Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Mudguards

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mudguards

    Which should be the ideal space between tire and fender?
    Is a 10mm space enough?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another relative question. I have read that is difficult, but not impossible, to fit a fender under a short reach brake. Will a short reach brake fit on a frame hosting 40mm tires, or larger, and fenders?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thinking about it a little more...

    10mm the distance between the hole for the brake's bolt and the bottom of the frame (where the "wheel hosting space" starts)
    +5mm (minimum) clearance
    -----------
    Total 15mm

    The short reach brakes have a maximum reach of 59mm without exception

    Removing what above calculated are remaining 44mm. These 44mm are the space where the wheel (tire and rim) is inside the brake callipers.
    Removing 8-10mm more (the rim's surface for the pads), remaining 34-36mm.
    So, a short reach brake with maximum reach of 59mm could host a 34-36mm wide tire (or a smaller tire and fender).

    Am I wrong?
    Last edited by yannis; 05-20-12 at 08:45 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,135
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    10 mm between the tire and the inside of the fender is plenty. 5 mm clearance is marginal if any mud or debris gets between the tire and the fender. BTW "short reach' brakes have a amximum extension of typically 47-49 mm. "Long reach" have an maximum extension of 57 -59 mm. I expect neither will clear a 40 mm tire.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    BTW "short reach' brakes have a amximum extension of typically 47-49 mm..
    This should be an ultra short reach brake calliper.

  6. #6
    Andrew R Stewart Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    My Bikes
    Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Raleigh Pro, Trek Cycle Cross, Mongoose tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder
    Posts
    3,715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can do the math/diagraming easily enough. But there's a reason that cantis/linears are used on large profiled tires, espicially with fenders. The leverage goes down with the longer caliper arms needed to clear the big tires and fenders. But then you probably already knew this. Andy.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,135
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by yannis View Post
    This should be an ultra short reach brake calliper.
    Not in today's terminology.

  8. #8
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    3,100
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    People have fabricated mounts for mudguards,
    that cover the tire every where but
    where the clearance under the brake is insufficient.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart View Post
    You can do the math/diagraming easily enough. But there's a reason that cantis/linears are used on large profiled tires, espicially with fenders. The leverage goes down with the longer caliper arms needed to clear the big tires and fenders. But then you probably already knew this. Andy.
    Do you mean that short reach brakes have not the sufficient power to stop wider rims?
    I have heard about it and also something similar about the length and the shape of the brake levers, but I am not an expert...
    Could you explain me with more details the relationship between rim width and caliper arm length?

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,135
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Short reach brakes have plenty of power to stop wider rims. What they may not have is sufficient room under them to clear the wider, taller tires that normally accompany wider rims.

  11. #11
    Andrew R Stewart Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    My Bikes
    Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Raleigh Pro, Trek Cycle Cross, Mongoose tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder
    Posts
    3,715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As hillrider said. Andy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •