Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-20-12, 05:43 PM   #1
yannis
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mudguards

Which should be the ideal space between tire and fender?
Is a 10mm space enough?
yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-12, 06:05 PM   #2
yannis
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Another relative question. I have read that is difficult, but not impossible, to fit a fender under a short reach brake. Will a short reach brake fit on a frame hosting 40mm tires, or larger, and fenders?
yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-12, 07:09 PM   #3
yannis
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thinking about it a little more...

10mm the distance between the hole for the brake's bolt and the bottom of the frame (where the "wheel hosting space" starts)
+5mm (minimum) clearance
-----------
Total 15mm

The short reach brakes have a maximum reach of 59mm without exception

Removing what above calculated are remaining 44mm. These 44mm are the space where the wheel (tire and rim) is inside the brake callipers.
Removing 8-10mm more (the rim's surface for the pads), remaining 34-36mm.
So, a short reach brake with maximum reach of 59mm could host a 34-36mm wide tire (or a smaller tire and fender).

Am I wrong?

Last edited by yannis; 05-20-12 at 07:45 PM.
yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-12, 07:15 PM   #4
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
10 mm between the tire and the inside of the fender is plenty. 5 mm clearance is marginal if any mud or debris gets between the tire and the fender. BTW "short reach' brakes have a amximum extension of typically 47-49 mm. "Long reach" have an maximum extension of 57 -59 mm. I expect neither will clear a 40 mm tire.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-12, 07:43 PM   #5
yannis
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
BTW "short reach' brakes have a amximum extension of typically 47-49 mm..
This should be an ultra short reach brake calliper.
yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-12, 07:59 PM   #6
Andrew R Stewart 
Andrew R Stewart
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Raleigh Pro, Trek Cycle Cross, Mongoose tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder
Posts: 6,612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
You can do the math/diagraming easily enough. But there's a reason that cantis/linears are used on large profiled tires, espicially with fenders. The leverage goes down with the longer caliper arms needed to clear the big tires and fenders. But then you probably already knew this. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 09:07 AM   #7
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by yannis View Post
This should be an ultra short reach brake calliper.
Not in today's terminology.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 09:36 AM   #8
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 18,714
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
People have fabricated mounts for mudguards,
that cover the tire every where but
where the clearance under the brake is insufficient.
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 11:13 AM   #9
yannis
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart View Post
You can do the math/diagraming easily enough. But there's a reason that cantis/linears are used on large profiled tires, espicially with fenders. The leverage goes down with the longer caliper arms needed to clear the big tires and fenders. But then you probably already knew this. Andy.
Do you mean that short reach brakes have not the sufficient power to stop wider rims?
I have heard about it and also something similar about the length and the shape of the brake levers, but I am not an expert...
Could you explain me with more details the relationship between rim width and caliper arm length?
yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 02:51 PM   #10
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Short reach brakes have plenty of power to stop wider rims. What they may not have is sufficient room under them to clear the wider, taller tires that normally accompany wider rims.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 10:26 PM   #11
Andrew R Stewart 
Andrew R Stewart
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Raleigh Pro, Trek Cycle Cross, Mongoose tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder
Posts: 6,612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
As hillrider said. Andy
Andrew R Stewart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM.