Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-12, 12:40 PM   #1
beezaur
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Shimano Links in a KMC Chain?

Just thought I'd ask on the outside chance this might work:

I have a trike with a new-ish KMC chain (XSP X9) that is too short, and a new Shimano chain (HG53), both 9-speed. Pins are Shimano.

Can I put a couple of inches in the chain that way, or do I need to buy a matching KMC chain?
beezaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-12, 12:57 PM   #2
gyozadude
Senior Member
 
gyozadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Posts: 1,180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't have the exact inner/outer widths of the chains but experience would indicate -slight- differences in width both inside and outside on the shimano versus kmc or other manufacturer chain. I wouldn't recommend it ever to splice disimilar chains together for a permanent fix. I've only done so for a temporary repair to get someone going for a short period (a few days) until I could get a longer chain ordered (or two exact same chains ordered).
gyozadude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-12, 01:10 PM   #3
beezaur
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks.

I didn't know if there was some sort of a standard that would guarantee compatibility between brands. If there's not, I'm not going to chance it.
beezaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-12, 01:32 PM   #4
desertdork
just pokin' along
 
desertdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Bikes:
Posts: 1,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As for standards, the pitch and internal width are identical. As for 9sp, I believe KMC and Shimano (as well as SRAM) all have external widths of 6.6mm. Other than the spliced section of chain possibly wearing at a slightly different rate, I don't see what issue there would be. I'd opt for two KMC missing links (CL566R) to join it.
desertdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-12, 01:43 PM   #5
gyozadude
Senior Member
 
gyozadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Posts: 1,180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The width alone isn't the key. There is the inner link shape, and the base of the outer link pin where the inner bushingless link rests on. The radius and shape may vary and there is no guarantee of compatibility. You splice at your own risk. We talk about minute fractions of a mm in link pin pressing when replacing chains being a concern for the chain breaking, but I think the inner link shape and bushingless radius is even more important. Some are flat with perpendicular, but some are not. It's far more risky, IMO, than just pushing the link pin back on the chain without replacing the master link or using a new chain pin. It's not that I'm paranoid, but I wouldn't recommend it for more than an emergency repair, and only if that person is reasonable in weight. For a clyde - probably not except if I had no choice.
gyozadude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-12, 02:19 PM   #6
beezaur
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gyozadude View Post
There is the inner link shape, and the base of the outer link pin where the inner bushingless link rests on. The radius and shape may vary and there is no guarantee of compatibility. . . .
Yes, this is my main concern.

This will be a permanent modification.
beezaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-12, 02:27 PM   #7
desertdork
just pokin' along
 
desertdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Bikes:
Posts: 1,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The KMC CL566R missing link is listed as being compatible with Shimano and, of course, KMC 9sp chains. I don't see how it couldn't be trusted to join and hold sections of each brand together.
desertdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-12, 02:57 AM   #8
Papa Ado
almost like new
 
Papa Ado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Taiwan
Bikes:
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Confirmed - Shimano HG 9 speed chains and KMC X9 chains both have actual pin length of 6.6mm as mentioned previously in this thread. You can connect your two segments using two Missing links (CL566R).

As for strength, a lot of tests are run this way - segments of chain spliced together and chains are put under heavy stress.

Final note, if you are finicky, you will notice a difference in performance as a result of superior chamfering on the X9.
Papa Ado is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.