Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question about a frame that is to small for me.

    I'm 6 ft. tall with a long torso and 32 inch pants inseam. I normally ride a 56cm bike, but I have a 50cm Motobecane Grand Sprint frame sitting around. I really like the frame and would like to build it up. I know it is way to small. Could it be made to work with a head tube extension and a tall seat post without looking like an elephant on a tricycle.

  2. #2
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    19,246
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    No. I bet your bicycle inseam is even longer.

  3. #3
    Senior Member calstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    santa barbara CA
    Posts
    784
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6cm=a little over 2", so you have a seat post and stem that much longer. You could also get a stem with positive rise so that would cut down on exposed quill. You already have the frame, build it up(ideally with parts you have, you might borrow a few items from your 56cm so you can ride the 50cm without spending much) and ride it. If you really like it build up to keep as another in your stable. I'm a very big guy, my bikes are huge, and I could care less if they don't look "normal/typical", I love to ride them. You might look at some of the rides in the pro peletons, way more seat post than "normal".

    Brian

  4. #4
    Senior Member Lexi01's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Geelong, Australia
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
    Posts
    659
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Given the pretty generic way manufacturers tend to size bikes these days (roll eyes) as calstar says it may be about 6 cm shorter in the seat tube.

    So if your 56 has a whole lot of exposed seat post you might be in a little strife...but if you're running a pretty small seat to bar drop on the 56 the 50 might be doable with a longer seat post and longer stem. You may even need to flip the stem over to angle up (shudder)...

  5. #5
    tcarl
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    My Bikes
    Roark, Waterford 1100, 1987 Schwinn Paramount, Nishiki Professional, Bottecchia, 2 Scattantes, 3 Cannondale touring bikes, mtn. bike, cyclocross, hybrid, 1940's era Schwinn
    Posts
    254
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, you can get a long seat post and tall stem, but I think you've forgotten about top tube length. I'm 5' 9", have a 31 inch inseam, fit best on a 56 cm frame, but can ride 58 or 54 cm. On my 54 cm frame I'm already using a 130mm stem. If you'd go to a 50 cm frame I'd guess (don't really know for sure) you'd need a 160 - 170mm stem (I've never seen or heard of one that long), and you state you have a long torso, so may need one even longer. If such a thing even exists it would look weird and possibly be so long as to affect bike handling.
    Last edited by tcarl; 05-18-12 at 03:21 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Lexi01's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Geelong, Australia
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
    Posts
    659
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tcarl View Post
    If such a thing even exists it would look weird and possibly be so long as to affect bike handling.
    Good point...you'd be pretty far over the front wheel...could get somewhat twitchy!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,017
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tcarl View Post
    Yes, you can get a long seat post and tall stem, but I think you've forgotten about top tube length. I'm 5' 9", have a 31 inch inseam, fit best on a 56 cm frame, but can ride 58 or 54 cm. On my 54 cm frame I'm already using a 130mm stem. If you'd go to a 50 cm stem I'd guess (don't really know for sure) you'd need a 160 - 170mm stem (I've never seen or heard of one that long), and you state you have a long torso, so may need one even longer. If such a thing even exists it would look weird and possibly be so long as to affect bike handling.
    How about a tandem stoker's stem facing forward like a normal stem?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,260
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You are wasting your time and money on a frame that is much too small. It's like you wear a size 10 shoe and someone offered you a super bargain on a pair of size 8.

    Put the frame on Craigs List and use the money to buy the right size.

  9. #9
    Carpe Velo Yo Spiff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    My Bikes
    2000 Bianchi Veloce, '88 Trek 900, '88 Schwinn Prologue, '92 Schwinn Crosscut, '03 Diamondback Tandem, '94 Yokota Grizzly Peak
    Posts
    2,499
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's about my size and I'm 5'7" with stumpy legs. Even with a long seatpost and stem, I expect you would feel scrunched up on it like it was a little kid's bike. I rode a 48 cm frame for a little while that came from a relative (she was convinced to buy a road bike when a hybrid or cruiser would have been best), I hated it. Way too small, even with a long stem. This match would be even worse for you.
    2000 Bianchi Veloce, '88 Schwinn Prologue, '88 Trek 900, '92 Trek T100, 2000 Rans Tailwind

  10. #10
    Banned.
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can get a long seat post and tall stem, you can ride 58 or 56 cm for best comfort.
    Last edited by centralpark; 05-25-12 at 05:22 AM.

  11. #11
    The Left Coast, USA FrenchFit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,320
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that's just too much, you'll end up feeling like one of those circus clowns on a tiny bike. I ride down a size on my tourer, and MTB, but the top tube length isn't all that far off and I can still get a decent KOPS position. But 56cm to 50cm, that's a huge difference regardless of the geo on the Motobecane, and 56cm might be a size down for you anyway. I think you are just buying trouble. Perhaps you can trade the frame?

  12. #12
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Heck, I'm 5'5" and ride a 54cm with 120mm stem. I like to have plenty of top-tube clearance for a flat back with my head a hip-level, plenty of breathing space and no knee-to-elbow interference.

  13. #13
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    My Bikes
    CCM Torino 76
    Posts
    937
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If it is an older bike with a level top tube then it is waaay too small. No matter what you do the bike will never feel quite right. If it is a more modern frame with a sloping top tube then 50cm may only be two sizes too small.

    However, if it is a modern motobecane (bikes direct) it is not really worth any effort to make it right - it is a cookie-cutter asian frame that can be replaced with a new one of similar quality for $200 - $300 or so. Older ones have a little more style. But yours would be best saved for someone 5'6" or so who can enjoy it properly.

    FWIW, the 'quality' of a bike, the frame material, the components, the name on the frame decals... all are less important than proper fit for the rider... a 50 cm frame simply is the wrong size for you. THe comment above about getting a great deal on shoes that are 2 sizes too small is perfect..

  14. #14
    bike whisperer Kimmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    My Bikes
    copy/paste links: http://velospace.org/node/36949 http://velospace.org/node/47746 http://velospace.org/node/47747
    Posts
    6,819
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DCB0 View Post
    If it is an older bike with a level top tube then it is waaay too small. No matter what you do the bike will never feel quite right. If it is a more modern frame with a sloping top tube then 50cm may only be two sizes too small.
    Which perfectly illustrates why not sizing bikes by effective top tube length is bloody stupid. It f**king s**ts me to bloody tears, dammit.

    I can only imagine the OP's bikes are compact frames, cause I'm 5'10" and I take a traditional 57. Actually, my current bike is square (most 57s have a 55-56cm top tube, IIRC) and I prefer it.

    Anyway, my advice to the OP (and everyone else, for that matter) is to forget about bloody useless seat tube lengths and figure out what effective top tube length suits you. Then you can ignore the length of a tube that only determines the height of a clamp, and inquire about a dimension that actually matters a damn.

  15. #15
    Galveston County Texas 10 Wheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    In The Wind
    Posts
    25,090
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gamedic View Post
    I'm 6 ft. tall with a long torso and 32 inch pants inseam. I normally ride a 56cm bike, but I have a 50cm Motobecane Grand Sprint frame sitting around. I really like the frame and would like to build it up. I know it is way to small. Could it be made to work with a head tube extension and a tall seat post without looking like an elephant on a tricycle.
    You should be able to make it fit.

    bikefit.jpg
    [SIZE=1][B]What I like about Texas[/B]
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGukLuXzH1E

    Set F1re To The Ra1n ( NY Night Rain Ride)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7jfcWEkSrI

  16. #16
    bike whisperer Kimmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    My Bikes
    copy/paste links: http://velospace.org/node/36949 http://velospace.org/node/47746 http://velospace.org/node/47747
    Posts
    6,819
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pmsl

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,260
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmo View Post
    Which perfectly illustrates why not sizing bikes by effective top tube length is bloody stupid. It f**king s**ts me to bloody tears, dammit.

    I can only imagine the OP's bikes are compact frames, cause I'm 5'10" and I take a traditional 57. Actually, my current bike is square (most 57s have a 55-56cm top tube, IIRC) and I prefer it.

    Anyway, my advice to the OP (and everyone else, for that matter) is to forget about bloody useless seat tube lengths and figure out what effective top tube length suits you. Then you can ignore the length of a tube that only determines the height of a clamp, and inquire about a dimension that actually matters a damn.
    Your point is well taken but in this case the frame does indeed have a nearly level top tube so the nominal sizing correctly implies the top tube length. From Bikes Direct web site's geometry table this 50 cm frame has an effective top tube length of 52.1 cm which should be far too short for the OP.

  18. #18
    Senior Member LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    19,483
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)
    If you decide to go through with it I have a 160mm 1" stem, 5-ish degree rise, 25.4mm clamp, I haven't tried fitting drop bars in it, however.

    Yours for $11 shipped.

    I'll be out on tour for a bit over a week, so can't ship for a while.
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    461
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    54 cm, sure . My inseam is 31 or 32, and I have a 54cm bike on which I use a long quill stem and a seatpost with a lot of setback, and it's fine.

    50cm is really pushing it I think. But everyone is different and there is no right or wrong, just what seems to work.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •