will forgo the cold set. I would still need to reset the rear d hanger or is the spread to minimal to worry about?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I shoved my 130mm wheel into my rear dropouts that were around 124mm and didn't change anything else out other than the low and high limit screw settings for the derailleur since i went from a 6 speed freewheel to a 7 speed cassette. I didn't bother cold setting or anything. Works fine.
I think you are rather overthinking this. Just relax, shove your new wheel in place and possibly adjust the limit screws and go ride.
I think you are rather overthinking this. Just relax, shove your new wheel in place and possibly adjust the limit screws and go ride.
#17
Fail Boat crewman
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PDX
Posts: 675
Bikes: Reynolds 853 Jamis Quest 1990s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I always over think, plan, and do.
Plan for the worst and expect tragedy.
That phrase is tattooed on my spine in Aramaic.
Plan for the worst and expect tragedy.
That phrase is tattooed on my spine in Aramaic.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've used Sheldon's posted 2x4 method recently on a somewhat skewed rear triangle on a Bianchi Limited 1988. It had 126mm dropout spacing that was warped just a couple of mm to the left. I spread the right about 3mm and the left about 1mm using a 2x4 about 6 ft long on the ground with some cardboard to protect the paint. Took about 8 iterations on the right side and 4 iterations on the left side to get it right. There is some elastic deformation you need to overcome. So you may need to flex a side 5mm to move it 1/2mm plastically. Each frame is different so play around at first.
But after dropout and RD re-alignment by eyeball, I used tools borrowed from a neighbour and confirmed that eyeballing isn't far off at all. And quite acceptable for riding. The benefit from spreading to 130mm is the ease with which swapping wheels and installing hubs becomes. You don't get caught in the dilemma during wheel insertions and removals wondering if the QR is too tight or misaligned or if it's the RD and chain that isn't in the proper position because you forgot to shift to the smallest cog, etc that is preventing the proper seating of the axles. It's not a big benefit, but nice to have.
But after dropout and RD re-alignment by eyeball, I used tools borrowed from a neighbour and confirmed that eyeballing isn't far off at all. And quite acceptable for riding. The benefit from spreading to 130mm is the ease with which swapping wheels and installing hubs becomes. You don't get caught in the dilemma during wheel insertions and removals wondering if the QR is too tight or misaligned or if it's the RD and chain that isn't in the proper position because you forgot to shift to the smallest cog, etc that is preventing the proper seating of the axles. It's not a big benefit, but nice to have.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Y9ou have to be carefull because as somebody mentioned, the brake bridge or the bridge between the chainstays can pop out, saw it once.
I have used two rods and with washers and bolts, one at each side then you go turning the bolts the same turns at both side. From 126 to 130 mm the rear end needs to spread around 150 to 160 but it depends on the steel also. Some reynolds is pretty easy to bend, the last bike i did was mine and had Columbus SL (all the tubes) and that one took me like 45 mins doing it really slow. The other thing I did was to put like a belt or a fabric type of cinch below the brake bridge just in case. A friend of mine used to put 2, on in the brake bridge area and the second one round mid chainstay just in case only.
Good luck.
I have used two rods and with washers and bolts, one at each side then you go turning the bolts the same turns at both side. From 126 to 130 mm the rear end needs to spread around 150 to 160 but it depends on the steel also. Some reynolds is pretty easy to bend, the last bike i did was mine and had Columbus SL (all the tubes) and that one took me like 45 mins doing it really slow. The other thing I did was to put like a belt or a fabric type of cinch below the brake bridge just in case. A friend of mine used to put 2, on in the brake bridge area and the second one round mid chainstay just in case only.
Good luck.
#20
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,516
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
+1 Done a couple mid-late eightys 126 mm Treks. 130 wheels drop right in with minimal effort.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Done it without 2*4 with good results;
Take off shoes and socks.
Sit on floor holding frame in front of you
one hand on headtube, one hand on seattube, plant foot against farside chainstay
push with foot to bend chainstay outwards
-alternatly,
hand on headtube, foot on seattube, other hand pulling nearside chainstay
pull chainstay towards you
use foot power for big adjustments, hand power for control
be careful, biker legs are stronger than you think...
Take off shoes and socks.
Sit on floor holding frame in front of you
one hand on headtube, one hand on seattube, plant foot against farside chainstay
push with foot to bend chainstay outwards
-alternatly,
hand on headtube, foot on seattube, other hand pulling nearside chainstay
pull chainstay towards you
use foot power for big adjustments, hand power for control
be careful, biker legs are stronger than you think...