Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-12, 11:37 AM   #1
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 7,031
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Questions On Wheelbuild In Progress

Hey guys, I am having some trouble w/ my third wheel build, and wanted to check if you think I am on the right track.

Rims are used Mavic MA40s, lot of brake wear on the anodization but rims look straight when placed on glass counter, I greased the base of the eyelets (where the nipples seat) just in case there was corrosion but they looked fine down there.

Hubs are used Normandy high flange, this is from a '70's Peugeot. Daughter's UO-8 is getting the steel basketweave Rigidas replaced with inexpensive but sort-of-period alloy rims.

Spokes are new Wheelsmith 2.0mm straight everywhere, except I'm using Wheelsmith 2.0-1.7-2.0mm double butted for rear non-drive side.

Nipples are new DT brass.

Pattern is basic 3 cross.

The problem I'm having with the rear wheel is: I still have about 1/4" correction to make to dish, need to pull the rim toward the drive side, but the drive side nipples are getting worryingly hard to turn.

I did grease the spoke threads and have placed a drop of oil on the nipple-spoke and nipple-eyelet points too. Even so, some of the nipples feel like they are getting close to rounding over. (You know how you can feel that point coming.) I'm using a basic Park spoke wrench, size 0.

Drive side tension is about #26 on the Park TM-1 tool which translates to about 135 lb I think. On the non-drive side it is about #20 which translates to about 110 lb. Tension on each side is pretty darned even. Lateral true is pretty close by now, so is radial, its really the dish that I am struggling with - no, I don't know why I didn't get dish sorted out before things got to this point.

I stopped working on this wheel last night, to think about what to do before I broke something. My plan now is (1) to make further dish corrections (and further lateral/radial corrections) by loosening the non-drive side, not by tightening the drive side. (2) to get a "four-sided" spoke wrench, to use if I do need to tighten a drive side spoke a bit.

Make sense? Or, do you think I should back off the tension on both sides?
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 11:47 AM   #2
Doohickie 
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
I would loosen the non-drive side spokes even further and see what happens.

Who calculated the spoke lengths? Are you getting to the ends of the threads on the drive side?
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 11:58 AM   #3
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Posts: 3,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Way overtensioned for drive side...

Bring those down to 24 on the dial...with wheel dished.

=8-)
__________________
4000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 12:07 PM   #4
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 7,031
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Thanks for the replies! I will back off tension.

I used 613 ERD for the rims, that was what all the online sources have. I measured the hubs myself, and cross-checked against online sources - the measurements were pretty consistent (e.g. center-to-flange was different by 1 mm). I don't have the numbers with me right now.

I plugged the numbers into two online calculators, the bikeschool one and I think the other is called "EDD"?. Got spoke lengths that were very close between the two calculators. I also checked the difference between my hub measurements and the online ones, and they didn't give meaningfully different spoke lengths.

Then I rounded up to the nearest whole mm, since the shop only has whole mm lengths. Previously I've always rounded down; in future I will go back to rounding down because rounding up seems to give me more spoke than I need.

However, I'm not running into the end of the thread on either drive or non-drive side.

One thing is, I'm not sure what tension to aim for. In the past I was told that if the drive side gets to around 130 lb that's fine, and to let the non-drive side be what it will.

The spokes are all straightened, stress relieved, and so on.

By the way, I !despise! my dishing tool (Park WAG5) and want to either find an old tool that is actually solid, or start dishing into the truing stand.
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 12:36 PM   #5
cbchess
Map maker
 
cbchess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Richmond,VA
Bikes: Ventana El Ciclon, Walt Works 29er, Specialized Enduro (fixed up for my son).
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had some trouble with that before while lacing with wheel smith spokes. I was using a used rim with a hop at the rim joint.- I could not pull things into shape - then one othe spokes failed at the head - not where the problem was at on the rim. after a few more spokes failed I switched BACK to DT spokes and never have used wheelsmith again.
cbchess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 01:00 PM   #6
gyozadude
Senior Member
 
gyozadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Posts: 1,180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The 1/4 inch off on dish is a lot. I have to wonder if your axle spacing forces you to extreme asymmetric dish. Note: your tension is quite high. And the conversion should be to kg-force, not lbs-force (multiply by 2.2 to get pounds). Target tension on the drive side typically is around 23 - 24 on the meter as Mr. Rabbit says. That gets you roughly to 100 kg of force. That's 220 lbs of tension on a typical 14g spoke.. I get maybe 2/3rds or less tension on the non-drive side. But it really depends on the axle spacing and amount of dish offset. Old 126mm road hubs had really back asymmetrical dish, and that pretty much has forced me to go with adding spacers to get to 130mm on the non-drive side and messing with locknuts and spacing on the drive side to set the minimum clearance needed for the chain to clear the stay when shifting to the smallest cog, and any space I can give to the non-drive side, I do.

But it sounds like you might get some benefit from loosening, almost all the non-drive side spokes, almost completely, then measuring dish and drive-side tension (which should also be much looser) and then slowly tighten the non-drive side. If you can't put any significant tension on the non-drive side (more than half), then you may need to mess with the axle.
gyozadude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 02:17 PM   #7
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 7,031
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
The rear spacing is 120mm I think (1975 Peugeot) and these are the original hubs to the bike, some unnamed Gauloise-smoking monsieur or madamoiselle was able to dish the wheel properly with the original Rigidas so I think I shouldn't have to resort to spacers.

I plan to swap a 6 speed freewheel in place of the original Maillard 5 speed, mostly so that I can someday put indexing on the bike, but it is a Suntour Ultra FW so only slightly wider than the original.

Sorry that I was misreading the Park chart and got confused between kg and lb.
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-12, 02:27 PM   #8
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Posts: 3,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyl View Post
The rear spacing is 120mm I think (1975 Peugeot) and these are the original hubs to the bike, some unnamed Gauloise-smoking monsieur or madamoiselle was able to dish the wheel properly with the original Rigidas so I think I shouldn't have to resort to spacers.

I plan to swap a 6 speed freewheel in place of the original Maillard 5 speed, mostly so that I can someday put indexing on the bike, but it is a Suntour Ultra FW so only slightly wider than the original.

Sorry that I was misreading the Park chart and got confused between kg and lb.
So long as the distance from the freewheel stop to the end of the lock nut is at least 31mm, the Ultra 6 should work.

=8-)
__________________
4000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-12, 11:30 PM   #9
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 7,031
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Again, thanks to all! The wheels turned out nicely. On the bike, with 25 width tires at 120 psi, these wheels roll and stop so much better than the wobbly steel basket weave 27" Rigidas that were on there, on which I couldn't inflate a tire past 60 psi. Like night and day. We'll see how well I built them, if they stay true.
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-12, 12:22 AM   #10
Kimmo
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Bikes: velospace.org/viewcluster?c=873
Posts: 7,115
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
One approach with rears I've tried with good results is to crank the drive side tension right up with hardly anything on the NDS.

Then, getting the dish right is easy, since you do it by adding tension to the NDS. It's easier on the nipples.
Kimmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-12, 12:27 AM   #11
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 7,031
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Oh, decided not to put on the Ultra FW just yet, because it is a 23T while the current Maillard is a 28T, and daughter wants/needs the 28T to climb the local hill. When she's off a camp this summer, I'll replace steel cottered crankset with a compact drive, then swap in the 23T. Actually going to go through the whole bike this summer and surprise her when she returns. Gotta find a Maillard FW remover so I don't have to keep running to the bike shop.
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.