Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bar-end aero cable routing - guides?

    I'm almost done with the drivetrain upgrade on my old road bike, and went for an under-tape cable routing. The shimano bar-end shifters came with flexible plastic guides that are supposed to be installed on the lower side of the handlebar. So I promptly put them on but I'm not entirely sure I like the final result.

    I'd like to hear back from people with a similar set-up: did you install the guides or not and what were your experiences?

  2. #2
    Wookie Jesus inspires me. Puget Pounder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,225
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't use them.

  3. #3
    just pokin' along desertdork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the desert
    Posts
    1,036
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I first did mine, I did the "traditional" routing with the housing exiting the tape before the bend. In that case, I did use the guides.

    Since then, I've been using the *aero* routing w/o the guides. I imagine using them would cause an undesirable bump at their termination.

  4. #4
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,909
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Didn't even know they existed. Didn't use them. I've done two bikes with routing under the tape the whole way. By the way, if you haven't actually run the cable yet, you may find that you need a tandem shift cable for length when routing under the bar tape, especially if it is a tall frame. For me, the standard cable was about 6" too short.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by desertdork View Post
    Since then, I've been using the *aero* routing w/o the guides.
    And I'm assuming you didn't notice any shifting performance difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by desertdork View Post
    I imagine using them would cause an undesirable bump at their termination.
    My main gripe is that the guide must bend toward the inside of the handlebar for the shifter cable to clear the brake lever. It's not exactly a beautiful sight.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doohickie View Post
    For me, the standard cable was about 6" too short.
    Yeah, the one included is not long enough to clear the final loop of housing. Luckily an LBS sells one that's 2,27 m, that should do.

    BTW did you ppl use the final loop that came with the shifter? it looks a bit short to me.

  6. #6
    Asi
    Asi is offline
    Engineer Asi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania, Europe
    My Bikes
    1989 Krapf (with Dura-ace) road bike, 1973 Sputnik (made by XB3) road bike , 1961 Peugeot fixed gear, 2010 Trek 4400
    Posts
    489
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or run the cables inside the handlebars. I have a setup like this (3tt +br-7402 have the cables run inside the handlebars - late 80's)

  7. #7
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,909
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by alms View Post
    BTW did you ppl use the final loop that came with the shifter? it looks a bit short to me.
    Do you mean the loop at the derailleur? About 12" is the right length.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,260
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Asi View Post
    Or run the cables inside the handlebars. I have a setup like this (3tt +br-7402 have the cables run inside the handlebars - late 80's)
    This has been done but requires drilling entrance holes near the shifters and, worse, exit holes near the stem. It may have been safe with steel or older thick wall aluminum bars but I wouldn't even consider it with current light weight aluminum bars or, heaven forbid, carbon bars.

  9. #9
    bike whisperer Kimmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    My Bikes
    copy/paste links: http://velospace.org/node/36949 http://velospace.org/node/47746 http://velospace.org/node/47747
    Posts
    6,819
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are we talking about aero extensions or drop bars? IMO holes in the extensions = meh

  10. #10
    just pokin' along desertdork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the desert
    Posts
    1,036
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by alms View Post
    And I'm assuming you didn't notice any shifting performance difference?
    None. Shifts great. 5k miles, haven't had to touch a thing.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Albany, NY
    My Bikes
    89 Bianchi Campione d'Italia upgraded with 10 speed Ultegra/105, '92 Trek 1100 8 speed, bar end shifters
    Posts
    243
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I reccomend the traditional exit before the bend routing. It makes for less cable/housing length and more efficient shifting. The housings shouldn't get in the way of your hands if routed this way so the only other reason to route it under the tape the whole way is just for aesthetics, which i think takes a back seat to function.

  12. #12
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,909
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standard Issue View Post
    The housings shouldn't get in the way of your hands if routed this way so the only other reason to route it under the tape the whole way is just for aesthetics, which i think takes a back seat to function.
    Yeah, they got in the way of my headlight in my case, so they're under the tape now.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,260
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standard Issue View Post
    the only other reason to route it under the tape the whole way is just for aesthetics, which i think takes a back seat to function.
    You haven't been dealing with bikes very long have you? Function often (even usually) takes a back seat to aesthetics.

  14. #14
    bike whisperer Kimmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    My Bikes
    copy/paste links: http://velospace.org/node/36949 http://velospace.org/node/47746 http://velospace.org/node/47747
    Posts
    6,819
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To my mind, aesthetics kinda follow function to a large extent in a certain way...

    Obviously a bunch of functional Fredly accessories isn't very aesthetic; I think the key overlap is in the functional refinement of the pure form.

    So to me, a lovely old pantographed drillium classic can't hold an aesthetic candle to modern carbon aero weapon sporting all the latest tricks.

    The old bike might look fancy, but unlike the new, its aesthetic appeal isn't almost entirely defined by the raison d'etre of the bicycle: function.

    In other words, decals and paint aside, the slippery carbon number's looks are appealing for similar reasons to those why a shark or cat is visually appealing, rather than say, Victorian architecture.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,260
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmo View Post
    So to me, a lovely old pantographed drillium classic can't hold an aesthetic candle to modern carbon aero weapon sporting all the latest tricks.
    +1. Drillium and, particularly pantographing, were actually counter-functional. They weakened and damaged parts in the interest of appearance. Some of the modern, over-the-top paint schemes and odd designs (like Pinerallo's wierd wavey fork blades) are not functional but, at least, do no harm.

  16. #16
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    38,876
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Plastic caterpillars were included with Shimano's Aero Brake levers in the 80s,
    when the bars had no grooves pressed in them yet.

    Also included was a double ended housing ferrule,
    so replacing bent housing only from the ferrule outward,
    rather than re-taping the whole thing.

    That piece is even more handy..
    Last edited by fietsbob; 05-17-12 at 09:47 AM.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,489
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standard Issue View Post
    I reccomend the traditional exit before the bend routing. It makes for less cable/housing length and more efficient shifting. The housings shouldn't get in the way of your hands if routed this way so the only other reason to route it under the tape the whole way is just for aesthetics, which i think takes a back seat to function.
    Is this based on your experience, or theoretical? The reason I ask is that I used my bar end shifters both ways and noticed absolutely no degradation in function when I ran the cables under the bar tape. The shifting was perfect both ways. If/when I do bar ends again (which I probably will), I plan to install the cables under the tape again.

    To me, it looked better, yes, but actually, I didn't like those huge curved housing sticking out front - they caught on things more frequently when I would move the bike around, especially in and out of the back of my car(s). So, form, function and aesthetics were in perfect harmony.
    Last edited by Camilo; 05-17-12 at 11:10 AM.

  18. #18
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    38,876
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are you setting up a tri-timetrial bike,
    and putting the bar end shifters on the front end of the Aero Bars?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •