Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member GordoTrek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    My Bikes
    1990 Trek 930 singletrack, 1982 Trek 412, 1993 Trek 2200 Composite,1974 Raleigh Grand Prix Porteur, 1975 Raleigh Sports,1984 Schwinn World Sport,
    Posts
    704
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    carbon fork on 90's steel mountain bike

    besides the cost...
    does adding a carbon fork mess with geometry of the bike that much ? if you at least get similar rake angle on the fork, will the less weight make a big difference?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,955
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When in the 90's? if pre '95 then possibly as they were designed for <80mm travel, '95 and beyond you should be OK, would also look at your headset, it is much easier to find a 1" 1/8th fork than 1", although they are around if you look.

    For weight, this will depend on the fork, if full carbon, should be lighter than a steel fork, if a carbon / alu mix, then probably the same, either should be lighter than a suspension fork.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
    My Bikes
    7 single speed road
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'd be interested in how you plan to address front braking. it was always a concern when i thought about doing this on an MTB.

  4. #4
    Senior Member CACycling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Oxnard, CA
    My Bikes
    '08 Fuji Roubaix RC; '07 Schwinn Le Tour GS; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
    Posts
    4,388
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd look for one that is as close to what you have as possible in rake and axle to crown length (there are various options out there) as well as mounts for whatever brakes you plan to use (canti/linear or disc). Depending on the quality/weight of your current fork and the quality/weight of the new one, you'd probably shed at least a pound, more if your current fork is suspension.

  5. #5
    Constant tinkerer FastJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,014
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 Need to check your headtube: 1" or 1 1/8". If it's 1" your options will be limited.

    I'd go for a non-suspension-corrected fork, or something meant for less travel.

    As far as weight, I'd say anything more than a half a pound will make a "significant" difference. If you drop a pound or more IMO the change is worthwhile.
    Why "derailer" is the correct way to spell the gear-change mechanism: sheldonbrown.com/derailer.html

  6. #6
    George Krpan
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westlake Village, California
    Posts
    1,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You may find that you went through the expense and hassle only to find that it doesn't ride as well as a good old steel fork.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •